在Biograph Vision Quadra PET-CT上的EARL依从性:静态和连续床运动采集的幻影研究。

IF 1.4
Beverley F Holman, Tamar Willson, Bruno Ferreira, Neil Davis, Hemangini Natarajan, Jannat Khan, Thomas Wagner, Daniel McCool
{"title":"在Biograph Vision Quadra PET-CT上的EARL依从性:静态和连续床运动采集的幻影研究。","authors":"Beverley F Holman, Tamar Willson, Bruno Ferreira, Neil Davis, Hemangini Natarajan, Jannat Khan, Thomas Wagner, Daniel McCool","doi":"10.3389/fnume.2025.1646628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Long axial field-of-view (LAFOV) PET systems like the Siemens Biograph Vision Quadra offer unprecedented sensitivity and imaging capabilities, but compliance with EARL standards across all acquisition modes remains unexplored. This study aimed to identify reconstruction parameters meeting EARL 1 and 2 compliance for static and continuous bed motion (CBM) acquisitions in High Sensitivity (HS) and Ultra-High Sensitivity (UHS) modes on the Quadra. The research focused on optimising image quality while maintaining compliance with quantitative standards.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) body phantom was filled with <sup>18</sup>F-FDG in a 10:1 sphere-to-background activity ratio and scanned at five positions across the field of view (FOV) using static and CBM acquisitions in HS and UHS modes. Reconstructions used standard clinical parameters, varied with Gaussian filters (1-7 mm) and matrix sizes (440, 220, 128). EARL compliance was assessed with the EARL tool to evaluate SUV recovery coefficients (RCSUVmean, RCSUVmax, RCSUVpeak). Patient images were reconstructed using standard and EARL-compliant parameters for comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Reconstruction parameters achieving EARL compliance were identified for all acquisition modes, with no differences between static and CBM reconstructions. Achieving EARL compliance required significant image quality reductions, especially for EARL 1, with greater degradation in UHS mode. Patient images reconstructed with EARL-compliant parameters appeared smoother and had reduced contrast compared to clinical reconstructions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While EARL compliance ensures quantitative standardisation, it significantly reduces image quality, especially on advanced LAFOV PET systems. An updated \"EARL 3\" standard is needed to reflect the capabilities of modern systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":73095,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in nuclear medicine (Lausanne, Switzerland)","volume":"5 ","pages":"1646628"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12339562/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EARL compliance on the Biograph Vision Quadra PET-CT: phantom study for static and continuous bed motion acquisitions.\",\"authors\":\"Beverley F Holman, Tamar Willson, Bruno Ferreira, Neil Davis, Hemangini Natarajan, Jannat Khan, Thomas Wagner, Daniel McCool\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fnume.2025.1646628\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Long axial field-of-view (LAFOV) PET systems like the Siemens Biograph Vision Quadra offer unprecedented sensitivity and imaging capabilities, but compliance with EARL standards across all acquisition modes remains unexplored. This study aimed to identify reconstruction parameters meeting EARL 1 and 2 compliance for static and continuous bed motion (CBM) acquisitions in High Sensitivity (HS) and Ultra-High Sensitivity (UHS) modes on the Quadra. The research focused on optimising image quality while maintaining compliance with quantitative standards.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) body phantom was filled with <sup>18</sup>F-FDG in a 10:1 sphere-to-background activity ratio and scanned at five positions across the field of view (FOV) using static and CBM acquisitions in HS and UHS modes. Reconstructions used standard clinical parameters, varied with Gaussian filters (1-7 mm) and matrix sizes (440, 220, 128). EARL compliance was assessed with the EARL tool to evaluate SUV recovery coefficients (RCSUVmean, RCSUVmax, RCSUVpeak). Patient images were reconstructed using standard and EARL-compliant parameters for comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Reconstruction parameters achieving EARL compliance were identified for all acquisition modes, with no differences between static and CBM reconstructions. Achieving EARL compliance required significant image quality reductions, especially for EARL 1, with greater degradation in UHS mode. Patient images reconstructed with EARL-compliant parameters appeared smoother and had reduced contrast compared to clinical reconstructions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While EARL compliance ensures quantitative standardisation, it significantly reduces image quality, especially on advanced LAFOV PET systems. An updated \\\"EARL 3\\\" standard is needed to reflect the capabilities of modern systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in nuclear medicine (Lausanne, Switzerland)\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"1646628\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12339562/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in nuclear medicine (Lausanne, Switzerland)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnume.2025.1646628\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in nuclear medicine (Lausanne, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnume.2025.1646628","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:像西门子Biograph Vision Quadra这样的长轴向视场(LAFOV) PET系统提供了前所未有的灵敏度和成像能力,但在所有采集模式下是否符合EARL标准仍有待探索。本研究旨在确定在Quadra上高灵敏度(HS)和超高灵敏度(UHS)模式下静态和连续床体运动(CBM)采集符合EARL 1和2的重建参数。研究的重点是优化图像质量,同时保持符合定量标准。方法:用18F-FDG填充国际Electrotechnical Commission (IEC)人体幻影,球体与背景活动比为10:1,在HS和UHS模式下使用静态和CBM采集在视场(FOV)的五个位置进行扫描。重建使用标准临床参数,随高斯滤波器(1-7 mm)和矩阵尺寸(440、220、128)而变化。采用EARL工具评估SUV恢复系数(RCSUVmean、RCSUVmax、RCSUVpeak),评估EARL依从性。使用标准和符合earl的参数重建患者图像进行比较。结果:在所有采集模式下,重建参数都达到了EARL顺应性,静态重建和CBM重建之间没有差异。实现EARL合规要求显著降低图像质量,尤其是EARL 1,在UHS模式下图像质量下降更大。与临床重建相比,符合earl参数重建的患者图像更平滑,对比度降低。结论:虽然EARL符合性确保了定量标准化,但它显著降低了图像质量,特别是在先进的LAFOV PET系统上。需要一个更新的“EARL 3”标准来反映现代系统的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EARL compliance on the Biograph Vision Quadra PET-CT: phantom study for static and continuous bed motion acquisitions.

Purpose: Long axial field-of-view (LAFOV) PET systems like the Siemens Biograph Vision Quadra offer unprecedented sensitivity and imaging capabilities, but compliance with EARL standards across all acquisition modes remains unexplored. This study aimed to identify reconstruction parameters meeting EARL 1 and 2 compliance for static and continuous bed motion (CBM) acquisitions in High Sensitivity (HS) and Ultra-High Sensitivity (UHS) modes on the Quadra. The research focused on optimising image quality while maintaining compliance with quantitative standards.

Methods: The International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) body phantom was filled with 18F-FDG in a 10:1 sphere-to-background activity ratio and scanned at five positions across the field of view (FOV) using static and CBM acquisitions in HS and UHS modes. Reconstructions used standard clinical parameters, varied with Gaussian filters (1-7 mm) and matrix sizes (440, 220, 128). EARL compliance was assessed with the EARL tool to evaluate SUV recovery coefficients (RCSUVmean, RCSUVmax, RCSUVpeak). Patient images were reconstructed using standard and EARL-compliant parameters for comparison.

Results: Reconstruction parameters achieving EARL compliance were identified for all acquisition modes, with no differences between static and CBM reconstructions. Achieving EARL compliance required significant image quality reductions, especially for EARL 1, with greater degradation in UHS mode. Patient images reconstructed with EARL-compliant parameters appeared smoother and had reduced contrast compared to clinical reconstructions.

Conclusion: While EARL compliance ensures quantitative standardisation, it significantly reduces image quality, especially on advanced LAFOV PET systems. An updated "EARL 3" standard is needed to reflect the capabilities of modern systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信