哪个因素对植入人工耳蜗的学龄儿童噪音中的言语感知影响更大:实足年龄还是植入年龄?

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Ecem Kartal Ozcan, Selvet Akkaplan, Merve Ozbal Batuk, Gonca Sennaroglu
{"title":"哪个因素对植入人工耳蜗的学龄儿童噪音中的言语感知影响更大:实足年龄还是植入年龄?","authors":"Ecem Kartal Ozcan, Selvet Akkaplan, Merve Ozbal Batuk, Gonca Sennaroglu","doi":"10.1044/2025_LSHSS-25-00028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aims of this study were to (a) investigate speech-in-noise perception using an adaptive procedure in school-aged children with bilateral cochlear implants (CIs); (b) evaluate the impact of chronological age, age at the second implantation, and interimplant interval on auditory performance in children with bilateral CIs; and (c) determine the correlation between speech recognition performance and subjective parental questionnaire scores.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 24 school-aged children with bilateral CIs participated in this study, divided into two groups: Group I (younger than 108 months of age, <i>n</i> = 12) and Group II (older than 108 months of age, <i>n</i> = 12). Speech recognition performance was assessed using sentences from the Turkish Hearing in Noise Test for Children under both quiet and noisy conditions at an adaptive signal-to-noise ratio. The auditory behavior of the children in daily life was evaluated by interviewing parents using the Parent's Evaluation of Aural/Oral Performance of Children (PEACH) scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Quiet and Noise Composite Scores of Group II were significantly better than those of Group I (<i>p</i> = .033 and <i>p</i> = .041, respectively). However, no significant difference was observed between the PEACH scores of the groups (<i>p</i> = .378). A significant correlation was found between PEACH scores and speech recognition performance under both quiet (<i>p</i> = .009) and noisy conditions (<i>p</i> = .021).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Chronological age had a greater impact on speech recognition performance than age at the second implantation and interimplant interval, emphasizing the role of age-related auditory development in speech perception. Additionally, parental perspective questionnaires may serve as a practical and efficient tool for assessing functional hearing abilities in children, particularly in educational settings where standard speech perception tests may not always be feasible.</p>","PeriodicalId":54326,"journal":{"name":"Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools","volume":" ","pages":"912-921"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Which Factor Has a Greater Impact on Speech Perception in Noise in School-Aged Children With Cochlear Implants: Chronological Age or Age at Implantation?\",\"authors\":\"Ecem Kartal Ozcan, Selvet Akkaplan, Merve Ozbal Batuk, Gonca Sennaroglu\",\"doi\":\"10.1044/2025_LSHSS-25-00028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aims of this study were to (a) investigate speech-in-noise perception using an adaptive procedure in school-aged children with bilateral cochlear implants (CIs); (b) evaluate the impact of chronological age, age at the second implantation, and interimplant interval on auditory performance in children with bilateral CIs; and (c) determine the correlation between speech recognition performance and subjective parental questionnaire scores.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 24 school-aged children with bilateral CIs participated in this study, divided into two groups: Group I (younger than 108 months of age, <i>n</i> = 12) and Group II (older than 108 months of age, <i>n</i> = 12). Speech recognition performance was assessed using sentences from the Turkish Hearing in Noise Test for Children under both quiet and noisy conditions at an adaptive signal-to-noise ratio. The auditory behavior of the children in daily life was evaluated by interviewing parents using the Parent's Evaluation of Aural/Oral Performance of Children (PEACH) scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Quiet and Noise Composite Scores of Group II were significantly better than those of Group I (<i>p</i> = .033 and <i>p</i> = .041, respectively). However, no significant difference was observed between the PEACH scores of the groups (<i>p</i> = .378). A significant correlation was found between PEACH scores and speech recognition performance under both quiet (<i>p</i> = .009) and noisy conditions (<i>p</i> = .021).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Chronological age had a greater impact on speech recognition performance than age at the second implantation and interimplant interval, emphasizing the role of age-related auditory development in speech perception. Additionally, parental perspective questionnaires may serve as a practical and efficient tool for assessing functional hearing abilities in children, particularly in educational settings where standard speech perception tests may not always be feasible.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"912-921\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_LSHSS-25-00028\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_LSHSS-25-00028","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是:(a)使用适应性程序研究双侧人工耳蜗学龄儿童的噪音语音感知;(b)评估实足年龄、第二次植入时年龄和植入间隔时间对双侧CIs患儿听觉表现的影响;(c)确定语音识别性能与父母主观问卷得分之间的相关性。方法:共24例双侧CIs学龄儿童,分为两组:I组(小于108月龄,n = 12)和II组(大于108月龄,n = 12)。在安静和嘈杂的条件下,采用自适应信噪比,使用土耳其语儿童听力噪音测试中的句子来评估语音识别性能。采用“儿童听觉/口语表现家长评价量表”(PEACH)对家长进行访谈,对儿童日常生活中的听觉行为进行评价。结果:II组安静、噪音综合评分显著优于I组(p = 0.033、p = 0.041)。然而,两组间的PEACH评分无显著差异(p = .378)。在安静(p = 0.009)和嘈杂(p = 0.021)条件下,PEACH分数与语音识别性能之间存在显著相关性。结论:实足年龄对语音识别能力的影响大于第二次种植年龄和种植间隔时间,强调了与年龄相关的听觉发育在语音感知中的作用。此外,父母观点问卷可以作为评估儿童功能性听力能力的实用和有效工具,特别是在标准言语感知测试可能并不总是可行的教育环境中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Which Factor Has a Greater Impact on Speech Perception in Noise in School-Aged Children With Cochlear Implants: Chronological Age or Age at Implantation?

Purpose: The aims of this study were to (a) investigate speech-in-noise perception using an adaptive procedure in school-aged children with bilateral cochlear implants (CIs); (b) evaluate the impact of chronological age, age at the second implantation, and interimplant interval on auditory performance in children with bilateral CIs; and (c) determine the correlation between speech recognition performance and subjective parental questionnaire scores.

Method: A total of 24 school-aged children with bilateral CIs participated in this study, divided into two groups: Group I (younger than 108 months of age, n = 12) and Group II (older than 108 months of age, n = 12). Speech recognition performance was assessed using sentences from the Turkish Hearing in Noise Test for Children under both quiet and noisy conditions at an adaptive signal-to-noise ratio. The auditory behavior of the children in daily life was evaluated by interviewing parents using the Parent's Evaluation of Aural/Oral Performance of Children (PEACH) scale.

Results: The Quiet and Noise Composite Scores of Group II were significantly better than those of Group I (p = .033 and p = .041, respectively). However, no significant difference was observed between the PEACH scores of the groups (p = .378). A significant correlation was found between PEACH scores and speech recognition performance under both quiet (p = .009) and noisy conditions (p = .021).

Conclusions: Chronological age had a greater impact on speech recognition performance than age at the second implantation and interimplant interval, emphasizing the role of age-related auditory development in speech perception. Additionally, parental perspective questionnaires may serve as a practical and efficient tool for assessing functional hearing abilities in children, particularly in educational settings where standard speech perception tests may not always be feasible.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools
Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
165
期刊介绍: Mission: LSHSS publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles pertaining to the practice of audiology and speech-language pathology in the schools, focusing on children and adolescents. The journal is an international outlet for clinical research and is designed to promote development and analysis of approaches concerning the delivery of services to the school-aged population. LSHSS seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of audiology and speech-language pathology as practiced in schools, including aural rehabilitation; augmentative and alternative communication; childhood apraxia of speech; classroom acoustics; cognitive impairment; craniofacial disorders; fluency disorders; hearing-assistive technology; language disorders; literacy disorders including reading, writing, and spelling; motor speech disorders; speech sound disorders; swallowing, dysphagia, and feeding disorders; voice disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信