南非骨科注册的历史和未来。

Brian Bernstein, Odette Koch, Thomas Hilton
{"title":"南非骨科注册的历史和未来。","authors":"Brian Bernstein, Odette Koch, Thomas Hilton","doi":"10.1097/OI9.0000000000000381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Data is power. In 2017, the South African Orthopaedic Association (SAOA) presidential line identified a political and market-influenced initiative to collect and use data in the health care space. The South African government had funded a \"Health Market Inquiry\" (HMI), which determined that medical professionals were poorly monitored and lacked peer review. Clinicians were not involved in this effort and were not well positioned to represent the interests of patients. The report noted that funders and hospital groups favored patient-reported outcome measurements (PROs) but proposed to collect and interpret the data themselves. Clinical data was, therefore, being collected and interpreted by nonclinicians. It became evident that it was in the interest of the SAOA to control this data securely with orthopaedic peer interpretation of the data. At the time of the HMI report, 2 databases were in use in South Africa: a National Joint Registry had been created in 2012 (limited to arthroplasty) and the REDCap database had been adopted by many academic units and was used mainly for research. Other than these registries, medical data was individually stored and opaque. This report summarizes the efforts of the SAOA to collect meaningful PROs and provide clinically relevant data analysis to inform health care policy and clinical quality improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":74381,"journal":{"name":"OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma","volume":"8 4 Suppl","pages":"e381"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12337251/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Orthopaedic registry history and future in South Africa.\",\"authors\":\"Brian Bernstein, Odette Koch, Thomas Hilton\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/OI9.0000000000000381\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Data is power. In 2017, the South African Orthopaedic Association (SAOA) presidential line identified a political and market-influenced initiative to collect and use data in the health care space. The South African government had funded a \\\"Health Market Inquiry\\\" (HMI), which determined that medical professionals were poorly monitored and lacked peer review. Clinicians were not involved in this effort and were not well positioned to represent the interests of patients. The report noted that funders and hospital groups favored patient-reported outcome measurements (PROs) but proposed to collect and interpret the data themselves. Clinical data was, therefore, being collected and interpreted by nonclinicians. It became evident that it was in the interest of the SAOA to control this data securely with orthopaedic peer interpretation of the data. At the time of the HMI report, 2 databases were in use in South Africa: a National Joint Registry had been created in 2012 (limited to arthroplasty) and the REDCap database had been adopted by many academic units and was used mainly for research. Other than these registries, medical data was individually stored and opaque. This report summarizes the efforts of the SAOA to collect meaningful PROs and provide clinically relevant data analysis to inform health care policy and clinical quality improvement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma\",\"volume\":\"8 4 Suppl\",\"pages\":\"e381\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12337251/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000381\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数据就是力量。2017年,南非骨科协会(SAOA)主席确定了一项受政治和市场影响的倡议,旨在收集和使用医疗保健领域的数据。南非政府资助了一项“卫生市场调查”(HMI),该调查确定医疗专业人员受到的监督很差,缺乏同行评议。临床医生没有参与这项工作,也没有很好地代表患者的利益。该报告指出,资助者和医院团体倾向于患者报告的结果测量(PROs),但建议自己收集和解释数据。因此,临床数据由非临床医生收集和解释。很明显,SAOA有兴趣安全地控制这些数据,并对数据进行骨科同行解释。在HMI报告发布时,南非正在使用两个数据库:2012年创建了一个国家联合登记处(仅限于关节成形术),REDCap数据库已被许多学术单位采用,主要用于研究。除了这些注册中心之外,医疗数据是单独存储的,并且不透明。本报告总结了SAOA在收集有意义的pro和提供临床相关数据分析以告知医疗保健政策和临床质量改进方面所做的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Orthopaedic registry history and future in South Africa.

Data is power. In 2017, the South African Orthopaedic Association (SAOA) presidential line identified a political and market-influenced initiative to collect and use data in the health care space. The South African government had funded a "Health Market Inquiry" (HMI), which determined that medical professionals were poorly monitored and lacked peer review. Clinicians were not involved in this effort and were not well positioned to represent the interests of patients. The report noted that funders and hospital groups favored patient-reported outcome measurements (PROs) but proposed to collect and interpret the data themselves. Clinical data was, therefore, being collected and interpreted by nonclinicians. It became evident that it was in the interest of the SAOA to control this data securely with orthopaedic peer interpretation of the data. At the time of the HMI report, 2 databases were in use in South Africa: a National Joint Registry had been created in 2012 (limited to arthroplasty) and the REDCap database had been adopted by many academic units and was used mainly for research. Other than these registries, medical data was individually stored and opaque. This report summarizes the efforts of the SAOA to collect meaningful PROs and provide clinically relevant data analysis to inform health care policy and clinical quality improvement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信