监管、实施和评估新加坡医疗保健中的人工智能:人工智能治理圆桌会议的观点。

IF 2 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Wilson Wen Bin Goh, Cher Heng Tan, Clive Tan, Andrew Prahl, May O Lwin, Joseph Sung
{"title":"监管、实施和评估新加坡医疗保健中的人工智能:人工智能治理圆桌会议的观点。","authors":"Wilson Wen Bin Goh, Cher Heng Tan, Clive Tan, Andrew Prahl, May O Lwin, Joseph Sung","doi":"10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.202556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>An interdisciplinary panel, comprising professionals from medicine, AI and data science, law and ethics, and patient advocacy, convened to discuss key principles on regulation, implementation and evaluation of AI models in healthcare for Singapore.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The panel considered 14 statements split across 4 themes: \"The Role and Scope of Regulatory Entities,\" \"Regulatory Processes,\" \"Pre-Approval Evaluation of AI Models\" and \"Medical AI in Practice\". Moderated by a thematic representative, the panel deliberated on each statement and modified it until a majority agreement threshold is met. The roundtable meeting was convened in Singapore on 1 July 2024. While the statements reflect local perspectives, they may serve as a reference for other countries navigating similar challenges in AI governance in healthcare.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Balanced testing approaches, differentiated regulatory standards for autonomous and assistive AI, and context-sensitive requirements are essential in regulating AI models in healthcare. A hybrid approach-integrating global standards with local needs to ensure AI comple-ments human decision-making and enhances clinical expertise-was recommended. Additionally, the need for patient involvement at multiple levels was underscored. There are active ongoing efforts towards development and refinement of AI governance guidelines and frameworks balancing between regulation and freedom. The statements defined therein provide guidance on how prevailing values and viewpoints can streamline AI implementation into healthcare.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This roundtable discussion is among the first in Singapore to develop a structured set of state-ments tailored for the regulation, implementation and evaluation of AI models in healthcare, drawing on interdisciplinary expertise from medicine, AI, data science, law, ethics and patient advocacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":502093,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore","volume":"54 7","pages":"428-436"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regulating, implementing and evaluating AI in Singapore healthcare: AI governance roundtable's view.\",\"authors\":\"Wilson Wen Bin Goh, Cher Heng Tan, Clive Tan, Andrew Prahl, May O Lwin, Joseph Sung\",\"doi\":\"10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.202556\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>An interdisciplinary panel, comprising professionals from medicine, AI and data science, law and ethics, and patient advocacy, convened to discuss key principles on regulation, implementation and evaluation of AI models in healthcare for Singapore.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The panel considered 14 statements split across 4 themes: \\\"The Role and Scope of Regulatory Entities,\\\" \\\"Regulatory Processes,\\\" \\\"Pre-Approval Evaluation of AI Models\\\" and \\\"Medical AI in Practice\\\". Moderated by a thematic representative, the panel deliberated on each statement and modified it until a majority agreement threshold is met. The roundtable meeting was convened in Singapore on 1 July 2024. While the statements reflect local perspectives, they may serve as a reference for other countries navigating similar challenges in AI governance in healthcare.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Balanced testing approaches, differentiated regulatory standards for autonomous and assistive AI, and context-sensitive requirements are essential in regulating AI models in healthcare. A hybrid approach-integrating global standards with local needs to ensure AI comple-ments human decision-making and enhances clinical expertise-was recommended. Additionally, the need for patient involvement at multiple levels was underscored. There are active ongoing efforts towards development and refinement of AI governance guidelines and frameworks balancing between regulation and freedom. The statements defined therein provide guidance on how prevailing values and viewpoints can streamline AI implementation into healthcare.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This roundtable discussion is among the first in Singapore to develop a structured set of state-ments tailored for the regulation, implementation and evaluation of AI models in healthcare, drawing on interdisciplinary expertise from medicine, AI, data science, law, ethics and patient advocacy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":502093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore\",\"volume\":\"54 7\",\"pages\":\"428-436\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.202556\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.202556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导论:由医学、人工智能和数据科学、法律和伦理以及患者倡导等专业人士组成的跨学科小组召开会议,讨论新加坡医疗保健中人工智能模型的监管、实施和评估的关键原则。方法:专家组审议了14项声明,分为4个主题:“监管实体的作用和范围”、“监管程序”、“人工智能模型的预批准评估”和“医疗人工智能实践”。在一名专题代表的主持下,小组审议每一项声明,并对其进行修改,直到达到多数同意的门槛。圆桌会议于2024年7月1日在新加坡召开。虽然这些声明反映了当地的观点,但它们可以作为其他国家应对医疗保健领域人工智能治理方面类似挑战的参考。结果:平衡的测试方法、自主和辅助人工智能的差异化监管标准以及上下文敏感要求对于监管医疗保健中的人工智能模型至关重要。建议采用一种混合方法,即将全球标准与当地需求相结合,以确保人工智能补充人类决策并增强临床专业知识。此外,还强调了患者多层次参与的必要性。正在积极努力发展和完善人工智能治理准则和框架,在监管和自由之间取得平衡。其中定义的陈述提供了指导,说明流行的价值观和观点如何能够简化人工智能在医疗保健领域的实施。结论:本次圆桌讨论是新加坡首批针对医疗保健领域人工智能模型的监管、实施和评估制定一套结构化声明的圆桌讨论之一,借鉴了医学、人工智能、数据科学、法律、伦理和患者倡导的跨学科专业知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Regulating, implementing and evaluating AI in Singapore healthcare: AI governance roundtable's view.

Introduction: An interdisciplinary panel, comprising professionals from medicine, AI and data science, law and ethics, and patient advocacy, convened to discuss key principles on regulation, implementation and evaluation of AI models in healthcare for Singapore.

Method: The panel considered 14 statements split across 4 themes: "The Role and Scope of Regulatory Entities," "Regulatory Processes," "Pre-Approval Evaluation of AI Models" and "Medical AI in Practice". Moderated by a thematic representative, the panel deliberated on each statement and modified it until a majority agreement threshold is met. The roundtable meeting was convened in Singapore on 1 July 2024. While the statements reflect local perspectives, they may serve as a reference for other countries navigating similar challenges in AI governance in healthcare.

Results: Balanced testing approaches, differentiated regulatory standards for autonomous and assistive AI, and context-sensitive requirements are essential in regulating AI models in healthcare. A hybrid approach-integrating global standards with local needs to ensure AI comple-ments human decision-making and enhances clinical expertise-was recommended. Additionally, the need for patient involvement at multiple levels was underscored. There are active ongoing efforts towards development and refinement of AI governance guidelines and frameworks balancing between regulation and freedom. The statements defined therein provide guidance on how prevailing values and viewpoints can streamline AI implementation into healthcare.

Conclusion: This roundtable discussion is among the first in Singapore to develop a structured set of state-ments tailored for the regulation, implementation and evaluation of AI models in healthcare, drawing on interdisciplinary expertise from medicine, AI, data science, law, ethics and patient advocacy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信