英夫利昔单抗与Vedolizumab治疗免疫检查点抑制剂诱导结肠炎的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析

IF 2.2 Q3 ONCOLOGY
World Journal of Oncology Pub Date : 2025-07-26 eCollection Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.14740/wjon2613
Shreya Shambhavi, Harmanjeet Singh, Ganesh Ramaprasad, Murod Khikmatov, Varun Vankeshwaram, Kumar Ashish, Carlos Valladares, Tanushree Bhatt, Seth D Cohen
{"title":"英夫利昔单抗与Vedolizumab治疗免疫检查点抑制剂诱导结肠炎的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析","authors":"Shreya Shambhavi, Harmanjeet Singh, Ganesh Ramaprasad, Murod Khikmatov, Varun Vankeshwaram, Kumar Ashish, Carlos Valladares, Tanushree Bhatt, Seth D Cohen","doi":"10.14740/wjon2613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can cause severe gastrointestinal immune-related adverse events (irAEs), often leading to treatment interruption and increased morbidity. Immune-mediated colitis (IMC) ranges from mild diarrhea to life-threatening colitis, sometimes requiring urgent intervention. While corticosteroids are the first-line treatment, selective immunosuppressive therapy (SIT) with either infliximab or vedolizumab is used for steroid-refractory or dependent cases. However, standardized practices are lacking, and treatment decisions are largely left to provider discretion. This study compares infliximab and vedolizumab for IMC, focusing on remission rates, recurrence, SIT dosing, and systemic steroid exposure duration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified six retrospective cohort studies that compared infliximab with vedolizumab in the treatment of IMC through a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, CINAHL, Google Scholar, and Web of Science in English from inception until October 2024. From the identified literature, we extracted pertinent data such as remission and recurrence of IMC. Pooled analysis and heterogeneity analysis were performed using R Studio version 4.4.1. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of six studies with 645 patients were included. In ICI-associated colitis, vedolizumab was associated with lower recurrence rates (odds ratio (OR): 0.29, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.15 - 0.54) and shorter systemic steroid exposure (mean difference (MD): -16.88 days, 95% CI: -20.47 to -13.30) compared to infliximab. While vedolizumab showed improved remission, there was no statistically significant difference in remission rates between vedolizumab and infliximab monotherapy (OR: 3.16, 95% CI: 0.29 - 34.01). Remission was achieved with fewer doses of infliximab than vedolizumab (MD: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.09 - 2.22). The mean number of vedolizumab doses was 2.57 (raw mean score (MRAW): 2.57, 95% CI: 1.43 - 2.71), while the mean number of infliximab doses was 1.36 (MRAW: 1.36, 95% CI: 0.69 - 2.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients with ICI-induced colitis, vedolizumab demonstrated superiority over infliximab by being associated with lower rates of colitis recurrence and decreased systemic steroid exposure, although it required a higher number of doses compared to infliximab.</p>","PeriodicalId":46797,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Oncology","volume":"16 4","pages":"331-341"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12339259/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Infliximab Versus Vedolizumab in the Management of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Shreya Shambhavi, Harmanjeet Singh, Ganesh Ramaprasad, Murod Khikmatov, Varun Vankeshwaram, Kumar Ashish, Carlos Valladares, Tanushree Bhatt, Seth D Cohen\",\"doi\":\"10.14740/wjon2613\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can cause severe gastrointestinal immune-related adverse events (irAEs), often leading to treatment interruption and increased morbidity. Immune-mediated colitis (IMC) ranges from mild diarrhea to life-threatening colitis, sometimes requiring urgent intervention. While corticosteroids are the first-line treatment, selective immunosuppressive therapy (SIT) with either infliximab or vedolizumab is used for steroid-refractory or dependent cases. However, standardized practices are lacking, and treatment decisions are largely left to provider discretion. This study compares infliximab and vedolizumab for IMC, focusing on remission rates, recurrence, SIT dosing, and systemic steroid exposure duration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified six retrospective cohort studies that compared infliximab with vedolizumab in the treatment of IMC through a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, CINAHL, Google Scholar, and Web of Science in English from inception until October 2024. From the identified literature, we extracted pertinent data such as remission and recurrence of IMC. Pooled analysis and heterogeneity analysis were performed using R Studio version 4.4.1. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of six studies with 645 patients were included. In ICI-associated colitis, vedolizumab was associated with lower recurrence rates (odds ratio (OR): 0.29, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.15 - 0.54) and shorter systemic steroid exposure (mean difference (MD): -16.88 days, 95% CI: -20.47 to -13.30) compared to infliximab. While vedolizumab showed improved remission, there was no statistically significant difference in remission rates between vedolizumab and infliximab monotherapy (OR: 3.16, 95% CI: 0.29 - 34.01). Remission was achieved with fewer doses of infliximab than vedolizumab (MD: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.09 - 2.22). The mean number of vedolizumab doses was 2.57 (raw mean score (MRAW): 2.57, 95% CI: 1.43 - 2.71), while the mean number of infliximab doses was 1.36 (MRAW: 1.36, 95% CI: 0.69 - 2.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients with ICI-induced colitis, vedolizumab demonstrated superiority over infliximab by being associated with lower rates of colitis recurrence and decreased systemic steroid exposure, although it required a higher number of doses compared to infliximab.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46797,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Oncology\",\"volume\":\"16 4\",\"pages\":\"331-341\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12339259/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14740/wjon2613\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14740/wjon2613","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)可引起严重的胃肠道免疫相关不良事件(irAEs),通常导致治疗中断和发病率增加。免疫介导性结肠炎(IMC)的范围从轻度腹泻到危及生命的结肠炎,有时需要紧急干预。虽然皮质类固醇是一线治疗,但选择性免疫抑制疗法(SIT)联合英夫利昔单抗或维多单抗用于类固醇难治性或依赖性病例。然而,缺乏标准化的做法,治疗决定在很大程度上取决于提供者的自由裁量权。本研究比较了英夫利昔单抗和维多单抗治疗IMC的疗效,重点关注缓解率、复发率、SIT剂量和全身类固醇暴露时间。方法:我们通过系统检索PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane Library、Scopus、CINAHL、谷歌Scholar和Web of Science从成立到2024年10月的英文版本,确定了6项回顾性队列研究,比较了英夫利昔单抗和维多单抗治疗IMC的疗效。从已识别的文献中,我们提取了相关数据,如IMC的缓解和复发。采用R Studio 4.4.1版本进行合并分析和异质性分析。偏倚风险采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行评估。结果:共纳入6项研究,645例患者。在ici相关性结肠炎中,与英夫利昔单抗相比,vedolizumab具有较低的复发率(优势比(OR): 0.29, 95%可信区间(CI): 0.15 - 0.54)和较短的全身类固醇暴露(平均差(MD): -16.88天,95% CI: -20.47至-13.30)。虽然vedolizumab改善了缓解,但vedolizumab和英夫利昔单抗单药治疗的缓解率无统计学差异(OR: 3.16, 95% CI: 0.29 - 34.01)。英夫利昔单抗比维多单抗剂量更少,达到缓解(MD: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.09 - 2.22)。vedolizumab的平均剂量为2.57(原始平均评分(MRAW): 2.57, 95% CI: 1.43 - 2.71),而英夫利昔单抗的平均剂量为1.36 (MRAW: 1.36, 95% CI: 0.69 - 2.02)。结论:在ici诱导的结肠炎患者中,vedolizumab表现出优于英夫利昔单抗的优势,尽管与英夫利昔单抗相比,它需要更多的剂量,但与结肠炎复发率较低和全身类固醇暴露减少相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of Infliximab Versus Vedolizumab in the Management of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can cause severe gastrointestinal immune-related adverse events (irAEs), often leading to treatment interruption and increased morbidity. Immune-mediated colitis (IMC) ranges from mild diarrhea to life-threatening colitis, sometimes requiring urgent intervention. While corticosteroids are the first-line treatment, selective immunosuppressive therapy (SIT) with either infliximab or vedolizumab is used for steroid-refractory or dependent cases. However, standardized practices are lacking, and treatment decisions are largely left to provider discretion. This study compares infliximab and vedolizumab for IMC, focusing on remission rates, recurrence, SIT dosing, and systemic steroid exposure duration.

Methods: We identified six retrospective cohort studies that compared infliximab with vedolizumab in the treatment of IMC through a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, CINAHL, Google Scholar, and Web of Science in English from inception until October 2024. From the identified literature, we extracted pertinent data such as remission and recurrence of IMC. Pooled analysis and heterogeneity analysis were performed using R Studio version 4.4.1. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

Results: A total of six studies with 645 patients were included. In ICI-associated colitis, vedolizumab was associated with lower recurrence rates (odds ratio (OR): 0.29, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.15 - 0.54) and shorter systemic steroid exposure (mean difference (MD): -16.88 days, 95% CI: -20.47 to -13.30) compared to infliximab. While vedolizumab showed improved remission, there was no statistically significant difference in remission rates between vedolizumab and infliximab monotherapy (OR: 3.16, 95% CI: 0.29 - 34.01). Remission was achieved with fewer doses of infliximab than vedolizumab (MD: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.09 - 2.22). The mean number of vedolizumab doses was 2.57 (raw mean score (MRAW): 2.57, 95% CI: 1.43 - 2.71), while the mean number of infliximab doses was 1.36 (MRAW: 1.36, 95% CI: 0.69 - 2.02).

Conclusions: Among patients with ICI-induced colitis, vedolizumab demonstrated superiority over infliximab by being associated with lower rates of colitis recurrence and decreased systemic steroid exposure, although it required a higher number of doses compared to infliximab.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
15.40%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: World Journal of Oncology, bimonthly, publishes original contributions describing basic research and clinical investigation of cancer, on the cellular, molecular, prevention, diagnosis, therapy and prognosis aspects. The submissions can be basic research or clinical investigation oriented. This journal welcomes those submissions focused on the clinical trials of new treatment modalities for cancer, and those submissions focused on molecular or cellular research of the oncology pathogenesis. Case reports submitted for consideration of publication should explore either a novel genomic event/description or a new safety signal from an oncolytic agent. The areas of interested manuscripts are these disciplines: tumor immunology and immunotherapy; cancer molecular pharmacology and chemotherapy; drug sensitivity and resistance; cancer epidemiology; clinical trials; cancer pathology; radiobiology and radiation oncology; solid tumor oncology; hematological malignancies; surgical oncology; pediatric oncology; molecular oncology and cancer genes; gene therapy; cancer endocrinology; cancer metastasis; prevention and diagnosis of cancer; other cancer related subjects. The types of manuscripts accepted are original article, review, editorial, short communication, case report, letter to the editor, book review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信