Xiguang Fu , Mengyuan Yuan , Yong Zhang , Haoyu Zhu , Shengjun Sun , Chuhan Jiang
{"title":"预测症状性慢性颈动脉闭塞血管内再通成功:基于321例病例的决策树模型","authors":"Xiguang Fu , Mengyuan Yuan , Yong Zhang , Haoyu Zhu , Shengjun Sun , Chuhan Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.clineuro.2025.109108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Endovascular recanalization for chronic internal carotid artery occlusion (CICAO) remains technically challenging, with variable success rates and a lack of reliable predictive tools for patient selection. We aim to analyze risk factors associated with failed recanalization in CICAO patients and develop a decision tree model to quantify individualized recanalization potential.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively analyzed 321 patients with symptomatic CICAO who underwent endovascular recanalization. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify risk factors for recanalization failure. A decision tree model and logistic model were constructed. Models’ performance was evaluated using AUC analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The overall recanalization success rate was 61.7 %. Our study identified three independent risk factors for failed recanalization: occlusion length > 10 cm, type III stump morphology, and contralateral internal carotid artery stenosis. The decision-tree model demonstrated good performance (AUC 0.839 in training, 0.834 in validation) and provided clinical interpretability compared to logistic regression. DCA confirmed clinical utility across probability thresholds.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We developed and validated a decision tree model that effectively predicts endovascular recanalization success in CICAO patients, which may serve as a valuable tool to support clinical decision-making for patients with CICAO.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10385,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","volume":"257 ","pages":"Article 109108"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting endovascular recanalization success in symptomatic chronic carotid occlusion: A decision tree model based on 321 cases\",\"authors\":\"Xiguang Fu , Mengyuan Yuan , Yong Zhang , Haoyu Zhu , Shengjun Sun , Chuhan Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clineuro.2025.109108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Endovascular recanalization for chronic internal carotid artery occlusion (CICAO) remains technically challenging, with variable success rates and a lack of reliable predictive tools for patient selection. We aim to analyze risk factors associated with failed recanalization in CICAO patients and develop a decision tree model to quantify individualized recanalization potential.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively analyzed 321 patients with symptomatic CICAO who underwent endovascular recanalization. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify risk factors for recanalization failure. A decision tree model and logistic model were constructed. Models’ performance was evaluated using AUC analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The overall recanalization success rate was 61.7 %. Our study identified three independent risk factors for failed recanalization: occlusion length > 10 cm, type III stump morphology, and contralateral internal carotid artery stenosis. The decision-tree model demonstrated good performance (AUC 0.839 in training, 0.834 in validation) and provided clinical interpretability compared to logistic regression. DCA confirmed clinical utility across probability thresholds.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We developed and validated a decision tree model that effectively predicts endovascular recanalization success in CICAO patients, which may serve as a valuable tool to support clinical decision-making for patients with CICAO.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\"257 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109108\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303846725003919\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303846725003919","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Predicting endovascular recanalization success in symptomatic chronic carotid occlusion: A decision tree model based on 321 cases
Background
Endovascular recanalization for chronic internal carotid artery occlusion (CICAO) remains technically challenging, with variable success rates and a lack of reliable predictive tools for patient selection. We aim to analyze risk factors associated with failed recanalization in CICAO patients and develop a decision tree model to quantify individualized recanalization potential.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed 321 patients with symptomatic CICAO who underwent endovascular recanalization. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify risk factors for recanalization failure. A decision tree model and logistic model were constructed. Models’ performance was evaluated using AUC analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA).
Results
The overall recanalization success rate was 61.7 %. Our study identified three independent risk factors for failed recanalization: occlusion length > 10 cm, type III stump morphology, and contralateral internal carotid artery stenosis. The decision-tree model demonstrated good performance (AUC 0.839 in training, 0.834 in validation) and provided clinical interpretability compared to logistic regression. DCA confirmed clinical utility across probability thresholds.
Conclusions
We developed and validated a decision tree model that effectively predicts endovascular recanalization success in CICAO patients, which may serve as a valuable tool to support clinical decision-making for patients with CICAO.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery is devoted to publishing papers and reports on the clinical aspects of neurology and neurosurgery. It is an international forum for papers of high scientific standard that are of interest to Neurologists and Neurosurgeons world-wide.