探索说明书外疫苗使用:全球国家免疫技术咨询小组网络调查。

IF 3.5
Vaccine Pub Date : 2025-08-30 Epub Date: 2025-08-12 DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127581
Candace Roberts, Karina A Top, Louise Henaff, Matthew Tunis, Awnish Singh, Judith van Holten, Simona Ruta, Shalini Desai
{"title":"探索说明书外疫苗使用:全球国家免疫技术咨询小组网络调查。","authors":"Candace Roberts, Karina A Top, Louise Henaff, Matthew Tunis, Awnish Singh, Judith van Holten, Simona Ruta, Shalini Desai","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups (NITAGs) are crucial for enhancing vaccine use in immunization programs, particularly through off-label recommendations. This study sought to assess the adoption and trends of off-label vaccine recommendations made by NITAGs across low-, middle-, and high-income countries since the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was distributed to NITAG representatives in World Health Organization (WHO) member states, asking questions related to off-label use of vaccines including policies, procedures, legislation, and regulations for NITAGs in participants' countries. Respondents across all six WHO regions were invited to participate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respondents from 76 countries participated in the survey (55 %) were NITAG representatives, and 45 % were immunization program managers or from the NITAG secretariat). Most respondents 52 (68 %) reported their NITAG makes off-label recommendations, 18 (24 %) indicated their NITAG does not make off-label recommendations, and 6 (8 %) were unsure of their NITAG's role. There was a noticeable shift relating to off-label vaccine recommendations observed pre, during, and post-pandemic period. Prior to 2022, 25 (48 %) respondents indicated their country recommended off-label vaccines, 11 (21 %) specified off-label recommendations were limited to emergencies as temporary or conditional expansions, and 6 (12 %) were unsure. After 2022, 30 (58 %) respondents indicated their country recommended off-label vaccines, 4 (8 %) specified off-label recommendations were limited to emergencies as temporary or conditional expansions, 18 (35 %) selected no, and 0 (0%) were unsure. While most countries make off-label recommendations, few (15 %) have policies and procedures to support implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although WHO broadly provides guidance on the mandate and core functions of NITAGs, globally, they have differing mandates and operational capacities related to off-label vaccine use. These findings suggest the need for increased awareness of off-label vaccine recommendations and strengthened dialogue around implementation of off-label recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":94264,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"62 ","pages":"127581"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12447085/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring off-label vaccine use: a survey of the global national immunization technical advisory group network.\",\"authors\":\"Candace Roberts, Karina A Top, Louise Henaff, Matthew Tunis, Awnish Singh, Judith van Holten, Simona Ruta, Shalini Desai\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127581\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups (NITAGs) are crucial for enhancing vaccine use in immunization programs, particularly through off-label recommendations. This study sought to assess the adoption and trends of off-label vaccine recommendations made by NITAGs across low-, middle-, and high-income countries since the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was distributed to NITAG representatives in World Health Organization (WHO) member states, asking questions related to off-label use of vaccines including policies, procedures, legislation, and regulations for NITAGs in participants' countries. Respondents across all six WHO regions were invited to participate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respondents from 76 countries participated in the survey (55 %) were NITAG representatives, and 45 % were immunization program managers or from the NITAG secretariat). Most respondents 52 (68 %) reported their NITAG makes off-label recommendations, 18 (24 %) indicated their NITAG does not make off-label recommendations, and 6 (8 %) were unsure of their NITAG's role. There was a noticeable shift relating to off-label vaccine recommendations observed pre, during, and post-pandemic period. Prior to 2022, 25 (48 %) respondents indicated their country recommended off-label vaccines, 11 (21 %) specified off-label recommendations were limited to emergencies as temporary or conditional expansions, and 6 (12 %) were unsure. After 2022, 30 (58 %) respondents indicated their country recommended off-label vaccines, 4 (8 %) specified off-label recommendations were limited to emergencies as temporary or conditional expansions, 18 (35 %) selected no, and 0 (0%) were unsure. While most countries make off-label recommendations, few (15 %) have policies and procedures to support implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although WHO broadly provides guidance on the mandate and core functions of NITAGs, globally, they have differing mandates and operational capacities related to off-label vaccine use. These findings suggest the need for increased awareness of off-label vaccine recommendations and strengthened dialogue around implementation of off-label recommendations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vaccine\",\"volume\":\"62 \",\"pages\":\"127581\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12447085/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vaccine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127581\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:国家免疫技术咨询小组(NITAGs)对于加强免疫规划中的疫苗使用至关重要,特别是通过标签外建议。本研究旨在评估自COVID-19大流行以来,NITAGs在低收入、中等收入和高收入国家对超说明书疫苗建议的采用情况和趋势。方法:向世界卫生组织(WHO)成员国的NITAG代表分发了一份在线调查,询问与标签外使用疫苗相关的问题,包括参与者所在国家的NITAG政策、程序、立法和法规。世卫组织所有六个区域的答复者均被邀请参加。结果:来自76个国家的应答者(55%)是NITAG代表,45%是免疫规划管理人员或来自NITAG秘书处)。大多数受访者有52人(68%)表示他们的NITAG会提出标签外建议,18人(24%)表示他们的NITAG不会提出标签外建议,6人(8%)不确定他们的NITAG的作用。在大流行之前、期间和之后观察到的标签外疫苗建议有明显的转变。在2022年之前,25个(48%)答复者表示,他们的国家建议使用说明书外疫苗,11个(21%)指定的说明书外建议仅限于紧急情况,作为临时或有条件的扩展,6个(12%)不确定。2022年之后,30个(58%)答复者表示他们的国家推荐说明书外疫苗,4个(8%)指定说明书外建议仅限于紧急情况作为临时或有条件的扩展,18个(35%)选择不,0个(0%)不确定。虽然大多数国家提出标签外建议,但很少有国家(15%)制定了支持实施的政策和程序。结论:尽管世卫组织就nitag的任务和核心职能提供了广泛的指导,但在全球范围内,它们在标签外疫苗使用方面的任务和业务能力各不相同。这些发现表明,有必要提高对非说明书疫苗建议的认识,并就非说明书建议的实施加强对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Exploring off-label vaccine use: a survey of the global national immunization technical advisory group network.

Exploring off-label vaccine use: a survey of the global national immunization technical advisory group network.

Exploring off-label vaccine use: a survey of the global national immunization technical advisory group network.

Background: National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups (NITAGs) are crucial for enhancing vaccine use in immunization programs, particularly through off-label recommendations. This study sought to assess the adoption and trends of off-label vaccine recommendations made by NITAGs across low-, middle-, and high-income countries since the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: An online survey was distributed to NITAG representatives in World Health Organization (WHO) member states, asking questions related to off-label use of vaccines including policies, procedures, legislation, and regulations for NITAGs in participants' countries. Respondents across all six WHO regions were invited to participate.

Results: Respondents from 76 countries participated in the survey (55 %) were NITAG representatives, and 45 % were immunization program managers or from the NITAG secretariat). Most respondents 52 (68 %) reported their NITAG makes off-label recommendations, 18 (24 %) indicated their NITAG does not make off-label recommendations, and 6 (8 %) were unsure of their NITAG's role. There was a noticeable shift relating to off-label vaccine recommendations observed pre, during, and post-pandemic period. Prior to 2022, 25 (48 %) respondents indicated their country recommended off-label vaccines, 11 (21 %) specified off-label recommendations were limited to emergencies as temporary or conditional expansions, and 6 (12 %) were unsure. After 2022, 30 (58 %) respondents indicated their country recommended off-label vaccines, 4 (8 %) specified off-label recommendations were limited to emergencies as temporary or conditional expansions, 18 (35 %) selected no, and 0 (0%) were unsure. While most countries make off-label recommendations, few (15 %) have policies and procedures to support implementation.

Conclusions: Although WHO broadly provides guidance on the mandate and core functions of NITAGs, globally, they have differing mandates and operational capacities related to off-label vaccine use. These findings suggest the need for increased awareness of off-label vaccine recommendations and strengthened dialogue around implementation of off-label recommendations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信