减少农村卫生服务系统的日常实验室检测:见解与挑战。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Greeshma Sheri, Pranaya Pakala, Dmitry Tumin, James R Manning, Yaolin Zhou
{"title":"减少农村卫生服务系统的日常实验室检测:见解与挑战。","authors":"Greeshma Sheri, Pranaya Pakala, Dmitry Tumin, James R Manning, Yaolin Zhou","doi":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Laboratory test utilization initiatives are well-studied in academic centers but less so in rural and community hospitals. We applied the EPIDEM model (exploration, promotion, implementation, documentation, evaluation, modification) across a nine-hospital, predominantly rural health system to reduce unnecessary daily laboratory tests.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>At the medical center, we began engaging key partners in October 2020 through targeted in-person meetings. Electronic health record (EHR) interventions (removing daily ×3 ordering, Choosing Wisely reminders, interval-based ordering restrictions) started system-wide in April 2021. Regional hospitals received EHR interventions and educational materials only.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After clinical leadership approval in December 2020, our initiative's popularity accelerated, as groups requested inclusion. Across the health system, there was a 6%-20% reduction in tests per inpatient day. At the medical center, ordering decreased in December 2020 and dropped further with each EHR intervention. Unlike the sustained improvement observed at the medical center, ordering initially increased in the regional hospitals, decreased with each EHR intervention, but ultimately returned near baseline levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Social and behavioral strategies are essential for sustaining daily laboratory test reduction efforts. Lasting cultural change may require local champions at each hospital. The EPIDEM model prioritizes relational and contextual factors, enabling quality improvement even in resource-limited settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":48801,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reducing Daily Laboratory Tests in a Rural-Serving Health System: Insights and Challenges.\",\"authors\":\"Greeshma Sheri, Pranaya Pakala, Dmitry Tumin, James R Manning, Yaolin Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000487\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Laboratory test utilization initiatives are well-studied in academic centers but less so in rural and community hospitals. We applied the EPIDEM model (exploration, promotion, implementation, documentation, evaluation, modification) across a nine-hospital, predominantly rural health system to reduce unnecessary daily laboratory tests.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>At the medical center, we began engaging key partners in October 2020 through targeted in-person meetings. Electronic health record (EHR) interventions (removing daily ×3 ordering, Choosing Wisely reminders, interval-based ordering restrictions) started system-wide in April 2021. Regional hospitals received EHR interventions and educational materials only.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After clinical leadership approval in December 2020, our initiative's popularity accelerated, as groups requested inclusion. Across the health system, there was a 6%-20% reduction in tests per inpatient day. At the medical center, ordering decreased in December 2020 and dropped further with each EHR intervention. Unlike the sustained improvement observed at the medical center, ordering initially increased in the regional hospitals, decreased with each EHR intervention, but ultimately returned near baseline levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Social and behavioral strategies are essential for sustaining daily laboratory test reduction efforts. Lasting cultural change may require local champions at each hospital. The EPIDEM model prioritizes relational and contextual factors, enabling quality improvement even in resource-limited settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Healthcare Quality\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Healthcare Quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000487\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000487","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:实验室测试的利用主动性在学术中心得到了很好的研究,但在农村和社区医院则较少。我们将流行病模型(探索、推广、实施、记录、评估、修改)应用于9家医院,主要是农村卫生系统,以减少不必要的日常实验室检测。方法:在医疗中心,我们于2020年10月开始通过有针对性的面对面会议与关键合作伙伴进行接触。电子健康记录(EHR)干预措施(取消每日×3订购、明智选择提醒、基于间隔的订购限制)于2021年4月在全系统范围内启动。地区医院只收到电子病历干预措施和教育材料。结果:在2020年12月临床领导批准后,随着团体要求纳入,我们的倡议的普及程度加快了。在整个卫生系统中,每个住院病人每天的检查减少了6%-20%。在医疗中心,订购量在2020年12月下降,并且随着每次电子病历干预而进一步下降。与在医疗中心观察到的持续改善不同,地区医院的订货量最初有所增加,随着每次电子病历干预而减少,但最终恢复到接近基线水平。结论:社会和行为策略是维持日常实验室测试减少努力必不可少的。持久的文化变革可能需要每家医院的本地拥护者。流行病模型优先考虑关系和环境因素,即使在资源有限的情况下也能提高质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reducing Daily Laboratory Tests in a Rural-Serving Health System: Insights and Challenges.

Introduction: Laboratory test utilization initiatives are well-studied in academic centers but less so in rural and community hospitals. We applied the EPIDEM model (exploration, promotion, implementation, documentation, evaluation, modification) across a nine-hospital, predominantly rural health system to reduce unnecessary daily laboratory tests.

Methods: At the medical center, we began engaging key partners in October 2020 through targeted in-person meetings. Electronic health record (EHR) interventions (removing daily ×3 ordering, Choosing Wisely reminders, interval-based ordering restrictions) started system-wide in April 2021. Regional hospitals received EHR interventions and educational materials only.

Results: After clinical leadership approval in December 2020, our initiative's popularity accelerated, as groups requested inclusion. Across the health system, there was a 6%-20% reduction in tests per inpatient day. At the medical center, ordering decreased in December 2020 and dropped further with each EHR intervention. Unlike the sustained improvement observed at the medical center, ordering initially increased in the regional hospitals, decreased with each EHR intervention, but ultimately returned near baseline levels.

Conclusions: Social and behavioral strategies are essential for sustaining daily laboratory test reduction efforts. Lasting cultural change may require local champions at each hospital. The EPIDEM model prioritizes relational and contextual factors, enabling quality improvement even in resource-limited settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Healthcare Quality
Journal for Healthcare Quality HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal for Healthcare Quality (JHQ), a peer-reviewed journal, is an official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality. JHQ is a professional forum that continuously advances healthcare quality practice in diverse and changing environments, and is the first choice for creative and scientific solutions in the pursuit of healthcare quality. It has been selected for coverage in Thomson Reuter’s Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Sciences Citation Index®, and Current Contents®. The Journal publishes scholarly articles that are targeted to leaders of all healthcare settings, leveraging applied research and producing practical, timely and impactful evidence in healthcare system transformation. The journal covers topics such as: Quality Improvement • Patient Safety • Performance Measurement • Best Practices in Clinical and Operational Processes • Innovation • Leadership • Information Technology • Spreading Improvement • Sustaining Improvement • Cost Reduction • Payment Reform
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信