迷幻药治疗标准的建立:安全性、包容性和问责制专家观点的定性检验。

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Christina Chwyl, Adrianne R Wilson-Poe, Kim A Hoffman, Alissa Bazinet, Kellie Pertl, Jason B Luoma, Don des Jarlais, Sarann Bielavitz, P Todd Korthuis
{"title":"迷幻药治疗标准的建立:安全性、包容性和问责制专家观点的定性检验。","authors":"Christina Chwyl, Adrianne R Wilson-Poe, Kim A Hoffman, Alissa Bazinet, Kellie Pertl, Jason B Luoma, Don des Jarlais, Sarann Bielavitz, P Todd Korthuis","doi":"10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There remain significant gaps in knowledge about best practices for facilitated psychedelic care and psychedelic-assisted therapy. To inform the development of service models that support safe and beneficial experiences, this qualitative study explored expert perspectives on current and ideal standards of care, including key practices (e.g., screening, adapting care to diverse contexts) and regulatory and research challenges that influence service delivery. Online focus groups (n = 8) were conducted with a purposive U.S. sample of people with psychedelic content knowledge expertise, including providers (psychiatrists, clinical psychologists, addiction medicine experts, and licensed/unlicensed practitioners) and harm reduction specialists. Transcripts were analyzed through Thematic Analysis team-based coding using a combined inductive-deductive approach within a semantic framework. Participants (N = 38, mean age 47 (SD = 10) years, 53 % women, 84 % white) had an average of 10 years of psychedelic service experience (SD = 11) across diverse settings, including festivals/events, service centers, and clinical, research, ceremonial, community and 'underground' contexts. Five key themes emerged: (1) 'Strengthening Safety through Credibility and Accountability'; (2) 'Advancing Culturally Responsive and Inclusive Psychedelic Care'; (3) 'Healing in Community: The Crucial Role of Ongoing Support and Integration'; (4) 'Ensuring Safe Psychedelic Use: Preparation, Screening, Vulnerability, and Medication Management'; and (5) 'Providing Informed Guidance and Navigating Legal and Informational Gray Areas.' Overall, results underscore the need for stronger provider accountability structures, culturally inclusive practices, accessible and integrated community support, robust safety and screening protocols, and clearer guidelines to help providers navigate legal complexities, ensure safety, and optimize outcomes across diverse populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":48364,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Drug Policy","volume":" ","pages":"104938"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Building standards of psychedelic care: Qualitative examination of expert perspectives on safety, inclusion, and accountability.\",\"authors\":\"Christina Chwyl, Adrianne R Wilson-Poe, Kim A Hoffman, Alissa Bazinet, Kellie Pertl, Jason B Luoma, Don des Jarlais, Sarann Bielavitz, P Todd Korthuis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104938\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There remain significant gaps in knowledge about best practices for facilitated psychedelic care and psychedelic-assisted therapy. To inform the development of service models that support safe and beneficial experiences, this qualitative study explored expert perspectives on current and ideal standards of care, including key practices (e.g., screening, adapting care to diverse contexts) and regulatory and research challenges that influence service delivery. Online focus groups (n = 8) were conducted with a purposive U.S. sample of people with psychedelic content knowledge expertise, including providers (psychiatrists, clinical psychologists, addiction medicine experts, and licensed/unlicensed practitioners) and harm reduction specialists. Transcripts were analyzed through Thematic Analysis team-based coding using a combined inductive-deductive approach within a semantic framework. Participants (N = 38, mean age 47 (SD = 10) years, 53 % women, 84 % white) had an average of 10 years of psychedelic service experience (SD = 11) across diverse settings, including festivals/events, service centers, and clinical, research, ceremonial, community and 'underground' contexts. Five key themes emerged: (1) 'Strengthening Safety through Credibility and Accountability'; (2) 'Advancing Culturally Responsive and Inclusive Psychedelic Care'; (3) 'Healing in Community: The Crucial Role of Ongoing Support and Integration'; (4) 'Ensuring Safe Psychedelic Use: Preparation, Screening, Vulnerability, and Medication Management'; and (5) 'Providing Informed Guidance and Navigating Legal and Informational Gray Areas.' Overall, results underscore the need for stronger provider accountability structures, culturally inclusive practices, accessible and integrated community support, robust safety and screening protocols, and clearer guidelines to help providers navigate legal complexities, ensure safety, and optimize outcomes across diverse populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Drug Policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"104938\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Drug Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104938\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Drug Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104938","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在促进致幻剂护理和致幻剂辅助治疗的最佳实践方面,仍存在显著的知识差距。为了为支持安全和有益体验的服务模式的发展提供信息,本定性研究探讨了专家对当前和理想护理标准的看法,包括关键实践(例如,筛查、使护理适应不同情况)以及影响服务提供的监管和研究挑战。在线焦点小组(n = 8)由具有致幻剂内容知识专业知识的美国人组成,包括提供者(精神科医生、临床心理学家、成瘾医学专家和有执照/无执照的从业者)和减少危害专家。通过基于主题分析团队的编码,在语义框架内使用组合的归纳-演绎方法分析转录本。参与者(N = 38,平均年龄47 (SD = 10)岁,53%的女性,84%的白人)平均有10年的迷幻药服务经历(SD = 11),包括节日/活动、服务中心、临床、研究、仪式、社区和“地下”环境。出现了五个关键主题:(1)“以诚信和问责加强安全”;(2)“促进文化响应和包容性迷幻药护理”;(3)“社区治疗:持续支持和融合的关键作用”;(4)确保安全使用致幻剂:制备、筛选、脆弱性和药物管理;和(5)“提供明智的指导,穿越法律和信息的灰色地带。”总体而言,结果强调需要建立更强大的提供者问责结构、文化包容性实践、可获得和综合的社区支持、健全的安全和筛查协议,以及更明确的指导方针,以帮助提供者应对法律复杂性、确保安全并优化不同人群的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Building standards of psychedelic care: Qualitative examination of expert perspectives on safety, inclusion, and accountability.

There remain significant gaps in knowledge about best practices for facilitated psychedelic care and psychedelic-assisted therapy. To inform the development of service models that support safe and beneficial experiences, this qualitative study explored expert perspectives on current and ideal standards of care, including key practices (e.g., screening, adapting care to diverse contexts) and regulatory and research challenges that influence service delivery. Online focus groups (n = 8) were conducted with a purposive U.S. sample of people with psychedelic content knowledge expertise, including providers (psychiatrists, clinical psychologists, addiction medicine experts, and licensed/unlicensed practitioners) and harm reduction specialists. Transcripts were analyzed through Thematic Analysis team-based coding using a combined inductive-deductive approach within a semantic framework. Participants (N = 38, mean age 47 (SD = 10) years, 53 % women, 84 % white) had an average of 10 years of psychedelic service experience (SD = 11) across diverse settings, including festivals/events, service centers, and clinical, research, ceremonial, community and 'underground' contexts. Five key themes emerged: (1) 'Strengthening Safety through Credibility and Accountability'; (2) 'Advancing Culturally Responsive and Inclusive Psychedelic Care'; (3) 'Healing in Community: The Crucial Role of Ongoing Support and Integration'; (4) 'Ensuring Safe Psychedelic Use: Preparation, Screening, Vulnerability, and Medication Management'; and (5) 'Providing Informed Guidance and Navigating Legal and Informational Gray Areas.' Overall, results underscore the need for stronger provider accountability structures, culturally inclusive practices, accessible and integrated community support, robust safety and screening protocols, and clearer guidelines to help providers navigate legal complexities, ensure safety, and optimize outcomes across diverse populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.40%
发文量
307
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Drug Policy provides a forum for the dissemination of current research, reviews, debate, and critical analysis on drug use and drug policy in a global context. It seeks to publish material on the social, political, legal, and health contexts of psychoactive substance use, both licit and illicit. The journal is particularly concerned to explore the effects of drug policy and practice on drug-using behaviour and its health and social consequences. It is the policy of the journal to represent a wide range of material on drug-related matters from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信