Tianhao Zhang , Yujie Wang , Binlong Li, Rui Zhang, Wenxuan Liu, Bin Wei, Mao Xu
{"title":"一种反映颈前结构相对空间位置的新型综合指标模型,用于预测颈椎病患者喉镜检查困难","authors":"Tianhao Zhang , Yujie Wang , Binlong Li, Rui Zhang, Wenxuan Liu, Bin Wei, Mao Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.111966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Accurate assessment of difficult airway (DA) is critical, as failure to identify DA may lead to life-threatening complications. This study aimed to develop a multiparameter predictive model for DA using a novel ultrasound reference line (XU-line).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this prospective, observational, single-blinded study, patients scheduled for elective cervical spondylosis surgery at Peking University Third Hospital underwent preoperative airway evaluation via physical indices and ultrasonography. Distances from the XU-line to six anatomical landmarks (hyoid bone, cricoid cartilage, epiglottis, vocal cords, thyroid isthmus, and suprasternal notch) were measured both in supine and sniffing positions. Participants were stratified into “easy laryngoscopy” and “difficult laryngoscopy” groups based on Cormack–Lehane (C-L) grades. Multivariate logistic regression identified independent predictors of difficult laryngoscopy.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were significant differences in the thirteen clinical factors between the two groups. Sex, modified Mallampati test, skin-to-epiglottis distance (neutral position), XU-line-to-vocal-cords distance (sniffing position), and spatial distances from XU-line to cricoid cartilage were found to be independent risk factors for difficult laryngoscopy. A combined model incorporating these five factors demonstrated superior predictive performance (sensitivity: 82.0 %; specificity: 61 %) compared to individual clinical predictors or traditional clinical models.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The spatial relationship between cervical airway structures and the XU-line may serve as a novel predictive index in a comprehensive DA assessment model.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 111966"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A novel comprehensive model of indicators reflecting the relative spatial position of the anterior cervical structures for predicting difficult laryngoscopy in patients with cervical spondylosis\",\"authors\":\"Tianhao Zhang , Yujie Wang , Binlong Li, Rui Zhang, Wenxuan Liu, Bin Wei, Mao Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.111966\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Accurate assessment of difficult airway (DA) is critical, as failure to identify DA may lead to life-threatening complications. This study aimed to develop a multiparameter predictive model for DA using a novel ultrasound reference line (XU-line).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this prospective, observational, single-blinded study, patients scheduled for elective cervical spondylosis surgery at Peking University Third Hospital underwent preoperative airway evaluation via physical indices and ultrasonography. Distances from the XU-line to six anatomical landmarks (hyoid bone, cricoid cartilage, epiglottis, vocal cords, thyroid isthmus, and suprasternal notch) were measured both in supine and sniffing positions. Participants were stratified into “easy laryngoscopy” and “difficult laryngoscopy” groups based on Cormack–Lehane (C-L) grades. Multivariate logistic regression identified independent predictors of difficult laryngoscopy.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were significant differences in the thirteen clinical factors between the two groups. Sex, modified Mallampati test, skin-to-epiglottis distance (neutral position), XU-line-to-vocal-cords distance (sniffing position), and spatial distances from XU-line to cricoid cartilage were found to be independent risk factors for difficult laryngoscopy. A combined model incorporating these five factors demonstrated superior predictive performance (sensitivity: 82.0 %; specificity: 61 %) compared to individual clinical predictors or traditional clinical models.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The spatial relationship between cervical airway structures and the XU-line may serve as a novel predictive index in a comprehensive DA assessment model.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia\",\"volume\":\"106 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111966\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818025002272\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818025002272","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A novel comprehensive model of indicators reflecting the relative spatial position of the anterior cervical structures for predicting difficult laryngoscopy in patients with cervical spondylosis
Background
Accurate assessment of difficult airway (DA) is critical, as failure to identify DA may lead to life-threatening complications. This study aimed to develop a multiparameter predictive model for DA using a novel ultrasound reference line (XU-line).
Methods
In this prospective, observational, single-blinded study, patients scheduled for elective cervical spondylosis surgery at Peking University Third Hospital underwent preoperative airway evaluation via physical indices and ultrasonography. Distances from the XU-line to six anatomical landmarks (hyoid bone, cricoid cartilage, epiglottis, vocal cords, thyroid isthmus, and suprasternal notch) were measured both in supine and sniffing positions. Participants were stratified into “easy laryngoscopy” and “difficult laryngoscopy” groups based on Cormack–Lehane (C-L) grades. Multivariate logistic regression identified independent predictors of difficult laryngoscopy.
Results
There were significant differences in the thirteen clinical factors between the two groups. Sex, modified Mallampati test, skin-to-epiglottis distance (neutral position), XU-line-to-vocal-cords distance (sniffing position), and spatial distances from XU-line to cricoid cartilage were found to be independent risk factors for difficult laryngoscopy. A combined model incorporating these five factors demonstrated superior predictive performance (sensitivity: 82.0 %; specificity: 61 %) compared to individual clinical predictors or traditional clinical models.
Conclusion
The spatial relationship between cervical airway structures and the XU-line may serve as a novel predictive index in a comprehensive DA assessment model.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Anesthesia (JCA) addresses all aspects of anesthesia practice, including anesthetic administration, pharmacokinetics, preoperative and postoperative considerations, coexisting disease and other complicating factors, cost issues, and similar concerns anesthesiologists contend with daily. Exceptionally high standards of presentation and accuracy are maintained.
The core of the journal is original contributions on subjects relevant to clinical practice, and rigorously peer-reviewed. Highly respected international experts have joined together to form the Editorial Board, sharing their years of experience and clinical expertise. Specialized section editors cover the various subspecialties within the field. To keep your practical clinical skills current, the journal bridges the gap between the laboratory and the clinical practice of anesthesiology and critical care to clarify how new insights can improve daily practice.