英国生物库中估计的小密度LDL胆固醇和动脉粥样硬化性心血管风险。

IF 7.4 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Rafael Zubiran, Maureen Sampson, Anna Wolska, Alan T Remaley
{"title":"英国生物库中估计的小密度LDL胆固醇和动脉粥样硬化性心血管风险。","authors":"Rafael Zubiran, Maureen Sampson, Anna Wolska, Alan T Remaley","doi":"10.1161/ATVBAHA.125.323157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A key step in primary prevention is the assessment of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk. Risk enhancer tests are additional tools used to further improve ASCVD risk assessment over conventional risk markers. Our objective was to determine whether estimated small, dense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (E-sdLDL-C) can improve risk assessment and serve as a new risk enhancer test.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a prospective cohort analysis of participants in the UK Biobank study with a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 10 (6.7-12.3) years. We included 271 760 individuals who were not on lipid-lowering medication at baseline and did not have incident ASCVD. The primary study outcome was the incidence of all-cause ASCVD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>E-sdLDL-C was strongly associated with ASCVD events with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.23 (95% CI, 1.22-1.24). After multivariable adjustment for age, sex, systolic blood pressure, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and blood pressure medications, E-sdLDL-C and ApoB (apolipoprotein B) remained the most significant lipid risk factors (HR, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.16-1.19] and 1.17 [95% CI, 1.16-1.18] per SD, respectively). After further adjustment for ApoB, the association between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) with all-cause ASCVD was completely reversed with an HR of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.81-0.86), but E-sdLDL-C continued to have a significant positive association with an HR of 1.11 (95% CI, 1.08-1.13). When E-sdLDL-C was discordantly higher than either LDL-C or ApoB, the risk for ASCVD was higher (LDL-C, 31% higher; ApoB, 17% higher). When elevated E-sdLDL-C is coupled with other risk enhancer tests, there is a greater risk for developing ASCVD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a UK Biobank cohort for primary prevention, the risk of all-cause ASCVD was better captured by E-sdLDL-C than LDL-C. It was also more predictive than LDL-C and ApoB when discordant with these 2 measures. E-sdLDL-C, which can be freely and automatically calculated from a standard lipid panel, can potentially improve ASCVD risk assessment without additional laboratory testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":8401,"journal":{"name":"Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology","volume":" ","pages":"e512-e522"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12369564/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimated Small, Dense LDL Cholesterol and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk in the UK Biobank.\",\"authors\":\"Rafael Zubiran, Maureen Sampson, Anna Wolska, Alan T Remaley\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/ATVBAHA.125.323157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A key step in primary prevention is the assessment of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk. Risk enhancer tests are additional tools used to further improve ASCVD risk assessment over conventional risk markers. Our objective was to determine whether estimated small, dense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (E-sdLDL-C) can improve risk assessment and serve as a new risk enhancer test.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a prospective cohort analysis of participants in the UK Biobank study with a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 10 (6.7-12.3) years. We included 271 760 individuals who were not on lipid-lowering medication at baseline and did not have incident ASCVD. The primary study outcome was the incidence of all-cause ASCVD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>E-sdLDL-C was strongly associated with ASCVD events with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.23 (95% CI, 1.22-1.24). After multivariable adjustment for age, sex, systolic blood pressure, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and blood pressure medications, E-sdLDL-C and ApoB (apolipoprotein B) remained the most significant lipid risk factors (HR, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.16-1.19] and 1.17 [95% CI, 1.16-1.18] per SD, respectively). After further adjustment for ApoB, the association between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) with all-cause ASCVD was completely reversed with an HR of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.81-0.86), but E-sdLDL-C continued to have a significant positive association with an HR of 1.11 (95% CI, 1.08-1.13). When E-sdLDL-C was discordantly higher than either LDL-C or ApoB, the risk for ASCVD was higher (LDL-C, 31% higher; ApoB, 17% higher). When elevated E-sdLDL-C is coupled with other risk enhancer tests, there is a greater risk for developing ASCVD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a UK Biobank cohort for primary prevention, the risk of all-cause ASCVD was better captured by E-sdLDL-C than LDL-C. It was also more predictive than LDL-C and ApoB when discordant with these 2 measures. E-sdLDL-C, which can be freely and automatically calculated from a standard lipid panel, can potentially improve ASCVD risk assessment without additional laboratory testing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e512-e522\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12369564/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.125.323157\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.125.323157","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:一级预防的关键步骤是评估动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)的风险。风险增强测试是用于进一步改进ASCVD风险评估的额外工具,而不是传统的风险标记。我们的目的是确定估计的小密度低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(E-sdLDL-C)是否可以改善风险评估并作为一种新的风险增强试验。方法:我们对英国生物银行研究的参与者进行前瞻性队列分析,中位(四分位数范围)随访10年(6.7-12.3)年。我们纳入了271 760名基线时未服用降脂药物且未发生ASCVD的个体。主要研究结果是全因ASCVD的发生率。结果:E-sdLDL-C与ASCVD事件密切相关,风险比(HR)为1.23 (95% CI, 1.22-1.24)。在对年龄、性别、收缩压、高血压、2型糖尿病和降压药物进行多变量调整后,E-sdLDL-C和ApoB(载脂蛋白B)仍然是最重要的脂质危险因素(HR,分别为1.18 [95% CI, 1.16-1.19]和1.17 [95% CI, 1.16-1.18] / SD)。在进一步调整ApoB后,低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)与全因ASCVD之间的相关性完全逆转,风险比为0.84 (95% CI, 0.81-0.86),但E-sdLDL-C仍然具有显著的正相关性,风险比为1.11 (95% CI, 1.08-1.13)。当E-sdLDL-C不一致地高于LDL-C或ApoB时,ASCVD的风险更高(LDL-C高31%;ApoB,高出17%)。当E-sdLDL-C升高同时伴有其他风险增强试验时,发生ASCVD的风险更大。结论:在英国生物银行一级预防队列中,E-sdLDL-C比LDL-C更能捕获全因ASCVD的风险。当与LDL-C和ApoB不一致时,其预测能力也比LDL-C和ApoB更强。E-sdLDL-C可以自由和自动地从标准脂质面板中计算出来,可以潜在地改善ASCVD风险评估,而无需额外的实验室测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Estimated Small, Dense LDL Cholesterol and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk in the UK Biobank.

Background: A key step in primary prevention is the assessment of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk. Risk enhancer tests are additional tools used to further improve ASCVD risk assessment over conventional risk markers. Our objective was to determine whether estimated small, dense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (E-sdLDL-C) can improve risk assessment and serve as a new risk enhancer test.

Methods: We used a prospective cohort analysis of participants in the UK Biobank study with a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 10 (6.7-12.3) years. We included 271 760 individuals who were not on lipid-lowering medication at baseline and did not have incident ASCVD. The primary study outcome was the incidence of all-cause ASCVD.

Results: E-sdLDL-C was strongly associated with ASCVD events with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.23 (95% CI, 1.22-1.24). After multivariable adjustment for age, sex, systolic blood pressure, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and blood pressure medications, E-sdLDL-C and ApoB (apolipoprotein B) remained the most significant lipid risk factors (HR, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.16-1.19] and 1.17 [95% CI, 1.16-1.18] per SD, respectively). After further adjustment for ApoB, the association between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) with all-cause ASCVD was completely reversed with an HR of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.81-0.86), but E-sdLDL-C continued to have a significant positive association with an HR of 1.11 (95% CI, 1.08-1.13). When E-sdLDL-C was discordantly higher than either LDL-C or ApoB, the risk for ASCVD was higher (LDL-C, 31% higher; ApoB, 17% higher). When elevated E-sdLDL-C is coupled with other risk enhancer tests, there is a greater risk for developing ASCVD.

Conclusions: In a UK Biobank cohort for primary prevention, the risk of all-cause ASCVD was better captured by E-sdLDL-C than LDL-C. It was also more predictive than LDL-C and ApoB when discordant with these 2 measures. E-sdLDL-C, which can be freely and automatically calculated from a standard lipid panel, can potentially improve ASCVD risk assessment without additional laboratory testing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
337
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal "Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology" (ATVB) is a scientific publication that focuses on the fields of vascular biology, atherosclerosis, and thrombosis. It is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original research articles, reviews, and other scholarly content related to these areas. The journal is published by the American Heart Association (AHA) and the American Stroke Association (ASA). The journal was published bi-monthly until January 1992, after which it transitioned to a monthly publication schedule. The journal is aimed at a professional audience, including academic cardiologists, vascular biologists, physiologists, pharmacologists and hematologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信