从批评到安慰:长期护理保险的相关利益。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Xianhua Zai
{"title":"从批评到安慰:长期护理保险的相关利益。","authors":"Xianhua Zai","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.70026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study is to examine whether potentially eligible individuals with Partnership Long-Term Care Insurance (PLTCI) program experience stronger social networks and improved interpersonal relationships compared to those without coverage.</p><p><strong>Study setting and design: </strong>Our analysis utilizes data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), a longitudinal survey of U.S. adults aged 50 and older, incorporating responses from the Leave-Behind Questionnaire administered biennially from 2004 to 2018. We merge these data with a dataset tracking state-level implementation of the PLTCI program, enabling us to construct a binary indicator of policy exposure based on respondents' state of residence. Using ordinary least squares (OLS) regression with two-way fixed effects, we estimate the effect of the PLTCI program on the relational outcomes of aging individuals.</p><p><strong>Data sources and analytic sample: </strong>The analytic sample includes HRS respondents potentially eligible for the PLTCI program at the time of its implementation, focusing on respondents and their spouse no more than 65 years without physical limitations per Activities of Daily Living (ADL) criteria. Depending on data availability, the sample size ranges from approximately 13,000 to 17,000 participants.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>The PLTCI program improved perceived relationships with children and spouses. Older adults reported less frequent criticism (4.3% decrease with children, p = 0.04, 95% CI: 0.3%-8.3%; 3.4% with spouse, p = 0.04), feeling let down (3.9% decrease with children, p = 0.01; 3.8% with spouse, p = 0.009), or being annoyed (3.5% decrease with children, p = 0.03). They also felt more comfortable opening up about worries (2.1% increase with children) and relying on close family members during serious problems (3.0% increase with children, p = 0.01). These effects were strongest among individuals aged 55 and older compared to younger individuals, non-Hispanic White respondents compared to non-Hispanic Black respondents, and those with higher household wealth compared to those with lower household wealth.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Beyond financial security, the PLTCI program enhances older adults' social and emotional well-being by improving close relationships. These findings highlight the need to consider both economic and relational outcomes when evaluating long-term care policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":"e70026"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Criticism to Comfort: The Relational Benefits of Long-Term Care Insurance.\",\"authors\":\"Xianhua Zai\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1475-6773.70026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study is to examine whether potentially eligible individuals with Partnership Long-Term Care Insurance (PLTCI) program experience stronger social networks and improved interpersonal relationships compared to those without coverage.</p><p><strong>Study setting and design: </strong>Our analysis utilizes data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), a longitudinal survey of U.S. adults aged 50 and older, incorporating responses from the Leave-Behind Questionnaire administered biennially from 2004 to 2018. We merge these data with a dataset tracking state-level implementation of the PLTCI program, enabling us to construct a binary indicator of policy exposure based on respondents' state of residence. Using ordinary least squares (OLS) regression with two-way fixed effects, we estimate the effect of the PLTCI program on the relational outcomes of aging individuals.</p><p><strong>Data sources and analytic sample: </strong>The analytic sample includes HRS respondents potentially eligible for the PLTCI program at the time of its implementation, focusing on respondents and their spouse no more than 65 years without physical limitations per Activities of Daily Living (ADL) criteria. Depending on data availability, the sample size ranges from approximately 13,000 to 17,000 participants.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>The PLTCI program improved perceived relationships with children and spouses. Older adults reported less frequent criticism (4.3% decrease with children, p = 0.04, 95% CI: 0.3%-8.3%; 3.4% with spouse, p = 0.04), feeling let down (3.9% decrease with children, p = 0.01; 3.8% with spouse, p = 0.009), or being annoyed (3.5% decrease with children, p = 0.03). They also felt more comfortable opening up about worries (2.1% increase with children) and relying on close family members during serious problems (3.0% increase with children, p = 0.01). These effects were strongest among individuals aged 55 and older compared to younger individuals, non-Hispanic White respondents compared to non-Hispanic Black respondents, and those with higher household wealth compared to those with lower household wealth.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Beyond financial security, the PLTCI program enhances older adults' social and emotional well-being by improving close relationships. These findings highlight the need to consider both economic and relational outcomes when evaluating long-term care policies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Services Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e70026\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.70026\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.70026","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是检验是否潜在的符合条件的个人与伙伴关系长期护理保险(PLTCI)计划相比,有更强的社会网络和改善的人际关系。研究设置和设计:我们的分析利用了健康与退休研究(HRS)的数据,这是一项对50岁及以上的美国成年人进行的纵向调查,其中包括2004年至2018年每两年进行一次的“留守问卷”的回答。我们将这些数据与跟踪PLTCI计划在州一级实施的数据集合并,使我们能够基于受访者的居住状态构建政策敞口的二元指标。采用双向固定效应的普通最小二乘(OLS)回归,我们估计了PLTCI计划对衰老个体相关结果的影响。数据来源和分析样本:分析样本包括在实施PLTCI计划时可能符合条件的HRS受访者,重点关注受访者及其配偶不超过65岁,根据日常生活活动(ADL)标准没有身体限制。根据数据的可用性,样本量约为13,000至17,000名参与者。主要发现:PLTCI项目改善了与子女和配偶的感知关系。老年人报告的批评频率较低(儿童减少4.3%,p = 0.04, 95% CI: 0.3%-8.3%;有配偶的3.4%,p = 0.04),感到失望(有子女的3.9%下降,p = 0.01;3.8%与配偶相处,p = 0.009),或被惹恼(与孩子相处减少3.5%,p = 0.03)。她们也更愿意敞开心扉倾诉忧虑(有孩子时增加2.1%),在遇到严重问题时更愿意依靠亲密的家庭成员(有孩子时增加3.0%,p = 0.01)。与年轻人相比,55岁及以上的人,非西班牙裔白人受访者与非西班牙裔黑人受访者相比,家庭财富较高的人与家庭财富较低的人相比,这些影响最为明显。结论:除了经济安全,PLTCI计划还通过改善亲密关系来提高老年人的社会和情感健康。这些发现强调了在评估长期护理政策时需要同时考虑经济和相关结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From Criticism to Comfort: The Relational Benefits of Long-Term Care Insurance.

Objectives: The objective of this study is to examine whether potentially eligible individuals with Partnership Long-Term Care Insurance (PLTCI) program experience stronger social networks and improved interpersonal relationships compared to those without coverage.

Study setting and design: Our analysis utilizes data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), a longitudinal survey of U.S. adults aged 50 and older, incorporating responses from the Leave-Behind Questionnaire administered biennially from 2004 to 2018. We merge these data with a dataset tracking state-level implementation of the PLTCI program, enabling us to construct a binary indicator of policy exposure based on respondents' state of residence. Using ordinary least squares (OLS) regression with two-way fixed effects, we estimate the effect of the PLTCI program on the relational outcomes of aging individuals.

Data sources and analytic sample: The analytic sample includes HRS respondents potentially eligible for the PLTCI program at the time of its implementation, focusing on respondents and their spouse no more than 65 years without physical limitations per Activities of Daily Living (ADL) criteria. Depending on data availability, the sample size ranges from approximately 13,000 to 17,000 participants.

Principal findings: The PLTCI program improved perceived relationships with children and spouses. Older adults reported less frequent criticism (4.3% decrease with children, p = 0.04, 95% CI: 0.3%-8.3%; 3.4% with spouse, p = 0.04), feeling let down (3.9% decrease with children, p = 0.01; 3.8% with spouse, p = 0.009), or being annoyed (3.5% decrease with children, p = 0.03). They also felt more comfortable opening up about worries (2.1% increase with children) and relying on close family members during serious problems (3.0% increase with children, p = 0.01). These effects were strongest among individuals aged 55 and older compared to younger individuals, non-Hispanic White respondents compared to non-Hispanic Black respondents, and those with higher household wealth compared to those with lower household wealth.

Conclusions: Beyond financial security, the PLTCI program enhances older adults' social and emotional well-being by improving close relationships. These findings highlight the need to consider both economic and relational outcomes when evaluating long-term care policies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信