Alberto Farolfi, Chiara Casadei, Nicola Gentili, Sara Testoni, Francesca Rusconi, Emilio Francesco Giunta, Nicole Brighi, Giorgia Gurioli, Daniela Montanari, Gema Hernandez Ibarburu, Ugo De Giorgi
{"title":"卵巢癌患者骨髓增生异常综合征和急性髓系白血病风险与PARP抑制剂维持线相关","authors":"Alberto Farolfi, Chiara Casadei, Nicola Gentili, Sara Testoni, Francesca Rusconi, Emilio Francesco Giunta, Nicole Brighi, Giorgia Gurioli, Daniela Montanari, Gema Hernandez Ibarburu, Ugo De Giorgi","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyaf243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the risk of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) secondary to PARP inhibitors (PARPi), based on the line of treatment, in real-world ovarian cancer (OC) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the TriNetX platform, we compared a cohort (experimental A) of 3402 OC patients treated with first-line maintenance PARPi to a control cohort of 1653 OC patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy without PARPi. Experimental group B included 356 OC patients treated with PARPi after a platinum-sensitive relapse and was compared to a control cohort of 1503 patients who had not received PARPi after 2 lines of platinum-based chemotherapy. The cohorts were propensity score matched (PSM) 1:1 (experimental A vs control 1 and experimental B vs control 2) for age, race, bevacizumab treatment, and genetic susceptibility to neoplasms. A hazard ratio (HR) was used to compare the incidence of MDS and AML between the matched cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the first-line setting, 2 groups of 1346 matched OC patients (mean age 59.8 ± 10.2 SD) were evaluated. The overall incidence of MDS or AML was 1.9% and 0.1% in the experimental A and control groups, respectively (HR = 2.46; 95% CI 1.27-4.75, P = .006). For the platinum--sensitive relapse setting, the HR was 1.76 (95% CI 0.42-7.37, P = .432). No significant differences were observed between the various PARPi used.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study indicates that PARPi may increase the risk of MDS or AML after first-line maintenance treatment. No significant differences were found across the types of PARPi used.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk of myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia related to PARP inhibitor maintenance line in real-world ovarian cancer patients.\",\"authors\":\"Alberto Farolfi, Chiara Casadei, Nicola Gentili, Sara Testoni, Francesca Rusconi, Emilio Francesco Giunta, Nicole Brighi, Giorgia Gurioli, Daniela Montanari, Gema Hernandez Ibarburu, Ugo De Giorgi\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oncolo/oyaf243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the risk of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) secondary to PARP inhibitors (PARPi), based on the line of treatment, in real-world ovarian cancer (OC) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the TriNetX platform, we compared a cohort (experimental A) of 3402 OC patients treated with first-line maintenance PARPi to a control cohort of 1653 OC patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy without PARPi. Experimental group B included 356 OC patients treated with PARPi after a platinum-sensitive relapse and was compared to a control cohort of 1503 patients who had not received PARPi after 2 lines of platinum-based chemotherapy. The cohorts were propensity score matched (PSM) 1:1 (experimental A vs control 1 and experimental B vs control 2) for age, race, bevacizumab treatment, and genetic susceptibility to neoplasms. A hazard ratio (HR) was used to compare the incidence of MDS and AML between the matched cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the first-line setting, 2 groups of 1346 matched OC patients (mean age 59.8 ± 10.2 SD) were evaluated. The overall incidence of MDS or AML was 1.9% and 0.1% in the experimental A and control groups, respectively (HR = 2.46; 95% CI 1.27-4.75, P = .006). For the platinum--sensitive relapse setting, the HR was 1.76 (95% CI 0.42-7.37, P = .432). No significant differences were observed between the various PARPi used.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study indicates that PARPi may increase the risk of MDS or AML after first-line maintenance treatment. No significant differences were found across the types of PARPi used.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncologist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf243\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf243","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究目的:评估现实世界卵巢癌(OC)患者中PARP抑制剂(PARPi)继发于骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)和急性髓系白血病(AML)的风险,基于治疗方案。方法:使用TriNetX平台,我们比较了3,402例接受一线维持性PARPi治疗的OC患者队列(实验a)和1,653例接受铂类化疗而不接受PARPi治疗的OC患者的对照队列。实验B组包括356例铂敏感复发后接受PARPi治疗的OC患者,并与1503例在两行铂类化疗后未接受PARPi治疗的对照组患者进行比较。这些队列在年龄、种族、贝伐单抗治疗和对肿瘤的遗传易感性方面的倾向评分匹配(PSM)为1:1(实验A与对照1,实验B与对照2)。使用风险比(HR)比较匹配队列之间MDS和AML的发生率。结果:在一线环境中,评估了两组1346例匹配的OC患者(平均年龄59.8 +/- 10.2 SD)。实验A组和对照组MDS和AML的总发病率分别为1.9%和0.1% (HR = 2.46;95% CI 1.27-4.75, p = 0.006)。对于铂敏感的复发组,HR为1.76 (95% CI 0.42-7.37, p = 0.432)。在使用的各种PARPi之间没有观察到显著差异。结论:我们的研究表明PARPi可能增加一线维持治疗后MDS或AML的风险。在使用的PARPi类型之间没有发现显着差异。
Risk of myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia related to PARP inhibitor maintenance line in real-world ovarian cancer patients.
Objective: To estimate the risk of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) secondary to PARP inhibitors (PARPi), based on the line of treatment, in real-world ovarian cancer (OC) patients.
Methods: Using the TriNetX platform, we compared a cohort (experimental A) of 3402 OC patients treated with first-line maintenance PARPi to a control cohort of 1653 OC patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy without PARPi. Experimental group B included 356 OC patients treated with PARPi after a platinum-sensitive relapse and was compared to a control cohort of 1503 patients who had not received PARPi after 2 lines of platinum-based chemotherapy. The cohorts were propensity score matched (PSM) 1:1 (experimental A vs control 1 and experimental B vs control 2) for age, race, bevacizumab treatment, and genetic susceptibility to neoplasms. A hazard ratio (HR) was used to compare the incidence of MDS and AML between the matched cohorts.
Results: In the first-line setting, 2 groups of 1346 matched OC patients (mean age 59.8 ± 10.2 SD) were evaluated. The overall incidence of MDS or AML was 1.9% and 0.1% in the experimental A and control groups, respectively (HR = 2.46; 95% CI 1.27-4.75, P = .006). For the platinum--sensitive relapse setting, the HR was 1.76 (95% CI 0.42-7.37, P = .432). No significant differences were observed between the various PARPi used.
Conclusions: Our study indicates that PARPi may increase the risk of MDS or AML after first-line maintenance treatment. No significant differences were found across the types of PARPi used.
期刊介绍:
The Oncologist® is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into the best multidimensional care for cancer patients. Thus, The Oncologist is committed to helping physicians excel in this ever-expanding environment through the publication of timely reviews, original studies, and commentaries on important developments. We believe that the practice of oncology requires both an understanding of a range of disciplines encompassing basic science related to cancer, translational research, and clinical practice, but also the socioeconomic and psychosocial factors that determine access to care and quality of life and function following cancer treatment.