参与社区共同设计学习型卫生系统:来自讲故事和Design Jam的经验教训,这是加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省的一个社区案例研究。

IF 2.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Frontiers in health services Pub Date : 2025-07-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frhs.2025.1620659
Margaret Chen-Mei Lin, Krisztina Vasarhelyi, Karen Lok Yi Wong, Haruka Furuichi, Jim Mann, Annette Berndt, Kayoung Lee, Lori Benning, Lillian Hung
{"title":"参与社区共同设计学习型卫生系统:来自讲故事和Design Jam的经验教训,这是加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省的一个社区案例研究。","authors":"Margaret Chen-Mei Lin, Krisztina Vasarhelyi, Karen Lok Yi Wong, Haruka Furuichi, Jim Mann, Annette Berndt, Kayoung Lee, Lori Benning, Lillian Hung","doi":"10.3389/frhs.2025.1620659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health and research systems produce vast amounts of data, yet only a fraction is used to improve healthcare delivery-especially for equity-deserving communities. In Canada, Learning Health Systems (LHS) are guided by the Quadruple Aim: improving population health, enhancing patient and provider experience, and reducing costs, with equity now recognized as a critical additional aim. As LHS evolve, advancing health equity has become a core driver, particularly in Canada. An equitable LHS prioritizes inclusion, accessibility, and co-creation, ensuring that historically marginalized communities are active partners in shaping healthcare solutions. Community engagement is foundational to LHS, where individuals, families, and communities collaborate with clinicians, researchers, and decision-makers to drive meaningful improvements. This community case study describes how a large health authority in British Columbia integrated design thinking and a participatory action research approach to co-develop a vision for a community-centered LHS. Fifty diverse partners participated, including individuals and families, clinicians, non-clinical health staff, health administrators, researchers, and students. The project team drew on a Canadian LHS framework, appreciative inquiry, and design thinking to guide engagement activities. Participants co-designed a vision for LHS, proposing actions across six key areas, including (1) Legal and Ethical, (2) Science and Research, (3) Data and Technology, (4) Policy, Process, and Resources, (5) Indigenous Leadership & Participation, (6) Social, Community, and Equity. Through the sessions, lived experiences helped surface barriers and community priorities. Storytelling and Design Jam methods were key tools for fostering meaningful engagement. We propose practical considerations (INSPIRE) that researchers and policymakers can apply to enhance participation, foster equity, and ensure that Learning Health Systems remain community-driven and responsive to diverse needs: Inclusion first, Nurture Trust, Show impact, Partner with lived experience experts, Institutionalize diverse engagement, Recognize ethical responsibilities, and Ensure sustainability. Future research should investigate how to overcome barriers to participation, embed participatory approaches, and consider design-thinking in health system transformation. By focusing on community engagement, this case study demonstrates how LHS can be co-developed as inclusive and equity-driven.</p>","PeriodicalId":73088,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in health services","volume":"5 ","pages":"1620659"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12339457/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Engaging community to co-design learning health systems: lessons from storytelling and Design Jam, a community case study from British Columbia, Canada.\",\"authors\":\"Margaret Chen-Mei Lin, Krisztina Vasarhelyi, Karen Lok Yi Wong, Haruka Furuichi, Jim Mann, Annette Berndt, Kayoung Lee, Lori Benning, Lillian Hung\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/frhs.2025.1620659\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Health and research systems produce vast amounts of data, yet only a fraction is used to improve healthcare delivery-especially for equity-deserving communities. In Canada, Learning Health Systems (LHS) are guided by the Quadruple Aim: improving population health, enhancing patient and provider experience, and reducing costs, with equity now recognized as a critical additional aim. As LHS evolve, advancing health equity has become a core driver, particularly in Canada. An equitable LHS prioritizes inclusion, accessibility, and co-creation, ensuring that historically marginalized communities are active partners in shaping healthcare solutions. Community engagement is foundational to LHS, where individuals, families, and communities collaborate with clinicians, researchers, and decision-makers to drive meaningful improvements. This community case study describes how a large health authority in British Columbia integrated design thinking and a participatory action research approach to co-develop a vision for a community-centered LHS. Fifty diverse partners participated, including individuals and families, clinicians, non-clinical health staff, health administrators, researchers, and students. The project team drew on a Canadian LHS framework, appreciative inquiry, and design thinking to guide engagement activities. Participants co-designed a vision for LHS, proposing actions across six key areas, including (1) Legal and Ethical, (2) Science and Research, (3) Data and Technology, (4) Policy, Process, and Resources, (5) Indigenous Leadership & Participation, (6) Social, Community, and Equity. Through the sessions, lived experiences helped surface barriers and community priorities. Storytelling and Design Jam methods were key tools for fostering meaningful engagement. We propose practical considerations (INSPIRE) that researchers and policymakers can apply to enhance participation, foster equity, and ensure that Learning Health Systems remain community-driven and responsive to diverse needs: Inclusion first, Nurture Trust, Show impact, Partner with lived experience experts, Institutionalize diverse engagement, Recognize ethical responsibilities, and Ensure sustainability. Future research should investigate how to overcome barriers to participation, embed participatory approaches, and consider design-thinking in health system transformation. By focusing on community engagement, this case study demonstrates how LHS can be co-developed as inclusive and equity-driven.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in health services\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"1620659\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12339457/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in health services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2025.1620659\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in health services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2025.1620659","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

卫生和研究系统产生了大量的数据,但只有一小部分被用于改善医疗服务——尤其是对那些应该获得公平待遇的社区。在加拿大,学习型卫生系统(LHS)以四重目标为指导:改善人口健康,增强患者和提供者经验,降低成本,公平现在被认为是一个重要的附加目标。随着LHS的发展,促进卫生公平已成为核心驱动力,特别是在加拿大。公平的LHS优先考虑包容、可及性和共同创造,确保历史上被边缘化的社区成为形成医疗保健解决方案的积极合作伙伴。社区参与是LHS的基础,个人、家庭和社区与临床医生、研究人员和决策者合作,推动有意义的改进。本社区案例研究描述了不列颠哥伦比亚省的一个大型卫生当局如何将设计思维和参与性行动研究方法结合起来,共同制定以社区为中心的LHS愿景。50个不同的合作伙伴参与其中,包括个人和家庭、临床医生、非临床卫生工作人员、卫生管理人员、研究人员和学生。项目团队借鉴了加拿大LHS框架、欣赏式调查和设计思维来指导参与活动。与会者共同设计了LHS的愿景,提出了六个关键领域的行动建议,包括(1)法律和道德,(2)科学和研究,(3)数据和技术,(4)政策,流程和资源,(5)土著领导和参与,(6)社会,社区和公平。通过这些课程,生活经历有助于揭示障碍和社区优先事项。讲故事和Design Jam方法是培养有意义的用户粘性的关键工具。我们提出了一些实际的考虑(INSPIRE),研究人员和政策制定者可以应用这些考虑(INSPIRE)来加强参与,促进公平,并确保学习型卫生系统保持社区驱动并对各种需求做出反应:包容第一,培养信任,展示影响,与生活经验专家合作,将多样化的参与制度化,承认道德责任,并确保可持续性。未来的研究应探讨如何克服参与障碍,嵌入参与式方法,并在卫生系统转型中考虑设计思维。通过关注社区参与,本案例研究展示了如何在包容和公平驱动下共同发展LHS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Engaging community to co-design learning health systems: lessons from storytelling and Design Jam, a community case study from British Columbia, Canada.

Health and research systems produce vast amounts of data, yet only a fraction is used to improve healthcare delivery-especially for equity-deserving communities. In Canada, Learning Health Systems (LHS) are guided by the Quadruple Aim: improving population health, enhancing patient and provider experience, and reducing costs, with equity now recognized as a critical additional aim. As LHS evolve, advancing health equity has become a core driver, particularly in Canada. An equitable LHS prioritizes inclusion, accessibility, and co-creation, ensuring that historically marginalized communities are active partners in shaping healthcare solutions. Community engagement is foundational to LHS, where individuals, families, and communities collaborate with clinicians, researchers, and decision-makers to drive meaningful improvements. This community case study describes how a large health authority in British Columbia integrated design thinking and a participatory action research approach to co-develop a vision for a community-centered LHS. Fifty diverse partners participated, including individuals and families, clinicians, non-clinical health staff, health administrators, researchers, and students. The project team drew on a Canadian LHS framework, appreciative inquiry, and design thinking to guide engagement activities. Participants co-designed a vision for LHS, proposing actions across six key areas, including (1) Legal and Ethical, (2) Science and Research, (3) Data and Technology, (4) Policy, Process, and Resources, (5) Indigenous Leadership & Participation, (6) Social, Community, and Equity. Through the sessions, lived experiences helped surface barriers and community priorities. Storytelling and Design Jam methods were key tools for fostering meaningful engagement. We propose practical considerations (INSPIRE) that researchers and policymakers can apply to enhance participation, foster equity, and ensure that Learning Health Systems remain community-driven and responsive to diverse needs: Inclusion first, Nurture Trust, Show impact, Partner with lived experience experts, Institutionalize diverse engagement, Recognize ethical responsibilities, and Ensure sustainability. Future research should investigate how to overcome barriers to participation, embed participatory approaches, and consider design-thinking in health system transformation. By focusing on community engagement, this case study demonstrates how LHS can be co-developed as inclusive and equity-driven.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信