[大众参与式康复研究:对职业康复中社会工作项目的洞察]。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-12 DOI:10.1055/a-2618-6200
Ruth Enggruber, Julia Seefeld, Silke Tophoven
{"title":"[大众参与式康复研究:对职业康复中社会工作项目的洞察]。","authors":"Ruth Enggruber, Julia Seefeld, Silke Tophoven","doi":"10.1055/a-2618-6200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Participatory research is increasingly being promoted in rehabilitation sciences. It is now recommended that this type of research be consistently considered in funding applications for rehabilitation research. However, the structural paradoxes and other challenges associated with participatory research are still neglected. There is also a lack of systematic evaluations of whether and to what extent participatory research fulfills the epistemological and democratic expectations associated with it. Against this background, the implementation of a participatory research style in a research project will be presented and how participatory research can contribute to more meaningful findings and empowerment will be critically reflected upon and contextualized.In the ANSAB research project, a participatory research style in the sense of advisory participation was implemented and vocational rehabilitants were involved in the project advisory board. They were also included in the design of the interview guidelines and the interpretation of the results. In addition, narrative interviews were conducted with seven of the participating rehabilitants and analyzed using content analysis. The insights gained in this way and the empirical material made it possible to achieve results on the implementation of participatory rehabilitation research.The results showed that the participating vocational rehabilitants felt empowered by their work on the advisory board and would also like to empower other people in a similar situation. Furthermore, they were actively involved in the research process and thus contributed to the application-oriented acquisition of knowledge.On the one hand, the results are encouraging with regard to the expectations associated with participatory research, but on the other hand, they also point to the challenges and limitations of this style of research. Based on our findings and the results of other research projects that pursue a participatory research style, recommendations for implementation should be revised again, considering the different areas of application in the rehabilitation sciences.</p>","PeriodicalId":54504,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation","volume":"64 4","pages":"215-221"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Popular participatory rehabilitation research: insights into a project on social work in occupational Rehabilitation].\",\"authors\":\"Ruth Enggruber, Julia Seefeld, Silke Tophoven\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2618-6200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Participatory research is increasingly being promoted in rehabilitation sciences. It is now recommended that this type of research be consistently considered in funding applications for rehabilitation research. However, the structural paradoxes and other challenges associated with participatory research are still neglected. There is also a lack of systematic evaluations of whether and to what extent participatory research fulfills the epistemological and democratic expectations associated with it. Against this background, the implementation of a participatory research style in a research project will be presented and how participatory research can contribute to more meaningful findings and empowerment will be critically reflected upon and contextualized.In the ANSAB research project, a participatory research style in the sense of advisory participation was implemented and vocational rehabilitants were involved in the project advisory board. They were also included in the design of the interview guidelines and the interpretation of the results. In addition, narrative interviews were conducted with seven of the participating rehabilitants and analyzed using content analysis. The insights gained in this way and the empirical material made it possible to achieve results on the implementation of participatory rehabilitation research.The results showed that the participating vocational rehabilitants felt empowered by their work on the advisory board and would also like to empower other people in a similar situation. Furthermore, they were actively involved in the research process and thus contributed to the application-oriented acquisition of knowledge.On the one hand, the results are encouraging with regard to the expectations associated with participatory research, but on the other hand, they also point to the challenges and limitations of this style of research. Based on our findings and the results of other research projects that pursue a participatory research style, recommendations for implementation should be revised again, considering the different areas of application in the rehabilitation sciences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"64 4\",\"pages\":\"215-221\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2618-6200\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2618-6200","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在康复科学领域,参与性研究正日益得到推广。现在建议在资助康复研究的申请中一贯考虑这类研究。然而,与参与性研究相关的结构悖论和其他挑战仍然被忽视。对于参与式研究是否以及在多大程度上满足与之相关的认识论和民主期望,也缺乏系统的评估。在此背景下,将介绍在研究项目中实施参与式研究风格,并将批判性地反思参与式研究如何有助于更有意义的发现和赋权。在ANSAB研究项目中,实施了咨询参与意义上的参与式研究方式,并让职业康复者参与项目咨询委员会。他们也被包括在访谈准则的设计和结果的解释中。此外,对7名参与的康复者进行叙述性访谈,并采用内容分析法进行分析。通过这种方式获得的见解和经验材料使参与式康复研究的实施取得成果成为可能。结果表明,参与的职业康复者感到他们在咨询委员会的工作赋予了他们权力,并希望赋予处于类似情况的其他人权力。此外,他们积极参与研究过程,从而有助于以应用为导向的知识获取。一方面,关于参与性研究的期望,结果令人鼓舞,但另一方面,它们也指出了这种研究方式的挑战和局限性。根据我们的研究结果和其他追求参与式研究风格的研究项目的结果,考虑到康复科学的不同应用领域,实施建议应再次修订。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Popular participatory rehabilitation research: insights into a project on social work in occupational Rehabilitation].

Participatory research is increasingly being promoted in rehabilitation sciences. It is now recommended that this type of research be consistently considered in funding applications for rehabilitation research. However, the structural paradoxes and other challenges associated with participatory research are still neglected. There is also a lack of systematic evaluations of whether and to what extent participatory research fulfills the epistemological and democratic expectations associated with it. Against this background, the implementation of a participatory research style in a research project will be presented and how participatory research can contribute to more meaningful findings and empowerment will be critically reflected upon and contextualized.In the ANSAB research project, a participatory research style in the sense of advisory participation was implemented and vocational rehabilitants were involved in the project advisory board. They were also included in the design of the interview guidelines and the interpretation of the results. In addition, narrative interviews were conducted with seven of the participating rehabilitants and analyzed using content analysis. The insights gained in this way and the empirical material made it possible to achieve results on the implementation of participatory rehabilitation research.The results showed that the participating vocational rehabilitants felt empowered by their work on the advisory board and would also like to empower other people in a similar situation. Furthermore, they were actively involved in the research process and thus contributed to the application-oriented acquisition of knowledge.On the one hand, the results are encouraging with regard to the expectations associated with participatory research, but on the other hand, they also point to the challenges and limitations of this style of research. Based on our findings and the results of other research projects that pursue a participatory research style, recommendations for implementation should be revised again, considering the different areas of application in the rehabilitation sciences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Die Zeitschrift Die Rehabilitation richtet sich an Mitarbeiterinnen und Mitarbeiter in Einrichtungen, Forschungsinstitutionen und Trägern der Rehabilitation. Sie berichtet über die medizinischen, gesetzlichen, politischen und gesellschaftlichen Grundlagen und Rahmenbedingungen der Rehabilitation und über internationale Entwicklungen auf diesem Gebiet. Schwerpunkte sind dabei Beiträge zu Rehabilitationspraxis (medizinische, berufliche und soziale Rehabilitation, Qualitätsmanagement, neue Konzepte und Versorgungsmodelle zur Anwendung der ICF, Bewegungstherapie etc.), Rehabilitationsforschung (praxisrelevante Ergebnisse, Methoden und Assessments, Leitlinienentwicklung, sozialmedizinische Fragen), Public Health, Sozialmedizin Gesundheits-System-Forschung sowie die daraus resultierenden Probleme.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信