预测症状性慢性颈动脉闭塞血管内再通成功:基于321例病例的决策树模型

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Xiguang Fu , Mengyuan Yuan , Yong Zhang , Haoyu Zhu , Shengjun Sun , Chuhan Jiang
{"title":"预测症状性慢性颈动脉闭塞血管内再通成功:基于321例病例的决策树模型","authors":"Xiguang Fu ,&nbsp;Mengyuan Yuan ,&nbsp;Yong Zhang ,&nbsp;Haoyu Zhu ,&nbsp;Shengjun Sun ,&nbsp;Chuhan Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.clineuro.2025.109108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Endovascular recanalization for chronic internal carotid artery occlusion (CICAO) remains technically challenging, with variable success rates and a lack of reliable predictive tools for patient selection. We aim to analyze risk factors associated with failed recanalization in CICAO patients and develop a decision tree model to quantify individualized recanalization potential.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively analyzed 321 patients with symptomatic CICAO who underwent endovascular recanalization. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify risk factors for recanalization failure. A decision tree model and logistic model were constructed. Models’ performance was evaluated using AUC analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The overall recanalization success rate was 61.7 %. Our study identified three independent risk factors for failed recanalization: occlusion length &gt; 10 cm, type III stump morphology, and contralateral internal carotid artery stenosis. The decision-tree model demonstrated good performance (AUC 0.839 in training, 0.834 in validation) and provided clinical interpretability compared to logistic regression. DCA confirmed clinical utility across probability thresholds.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We developed and validated a decision tree model that effectively predicts endovascular recanalization success in CICAO patients, which may serve as a valuable tool to support clinical decision-making for patients with CICAO.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10385,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","volume":"257 ","pages":"Article 109108"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting endovascular recanalization success in symptomatic chronic carotid occlusion: A decision tree model based on 321 cases\",\"authors\":\"Xiguang Fu ,&nbsp;Mengyuan Yuan ,&nbsp;Yong Zhang ,&nbsp;Haoyu Zhu ,&nbsp;Shengjun Sun ,&nbsp;Chuhan Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clineuro.2025.109108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Endovascular recanalization for chronic internal carotid artery occlusion (CICAO) remains technically challenging, with variable success rates and a lack of reliable predictive tools for patient selection. We aim to analyze risk factors associated with failed recanalization in CICAO patients and develop a decision tree model to quantify individualized recanalization potential.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively analyzed 321 patients with symptomatic CICAO who underwent endovascular recanalization. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify risk factors for recanalization failure. A decision tree model and logistic model were constructed. Models’ performance was evaluated using AUC analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The overall recanalization success rate was 61.7 %. Our study identified three independent risk factors for failed recanalization: occlusion length &gt; 10 cm, type III stump morphology, and contralateral internal carotid artery stenosis. The decision-tree model demonstrated good performance (AUC 0.839 in training, 0.834 in validation) and provided clinical interpretability compared to logistic regression. DCA confirmed clinical utility across probability thresholds.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We developed and validated a decision tree model that effectively predicts endovascular recanalization success in CICAO patients, which may serve as a valuable tool to support clinical decision-making for patients with CICAO.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\"257 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109108\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303846725003919\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303846725003919","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:慢性颈内动脉闭塞(CICAO)的血管再通术在技术上仍然具有挑战性,成功率不一,并且缺乏可靠的预测工具来选择患者。我们的目的是分析与CICAO患者再通失败相关的危险因素,并建立决策树模型来量化个体化再通潜力。方法回顾性分析321例有症状的CICAO患者行血管内再通术。单因素和多因素分析用于确定再通失败的危险因素。建立了决策树模型和逻辑模型。采用AUC分析和决策曲线分析(DCA)对模型的性能进行评价。结果总再通成功率为61.7 %。我们的研究确定了再通失败的三个独立危险因素:闭塞长度>; 10 cm, III型残端形态和对侧颈内动脉狭窄。与逻辑回归相比,决策树模型表现出良好的性能(训练时AUC为0.839,验证时AUC为0.834),并具有临床可解释性。DCA证实了跨概率阈值的临床效用。结论建立并验证了一种预测CICAO患者血管内再通成功的决策树模型,该模型可作为支持CICAO患者临床决策的有价值工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting endovascular recanalization success in symptomatic chronic carotid occlusion: A decision tree model based on 321 cases

Background

Endovascular recanalization for chronic internal carotid artery occlusion (CICAO) remains technically challenging, with variable success rates and a lack of reliable predictive tools for patient selection. We aim to analyze risk factors associated with failed recanalization in CICAO patients and develop a decision tree model to quantify individualized recanalization potential.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 321 patients with symptomatic CICAO who underwent endovascular recanalization. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify risk factors for recanalization failure. A decision tree model and logistic model were constructed. Models’ performance was evaluated using AUC analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

The overall recanalization success rate was 61.7 %. Our study identified three independent risk factors for failed recanalization: occlusion length > 10 cm, type III stump morphology, and contralateral internal carotid artery stenosis. The decision-tree model demonstrated good performance (AUC 0.839 in training, 0.834 in validation) and provided clinical interpretability compared to logistic regression. DCA confirmed clinical utility across probability thresholds.

Conclusions

We developed and validated a decision tree model that effectively predicts endovascular recanalization success in CICAO patients, which may serve as a valuable tool to support clinical decision-making for patients with CICAO.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
358
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery is devoted to publishing papers and reports on the clinical aspects of neurology and neurosurgery. It is an international forum for papers of high scientific standard that are of interest to Neurologists and Neurosurgeons world-wide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信