Sammila Andrade Abdala, Sanaa Belabbes, Filipe Canto Oliveira, Nisrine Griba, Safwane Mouwafaq
{"title":"城市绿地中的体育活动:参与式方法的系统回顾。","authors":"Sammila Andrade Abdala, Sanaa Belabbes, Filipe Canto Oliveira, Nisrine Griba, Safwane Mouwafaq","doi":"10.1093/heapro/daaf133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Urban green spaces (UGSs) are most effective in promoting physical activity (PA) when they are designed to align with the needs of the communities they serve, and participatory approaches address this need by capturing local knowledge and driving meaningful action. This systematic review aims to synthesize evidence on how participatory approaches address PA in UGS, analyzing variations in their context, process, output, outcome, and impact. A systematic search was conducted in Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and ScienceDirect for literature from January 2000 to January 2025. Studies were included if they employed participatory approaches for assessing or promoting PA in UGS. Data extraction followed the comparison of the participatory processes framework, and study quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool 2018. Of 1926 records, 13 studies met the inclusion criteria. The results show that most approaches were researcher-led and operated at the local and regional levels. Despite being labeled participatory, several studies had a limited degree of participation, focusing mostly on (co-)data collection. Most studies had also limited spatial, social, and temporal reach, often confined to the study area and participant group. However, some approaches successfully increased PA in UGS and demonstrated positive social and individual benefits, with (co-)design and citizen science projects standing out for their strong participation and broader social impacts. Future studies and interventions should involve participants throughout all stages, establish clear participatory frameworks, enhance scalability, and incorporate strategies for long-term sustainability to optimize outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":54256,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion International","volume":"40 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physical activity in urban green spaces: a systematic review of participatory approaches.\",\"authors\":\"Sammila Andrade Abdala, Sanaa Belabbes, Filipe Canto Oliveira, Nisrine Griba, Safwane Mouwafaq\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/heapro/daaf133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Urban green spaces (UGSs) are most effective in promoting physical activity (PA) when they are designed to align with the needs of the communities they serve, and participatory approaches address this need by capturing local knowledge and driving meaningful action. This systematic review aims to synthesize evidence on how participatory approaches address PA in UGS, analyzing variations in their context, process, output, outcome, and impact. A systematic search was conducted in Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and ScienceDirect for literature from January 2000 to January 2025. Studies were included if they employed participatory approaches for assessing or promoting PA in UGS. Data extraction followed the comparison of the participatory processes framework, and study quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool 2018. Of 1926 records, 13 studies met the inclusion criteria. The results show that most approaches were researcher-led and operated at the local and regional levels. Despite being labeled participatory, several studies had a limited degree of participation, focusing mostly on (co-)data collection. Most studies had also limited spatial, social, and temporal reach, often confined to the study area and participant group. However, some approaches successfully increased PA in UGS and demonstrated positive social and individual benefits, with (co-)design and citizen science projects standing out for their strong participation and broader social impacts. Future studies and interventions should involve participants throughout all stages, establish clear participatory frameworks, enhance scalability, and incorporate strategies for long-term sustainability to optimize outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Promotion International\",\"volume\":\"40 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Promotion International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daaf133\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daaf133","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
当城市绿色空间(UGSs)的设计与所服务社区的需求保持一致时,它们在促进身体活动(PA)方面最为有效,参与式方法通过获取当地知识和推动有意义的行动来满足这一需求。本系统综述旨在综合有关参与式方法如何在UGS中解决PA问题的证据,分析其背景、过程、产出、结果和影响方面的变化。系统检索Scopus、Web of Science、PubMed、ScienceDirect等网站2000年1月至2025年1月的文献。如果研究采用参与式方法评估或促进UGS的PA,则纳入研究。数据提取遵循参与式过程框架的比较,并使用混合方法评估工具2018评估研究质量。在1926项记录中,有13项研究符合纳入标准。结果表明,大多数方法是由研究人员主导的,并在地方和区域层面上运行。尽管被贴上了参与性的标签,但一些研究的参与程度有限,主要集中在(共同)数据收集上。大多数研究的空间、社会和时间范围有限,通常局限于研究区域和参与者群体。然而,一些方法成功地增加了UGS的PA,并显示出积极的社会和个人效益,(共同)设计和公民科学项目因其强大的参与和更广泛的社会影响而脱颖而出。未来的研究和干预措施应涉及所有阶段的参与者,建立明确的参与框架,增强可扩展性,并纳入长期可持续性战略,以优化结果。
Physical activity in urban green spaces: a systematic review of participatory approaches.
Urban green spaces (UGSs) are most effective in promoting physical activity (PA) when they are designed to align with the needs of the communities they serve, and participatory approaches address this need by capturing local knowledge and driving meaningful action. This systematic review aims to synthesize evidence on how participatory approaches address PA in UGS, analyzing variations in their context, process, output, outcome, and impact. A systematic search was conducted in Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and ScienceDirect for literature from January 2000 to January 2025. Studies were included if they employed participatory approaches for assessing or promoting PA in UGS. Data extraction followed the comparison of the participatory processes framework, and study quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool 2018. Of 1926 records, 13 studies met the inclusion criteria. The results show that most approaches were researcher-led and operated at the local and regional levels. Despite being labeled participatory, several studies had a limited degree of participation, focusing mostly on (co-)data collection. Most studies had also limited spatial, social, and temporal reach, often confined to the study area and participant group. However, some approaches successfully increased PA in UGS and demonstrated positive social and individual benefits, with (co-)design and citizen science projects standing out for their strong participation and broader social impacts. Future studies and interventions should involve participants throughout all stages, establish clear participatory frameworks, enhance scalability, and incorporate strategies for long-term sustainability to optimize outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Health Promotion International contains refereed original articles, reviews, and debate articles on major themes and innovations in the health promotion field. In line with the remits of the series of global conferences on health promotion the journal expressly invites contributions from sectors beyond health. These may include education, employment, government, the media, industry, environmental agencies, and community networks. As the thought journal of the international health promotion movement we seek in particular theoretical, methodological and activist advances to the field. Thus, the journal provides a unique focal point for articles of high quality that describe not only theories and concepts, research projects and policy formulation, but also planned and spontaneous activities, organizational change, as well as social and environmental development.