自动注射器肌注纳美芬与鼻内纳洛酮逆转芬太尼诱导的健康受试者呼吸抑制

IF 2.3 4区 医学
Alessandra Cipriano, Ellie He, Manjunath Shet, Glen Apseloff, Stephen C Harris
{"title":"自动注射器肌注纳美芬与鼻内纳洛酮逆转芬太尼诱导的健康受试者呼吸抑制","authors":"Alessandra Cipriano, Ellie He, Manjunath Shet, Glen Apseloff, Stephen C Harris","doi":"10.1002/jcph.70088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As illegally made fentanyl and congeners continue to drive overdose deaths in the US, experts have called for stronger and longer-lasting antagonists. A randomized, 4-period, 2-treatment crossover replicate-design study in healthy moderately-experienced opioid users (n = 24) evaluated the reversal of opioid-induced respiratory depression (OIRD) by intramuscular (IM) nalmefene 1.5 mg administered by auto-injector delivering a formulation developed for faster onset, compared to intranasal (IN) naloxone 4 mg. Fentanyl infusions were administered to induce a 50% reduction in minute ventilation (MV). Reversal of OIRD, pharmacokinetics, and safety were investigated under steady-state fentanyl agonism. For the primary endpoint, nalmefene demonstrated superiority at 5 min with an MV increase of 4.59 L/min, more than twice the 1.99 L/min increase for naloxone (p < .0001). Nalmefene superiority was also demonstrated at 10, 15, 20, and 30 min, while non-inferiority was demonstrated at 2.5 and 90 min. The time-course of mean antagonist concentrations correlated with increases in mean MV, peaking at approximately 5-10 min following nalmefene compared to 20-30 min following naloxone. Decreases in transcutaneous CO<sub>2</sub> (TCO<sub>2</sub>) followed a similar time-course with a slight delay. At each threshold of percent reversal (25%-100%), nalmefene consistently showed a faster time to onset than naloxone. Both antagonist treatments were tolerated with no serious adverse events. This study shows that nalmefene 1.5 mg IM administered by auto-injector achieved a faster onset, higher magnitude, and longer duration of reversal of OIRD compared to naloxone 4 mg IN and represents another option for the treatment of opioid overdose.</p>","PeriodicalId":48908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reversal of Fentanyl-Induced Respiratory Depression in Healthy Subjects by Intramuscular Nalmefene Administered by Auto-Injector Versus Intranasal Naloxone.\",\"authors\":\"Alessandra Cipriano, Ellie He, Manjunath Shet, Glen Apseloff, Stephen C Harris\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jcph.70088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>As illegally made fentanyl and congeners continue to drive overdose deaths in the US, experts have called for stronger and longer-lasting antagonists. A randomized, 4-period, 2-treatment crossover replicate-design study in healthy moderately-experienced opioid users (n = 24) evaluated the reversal of opioid-induced respiratory depression (OIRD) by intramuscular (IM) nalmefene 1.5 mg administered by auto-injector delivering a formulation developed for faster onset, compared to intranasal (IN) naloxone 4 mg. Fentanyl infusions were administered to induce a 50% reduction in minute ventilation (MV). Reversal of OIRD, pharmacokinetics, and safety were investigated under steady-state fentanyl agonism. For the primary endpoint, nalmefene demonstrated superiority at 5 min with an MV increase of 4.59 L/min, more than twice the 1.99 L/min increase for naloxone (p < .0001). Nalmefene superiority was also demonstrated at 10, 15, 20, and 30 min, while non-inferiority was demonstrated at 2.5 and 90 min. The time-course of mean antagonist concentrations correlated with increases in mean MV, peaking at approximately 5-10 min following nalmefene compared to 20-30 min following naloxone. Decreases in transcutaneous CO<sub>2</sub> (TCO<sub>2</sub>) followed a similar time-course with a slight delay. At each threshold of percent reversal (25%-100%), nalmefene consistently showed a faster time to onset than naloxone. Both antagonist treatments were tolerated with no serious adverse events. This study shows that nalmefene 1.5 mg IM administered by auto-injector achieved a faster onset, higher magnitude, and longer duration of reversal of OIRD compared to naloxone 4 mg IN and represents another option for the treatment of opioid overdose.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.70088\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.70088","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于非法制造的芬太尼及其同类药物继续导致美国过量死亡,专家们呼吁使用更强、更持久的拮抗剂。一项随机、4期、2个治疗的交叉重复设计研究在健康、有中等经验的阿片类药物使用者(n = 24)中进行,评估了肌肉注射(IM)纳美芬(1.5 mg)与鼻内(in)纳洛酮(4mg)相比,自动注射器给药可更快地逆转阿片类药物诱导的呼吸抑制(OIRD)。芬太尼输注诱导每分钟通气(MV)减少50%。在稳态芬太尼激动作用下,研究了OIRD的逆转、药代动力学和安全性。对于主要终点,纳美芬在5分钟表现出优越性,MV增加4.59 L/min,是纳洛酮增加1.99 L/min的两倍多(p 2 (TCO2)遵循相似的时间过程,略有延迟。在每个百分比逆转阈值(25%-100%),纳美芬始终显示比纳洛酮更快的发病时间。两种拮抗剂治疗均耐受,无严重不良事件。本研究表明,与纳洛酮4mg相比,自动注射器给药的纳美芬1.5 mg IM起效更快、强度更高、逆转OIRD持续时间更长,是治疗阿片类药物过量的另一种选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reversal of Fentanyl-Induced Respiratory Depression in Healthy Subjects by Intramuscular Nalmefene Administered by Auto-Injector Versus Intranasal Naloxone.

As illegally made fentanyl and congeners continue to drive overdose deaths in the US, experts have called for stronger and longer-lasting antagonists. A randomized, 4-period, 2-treatment crossover replicate-design study in healthy moderately-experienced opioid users (n = 24) evaluated the reversal of opioid-induced respiratory depression (OIRD) by intramuscular (IM) nalmefene 1.5 mg administered by auto-injector delivering a formulation developed for faster onset, compared to intranasal (IN) naloxone 4 mg. Fentanyl infusions were administered to induce a 50% reduction in minute ventilation (MV). Reversal of OIRD, pharmacokinetics, and safety were investigated under steady-state fentanyl agonism. For the primary endpoint, nalmefene demonstrated superiority at 5 min with an MV increase of 4.59 L/min, more than twice the 1.99 L/min increase for naloxone (p < .0001). Nalmefene superiority was also demonstrated at 10, 15, 20, and 30 min, while non-inferiority was demonstrated at 2.5 and 90 min. The time-course of mean antagonist concentrations correlated with increases in mean MV, peaking at approximately 5-10 min following nalmefene compared to 20-30 min following naloxone. Decreases in transcutaneous CO2 (TCO2) followed a similar time-course with a slight delay. At each threshold of percent reversal (25%-100%), nalmefene consistently showed a faster time to onset than naloxone. Both antagonist treatments were tolerated with no serious adverse events. This study shows that nalmefene 1.5 mg IM administered by auto-injector achieved a faster onset, higher magnitude, and longer duration of reversal of OIRD compared to naloxone 4 mg IN and represents another option for the treatment of opioid overdose.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Journal of Clinical Pharmacology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
3.40%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (JCP) is a Human Pharmacology journal designed to provide physicians, pharmacists, research scientists, regulatory scientists, drug developers and academic colleagues a forum to present research in all aspects of Clinical Pharmacology. This includes original research in pharmacokinetics, pharmacogenetics/pharmacogenomics, pharmacometrics, physiologic based pharmacokinetic modeling, drug interactions, therapeutic drug monitoring, regulatory sciences (including unique methods of data analysis), special population studies, drug development, pharmacovigilance, womens’ health, pediatric pharmacology, and pharmacodynamics. Additionally, JCP publishes review articles, commentaries and educational manuscripts. The Journal also serves as an instrument to disseminate Public Policy statements from the American College of Clinical Pharmacology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信