基于数百个核基因的仙人掌科系统基因组学与分类。

IF 1.6 3区 生物学 Q4 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Plant Systematics and Evolution Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-11 DOI:10.1007/s00606-025-01948-z
Jurriaan M de Vos, Urs Eggli, Reto Nyffeler, Isabel Larridon, Catherine McGinnie, Niroshini Epitawalage, Olivier Maurin, Félix Forest, William J Baker
{"title":"基于数百个核基因的仙人掌科系统基因组学与分类。","authors":"Jurriaan M de Vos, Urs Eggli, Reto Nyffeler, Isabel Larridon, Catherine McGinnie, Niroshini Epitawalage, Olivier Maurin, Félix Forest, William J Baker","doi":"10.1007/s00606-025-01948-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Phylogenetic classification based on evolutionary relationships is the standard approach in systematics, but Cactaceae has posed significant challenges due to the signature of its rapid radiation: low sequence divergence hindering phylogenetic resolution and enormous species diversity hindering attempts to adequately reflect phylogenetic diversity. Previous classifications mostly relied on joint assessment of multiple phylogenetic studies and/or intuition on morphological evolution, lacking comprehensive genomic analysis. Here, we propose a revised phylogenetic classification of Cactaceae, based on the Angiosperms353 set of phylogenomic markers, including 170 species, covering close to 90% of genera and common segregates. Coalescent-based gene tree-species tree reconciliation reveals a well-resolved phylogenetic backbone, mostly congruent with a previous plastid DNA-based summary phylogeny. Some unresolved areas surrounding the subfamilies Cactoideae and Pereskioideae remain however, where gene concordance analyses reveal complex evolutionary histories. We formally recognize the four traditional subfamilies Pereskioideae, Opuntioideae, Maihuenioideae, and Cactoideae, plus Blossfeldioideae and Leuenbergerioideae. Four subfamilies are monogeneric, while within Opuntioideae, we recognize three tribes (Opuntieae, Cylindropuntieae, and Pterocacteae) and within Cactoideae, we recognize eight tribes: Lymanbensonieae, Copiapoeae, Cacteae (incl. subtribes Echinocactinae, Ferocactinae, Cactinae), Phyllocacteae (incl. subtribes Corryocactinae, newly recognized Leptocereinae, Hylocereinae, Echinocereinae), Fraileae, Rhipsalideae, Notocacteae, and Cereeae (incl. subtribes Aylosterinae, Rebutiinae, Gymnocalyciinae, Cereinae, newly recognized Reicheocactinae, Trichocereinae). Our completely revised classification for all clades includes full generic synonymy accepting 155 genera. Overall, the phylogenetic structure of Cactaceae mirrors the angiosperm-wide pattern of enigmatic, species-poor lineages dispersed amongst clades that are orders of magnitude more species rich, revealing a mix of nested, 'explosive' radiations and orphan lineages.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00606-025-01948-z.</p>","PeriodicalId":20187,"journal":{"name":"Plant Systematics and Evolution","volume":"311 5","pages":"28"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12339657/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phylogenomics and classification of Cactaceae based on hundreds of nuclear genes.\",\"authors\":\"Jurriaan M de Vos, Urs Eggli, Reto Nyffeler, Isabel Larridon, Catherine McGinnie, Niroshini Epitawalage, Olivier Maurin, Félix Forest, William J Baker\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00606-025-01948-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Phylogenetic classification based on evolutionary relationships is the standard approach in systematics, but Cactaceae has posed significant challenges due to the signature of its rapid radiation: low sequence divergence hindering phylogenetic resolution and enormous species diversity hindering attempts to adequately reflect phylogenetic diversity. Previous classifications mostly relied on joint assessment of multiple phylogenetic studies and/or intuition on morphological evolution, lacking comprehensive genomic analysis. Here, we propose a revised phylogenetic classification of Cactaceae, based on the Angiosperms353 set of phylogenomic markers, including 170 species, covering close to 90% of genera and common segregates. Coalescent-based gene tree-species tree reconciliation reveals a well-resolved phylogenetic backbone, mostly congruent with a previous plastid DNA-based summary phylogeny. Some unresolved areas surrounding the subfamilies Cactoideae and Pereskioideae remain however, where gene concordance analyses reveal complex evolutionary histories. We formally recognize the four traditional subfamilies Pereskioideae, Opuntioideae, Maihuenioideae, and Cactoideae, plus Blossfeldioideae and Leuenbergerioideae. Four subfamilies are monogeneric, while within Opuntioideae, we recognize three tribes (Opuntieae, Cylindropuntieae, and Pterocacteae) and within Cactoideae, we recognize eight tribes: Lymanbensonieae, Copiapoeae, Cacteae (incl. subtribes Echinocactinae, Ferocactinae, Cactinae), Phyllocacteae (incl. subtribes Corryocactinae, newly recognized Leptocereinae, Hylocereinae, Echinocereinae), Fraileae, Rhipsalideae, Notocacteae, and Cereeae (incl. subtribes Aylosterinae, Rebutiinae, Gymnocalyciinae, Cereinae, newly recognized Reicheocactinae, Trichocereinae). Our completely revised classification for all clades includes full generic synonymy accepting 155 genera. Overall, the phylogenetic structure of Cactaceae mirrors the angiosperm-wide pattern of enigmatic, species-poor lineages dispersed amongst clades that are orders of magnitude more species rich, revealing a mix of nested, 'explosive' radiations and orphan lineages.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00606-025-01948-z.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant Systematics and Evolution\",\"volume\":\"311 5\",\"pages\":\"28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12339657/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant Systematics and Evolution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-025-01948-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Systematics and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-025-01948-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于进化关系的系统发育分类是系统学的标准方法,但由于其快速辐射的特征,cacacae面临着重大挑战:低序列分化阻碍了系统发育分辨率,巨大的物种多样性阻碍了充分反映系统发育多样性的尝试。以前的分类大多依赖于多种系统发育研究的联合评估和/或形态进化的直觉,缺乏全面的基因组分析。本文以被子植物(Angiosperms353)的系统发育标记为基础,提出了一种新的仙人掌科系统发育分类方法,包括170个种,覆盖近90%的属和共同分离。基于聚结的基因树-物种树和解揭示了一个很好解决的系统发育骨干,与先前基于质体dna的总结系统发育基本一致。然而,围绕仙人掌亚科和仙人掌亚科的一些未解决的区域仍然存在,基因一致性分析揭示了复杂的进化历史。我们正式承认四个传统亚科,即Pereskioideae、Opuntioideae、Maihuenioideae和Cactoideae,以及blossfeldiideae和Leuenbergerioideae。四个亚科是单属的,而在Opuntioideae中,我们可以识别出三个部落(Opuntieae,圆柱形untieae和Pterocacteae),在Cactoideae中,我们可以识别出八个部落:lymanbensoniae, Copiapoeae, cateae(包括棘皮亚科,Ferocactinae, catinae), Phyllocacteae(包括Corryocactinae, Leptocereinae, hyloceinae, echinoceinae), fileae, Rhipsalideae, notocateae和cereae(包括Aylosterinae, butitiinae, Gymnocalyciinae, cerinae,新认识的Reicheocactinae, Trichocereinae)。我们对所有进化支的分类进行了全面修订,包括155个属的全属同义词。总的来说,仙人掌科的系统发育结构反映了被子植物范围内神秘的、物种匮乏的谱系分布在物种丰富程度更高的分支中的模式,揭示了巢状、“爆炸性”辐射和孤儿谱系的混合。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,可在10.1007/s00606-025-01948-z获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Phylogenomics and classification of Cactaceae based on hundreds of nuclear genes.

Phylogenetic classification based on evolutionary relationships is the standard approach in systematics, but Cactaceae has posed significant challenges due to the signature of its rapid radiation: low sequence divergence hindering phylogenetic resolution and enormous species diversity hindering attempts to adequately reflect phylogenetic diversity. Previous classifications mostly relied on joint assessment of multiple phylogenetic studies and/or intuition on morphological evolution, lacking comprehensive genomic analysis. Here, we propose a revised phylogenetic classification of Cactaceae, based on the Angiosperms353 set of phylogenomic markers, including 170 species, covering close to 90% of genera and common segregates. Coalescent-based gene tree-species tree reconciliation reveals a well-resolved phylogenetic backbone, mostly congruent with a previous plastid DNA-based summary phylogeny. Some unresolved areas surrounding the subfamilies Cactoideae and Pereskioideae remain however, where gene concordance analyses reveal complex evolutionary histories. We formally recognize the four traditional subfamilies Pereskioideae, Opuntioideae, Maihuenioideae, and Cactoideae, plus Blossfeldioideae and Leuenbergerioideae. Four subfamilies are monogeneric, while within Opuntioideae, we recognize three tribes (Opuntieae, Cylindropuntieae, and Pterocacteae) and within Cactoideae, we recognize eight tribes: Lymanbensonieae, Copiapoeae, Cacteae (incl. subtribes Echinocactinae, Ferocactinae, Cactinae), Phyllocacteae (incl. subtribes Corryocactinae, newly recognized Leptocereinae, Hylocereinae, Echinocereinae), Fraileae, Rhipsalideae, Notocacteae, and Cereeae (incl. subtribes Aylosterinae, Rebutiinae, Gymnocalyciinae, Cereinae, newly recognized Reicheocactinae, Trichocereinae). Our completely revised classification for all clades includes full generic synonymy accepting 155 genera. Overall, the phylogenetic structure of Cactaceae mirrors the angiosperm-wide pattern of enigmatic, species-poor lineages dispersed amongst clades that are orders of magnitude more species rich, revealing a mix of nested, 'explosive' radiations and orphan lineages.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00606-025-01948-z.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Plant Systematics and Evolution
Plant Systematics and Evolution 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
15.80%
发文量
37
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Plant Systematics and Evolution is an international journal dedicated to publication of peer-reviewed original papers and reviews on plant systematics in the broadest sense. The journal aims to bridge the specific subject areas in plant systematics and evolution, encompassing evolutionary, phylogenetic, genomic and biogeographical studies at the population and higher taxonomic levels. Taxonomic emphasis is on all land plant groups in a wide sense, including fungi and lichens.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信