Do disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs affect implant-based breast reconstruction outcomes in patients with autoimmune connective tissue disease?

Background

As breast implants gain popularity, there remains concern over implant safety. Roughly 8% of the U.S population lives with an autoimmune disease, yet there is a paucity of literature comparing outcomes between patients taking disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and those not taking DMARDs undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction.

Methods

The TrinetX database identified 2 cohorts of 1262 patients each: those with an autoimmune connective tissue disease on a DMARD, and subsequently underwent implant-based breast reconstruction, and those with similar diagnoses undergoing the same procedure, without prior exposure to DMARDs. Demographics and comorbidities were matched via a 1:1 propensity-score analysis to identify predictors of postoperative outcomes within 90-days and 2-years.

Results

Within 90 days, DMARD patients had higher odds of necrosis (OR 1.86, P = 0.03) and surgical site pain (OR 1.43, P = 0.01). Within 2 years, DMARD patients had higher odds of postoperative infection (OR 1.35, P = 0.04), DVT (OR 1.76, P = 0.01), PE (OR 2.52, P = 0.001), emergency room (ER) visit (OR 1.21, P = 0.03), surgical site pain (OR 1.46, P = 0.001), and capsulectomy (OR 1.30, P = 0.04). Patients on conventional DMARDs were found to have increased odds of capsular contracture within 2 years compared to patients on biologic DMARDs (OR 3.29, P = 0.001).

Conclusion

Patients on DMARDs were more likely to experience negative postoperative outcomes within 90 days and 2 years, with increased capsular contracture risk in those taking conventional DMARDs. Plastic surgeons should be cognizant of these postoperative complications to improve patient outcomes.