Dexcom G6 Pro连续血糖监测仪在重症监护环境中的准确性:严密ICU G6研究。

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Jagdeesh Ullal, Charles Spanbauer, Jesica D Baran, Rajlaxmi Bais, Hou-Hsien Chiang, Jing H Chao, Dori Khakpour, Patrisia Panfil, Francisco J Pasquel, Nikola Gligorijevic, Morgan S Jones, Cecilia C Low Wang, John B Buse, Boris Draznin, Judy Sibayan, Craig Kollman, Roy W Beck, Irl B Hirsch
{"title":"Dexcom G6 Pro连续血糖监测仪在重症监护环境中的准确性:严密ICU G6研究。","authors":"Jagdeesh Ullal, Charles Spanbauer, Jesica D Baran, Rajlaxmi Bais, Hou-Hsien Chiang, Jing H Chao, Dori Khakpour, Patrisia Panfil, Francisco J Pasquel, Nikola Gligorijevic, Morgan S Jones, Cecilia C Low Wang, John B Buse, Boris Draznin, Judy Sibayan, Craig Kollman, Roy W Beck, Irl B Hirsch","doi":"10.1177/15209156251368933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> To evaluate the accuracy of the Dexcom G6 Pro continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We performed a prospective, observational, multicenter study in adult ICU patients with a known diagnosis of diabetes or stress hyperglycemia who were being treated with insulin. Two Dexcom G6 Pro sensors were placed. Sensor accuracy was assessed by pairing sensor and blood glucose (BG) measurements obtained as a part of usual ICU care. Accuracy of the G6 Pro also was assessed concurrently in non-ICU hospitalized individuals. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 130 participants were enrolled, with mean (±SD) age of 62 ± 12 years, and preexisting diabetes was present in 73% and stress hyperglycemia in 27%. A total of 9120 sensor-BG pairs were analyzed. The mean relative absolute difference (RAD) was 23% (median 19%), with a mean difference of +25 mg/dL (median 25 mg/dL). Forty-one percent of sensor glucose values were within 15% of BG values for BG values ≥100 mg/dL or within 15 mg/dL of BG values for BG values <100 mg/dL, 53% within 20%/20 mg/dL, and 72% within 30%/30 mg/dL. For the two sensors worn simultaneously, the mean absolute difference was 24 mg/dL (median 19 mg/dL) and the mean RAD was 14% (median 11%). In the non-ICU setting (<i>N</i> = 60; 1318 sensor-BG pairs), the mean difference was 24 mg/dL (median 21 mg/dL) and the mean RAD was 21% (median 17%). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Accuracy of the Dexcom G6 Pro sensor in the ICU setting was worse than has previously been reported for this sensor, with sensor values tending to be biased high. However, this appears to be a function of the G6 Pro sensor and not the setting as similar results were obtained in a non-ICU setting. Results should not be generalized to the real-time G6 or other sensors.</p>","PeriodicalId":11159,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of Dexcom G6 Pro Continuous Glucose Monitor in the Intensive Care Setting: TIGHT ICU G6 Study.\",\"authors\":\"Jagdeesh Ullal, Charles Spanbauer, Jesica D Baran, Rajlaxmi Bais, Hou-Hsien Chiang, Jing H Chao, Dori Khakpour, Patrisia Panfil, Francisco J Pasquel, Nikola Gligorijevic, Morgan S Jones, Cecilia C Low Wang, John B Buse, Boris Draznin, Judy Sibayan, Craig Kollman, Roy W Beck, Irl B Hirsch\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15209156251368933\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> To evaluate the accuracy of the Dexcom G6 Pro continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We performed a prospective, observational, multicenter study in adult ICU patients with a known diagnosis of diabetes or stress hyperglycemia who were being treated with insulin. Two Dexcom G6 Pro sensors were placed. Sensor accuracy was assessed by pairing sensor and blood glucose (BG) measurements obtained as a part of usual ICU care. Accuracy of the G6 Pro also was assessed concurrently in non-ICU hospitalized individuals. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 130 participants were enrolled, with mean (±SD) age of 62 ± 12 years, and preexisting diabetes was present in 73% and stress hyperglycemia in 27%. A total of 9120 sensor-BG pairs were analyzed. The mean relative absolute difference (RAD) was 23% (median 19%), with a mean difference of +25 mg/dL (median 25 mg/dL). Forty-one percent of sensor glucose values were within 15% of BG values for BG values ≥100 mg/dL or within 15 mg/dL of BG values for BG values <100 mg/dL, 53% within 20%/20 mg/dL, and 72% within 30%/30 mg/dL. For the two sensors worn simultaneously, the mean absolute difference was 24 mg/dL (median 19 mg/dL) and the mean RAD was 14% (median 11%). In the non-ICU setting (<i>N</i> = 60; 1318 sensor-BG pairs), the mean difference was 24 mg/dL (median 21 mg/dL) and the mean RAD was 21% (median 17%). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Accuracy of the Dexcom G6 Pro sensor in the ICU setting was worse than has previously been reported for this sensor, with sensor values tending to be biased high. However, this appears to be a function of the G6 Pro sensor and not the setting as similar results were obtained in a non-ICU setting. Results should not be generalized to the real-time G6 or other sensors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes technology & therapeutics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes technology & therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15209156251368933\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15209156251368933","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价Dexcom G6 Pro血糖连续监测(CGM)系统在重症监护病房(ICU)的准确性。方法:我们对已知诊断为糖尿病或应激性高血糖的ICU成人患者进行了一项前瞻性、观察性、多中心研究。放置两个Dexcom G6 Pro传感器。传感器的准确性通过配对传感器和血糖(BG)测量作为常规ICU护理的一部分进行评估。G6 Pro在非icu住院患者中的准确性也被同时评估。结果:共纳入130名参与者,平均(±SD)年龄为62±12岁,73%存在既往糖尿病,27%存在应激性高血糖。总共分析了9120对传感器- bg对。平均相对绝对差(RAD)为23%(中位数为19%),平均差为+ 25mg /dL(中位数为25mg /dL)。当BG值≥100 mg/dL时,41%的传感器葡萄糖值与BG值的偏差在15%以内;当BG值N = 60时,传感器葡萄糖值与BG值的偏差在15 mg/dL以内;1318对传感器- bg),平均差值为24 mg/dL(中位数为21 mg/dL),平均RAD为21%(中位数为17%)。结论:Dexcom G6 Pro传感器在ICU环境下的准确性比之前报道的传感器差,传感器值倾向于高偏倚。然而,这似乎是G6 Pro传感器的功能,而不是设置,因为在非icu设置中获得了类似的结果。结果不应推广到实时G6或其他传感器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accuracy of Dexcom G6 Pro Continuous Glucose Monitor in the Intensive Care Setting: TIGHT ICU G6 Study.

Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of the Dexcom G6 Pro continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting. Methods: We performed a prospective, observational, multicenter study in adult ICU patients with a known diagnosis of diabetes or stress hyperglycemia who were being treated with insulin. Two Dexcom G6 Pro sensors were placed. Sensor accuracy was assessed by pairing sensor and blood glucose (BG) measurements obtained as a part of usual ICU care. Accuracy of the G6 Pro also was assessed concurrently in non-ICU hospitalized individuals. Results: A total of 130 participants were enrolled, with mean (±SD) age of 62 ± 12 years, and preexisting diabetes was present in 73% and stress hyperglycemia in 27%. A total of 9120 sensor-BG pairs were analyzed. The mean relative absolute difference (RAD) was 23% (median 19%), with a mean difference of +25 mg/dL (median 25 mg/dL). Forty-one percent of sensor glucose values were within 15% of BG values for BG values ≥100 mg/dL or within 15 mg/dL of BG values for BG values <100 mg/dL, 53% within 20%/20 mg/dL, and 72% within 30%/30 mg/dL. For the two sensors worn simultaneously, the mean absolute difference was 24 mg/dL (median 19 mg/dL) and the mean RAD was 14% (median 11%). In the non-ICU setting (N = 60; 1318 sensor-BG pairs), the mean difference was 24 mg/dL (median 21 mg/dL) and the mean RAD was 21% (median 17%). Conclusions: Accuracy of the Dexcom G6 Pro sensor in the ICU setting was worse than has previously been reported for this sensor, with sensor values tending to be biased high. However, this appears to be a function of the G6 Pro sensor and not the setting as similar results were obtained in a non-ICU setting. Results should not be generalized to the real-time G6 or other sensors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes technology & therapeutics
Diabetes technology & therapeutics 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
14.80%
发文量
145
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics is the only peer-reviewed journal providing healthcare professionals with information on new devices, drugs, drug delivery systems, and software for managing patients with diabetes. This leading international journal delivers practical information and comprehensive coverage of cutting-edge technologies and therapeutics in the field, and each issue highlights new pharmacological and device developments to optimize patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信