Nicholas Genes, Gregory Simon, Christian Koziatek, Jung G Kim, Kar-Mun Woo, Cassidy Dahn, Leland Chan, Batia Wiesenfeld
{"title":"生成AI摘要以促进ED切换。","authors":"Nicholas Genes, Gregory Simon, Christian Koziatek, Jung G Kim, Kar-Mun Woo, Cassidy Dahn, Leland Chan, Batia Wiesenfeld","doi":"10.1055/a-2681-5008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Emergency department (ED) handoff to inpatient teams is a potential source of error. Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has shown promise in succinctly summarizing large quantities of clinical data and may help improve ED handoff.Our objectives were to: (1) evaluate the accuracy, clinical utility, and safety of AI-generated ED-to-inpatient handoff summaries; (2) identify patient and visit characteristics influencing summary effectiveness; and (3) characterize potential error patterns to inform implementation strategies.This exploratory study evaluated AI-generated handoff summaries at an urban academic ED (February-April 2024). A Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant GPT-4 model generated summaries aligned with the IPASS framework; ED providers assessed summary accuracy, usefulness, and safety through on-shift surveys.Among 50 cases, median quality and usefulness scores were 4/5 (standard error = 0.13). Safety concerns arose in 6% of cases, with issues including data omissions and mischaracterizations. Consultation status significantly affected usefulness scores (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Omissions of relevant medications, laboratory results, and other essential details were noted (<i>n</i> = 6), and emergency medicine clinicians disagreed with some AI characterizations of patient stability, vitals, and workup (<i>n</i> = 8). The most common response was positive impressions of the technology incorporated into the handoff process (<i>n</i> = 11).This exploratory provider-in-the-loop model demonstrated clinical acceptability and highlighted areas for refinement. Future studies should incorporate recipient perspectives and examine clinical outcomes to scale and optimize AI implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":" ","pages":"1185-1191"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12473522/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Generative Artificial Intelligence Summaries to Facilitate Emergency Department Handoff.\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas Genes, Gregory Simon, Christian Koziatek, Jung G Kim, Kar-Mun Woo, Cassidy Dahn, Leland Chan, Batia Wiesenfeld\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2681-5008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Emergency department (ED) handoff to inpatient teams is a potential source of error. Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has shown promise in succinctly summarizing large quantities of clinical data and may help improve ED handoff.Our objectives were to: (1) evaluate the accuracy, clinical utility, and safety of AI-generated ED-to-inpatient handoff summaries; (2) identify patient and visit characteristics influencing summary effectiveness; and (3) characterize potential error patterns to inform implementation strategies.This exploratory study evaluated AI-generated handoff summaries at an urban academic ED (February-April 2024). A Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant GPT-4 model generated summaries aligned with the IPASS framework; ED providers assessed summary accuracy, usefulness, and safety through on-shift surveys.Among 50 cases, median quality and usefulness scores were 4/5 (standard error = 0.13). Safety concerns arose in 6% of cases, with issues including data omissions and mischaracterizations. Consultation status significantly affected usefulness scores (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Omissions of relevant medications, laboratory results, and other essential details were noted (<i>n</i> = 6), and emergency medicine clinicians disagreed with some AI characterizations of patient stability, vitals, and workup (<i>n</i> = 8). The most common response was positive impressions of the technology incorporated into the handoff process (<i>n</i> = 11).This exploratory provider-in-the-loop model demonstrated clinical acceptability and highlighted areas for refinement. Future studies should incorporate recipient perspectives and examine clinical outcomes to scale and optimize AI implementation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1185-1191\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12473522/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2681-5008\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2681-5008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Generative Artificial Intelligence Summaries to Facilitate Emergency Department Handoff.
Emergency department (ED) handoff to inpatient teams is a potential source of error. Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has shown promise in succinctly summarizing large quantities of clinical data and may help improve ED handoff.Our objectives were to: (1) evaluate the accuracy, clinical utility, and safety of AI-generated ED-to-inpatient handoff summaries; (2) identify patient and visit characteristics influencing summary effectiveness; and (3) characterize potential error patterns to inform implementation strategies.This exploratory study evaluated AI-generated handoff summaries at an urban academic ED (February-April 2024). A Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant GPT-4 model generated summaries aligned with the IPASS framework; ED providers assessed summary accuracy, usefulness, and safety through on-shift surveys.Among 50 cases, median quality and usefulness scores were 4/5 (standard error = 0.13). Safety concerns arose in 6% of cases, with issues including data omissions and mischaracterizations. Consultation status significantly affected usefulness scores (p < 0.05). Omissions of relevant medications, laboratory results, and other essential details were noted (n = 6), and emergency medicine clinicians disagreed with some AI characterizations of patient stability, vitals, and workup (n = 8). The most common response was positive impressions of the technology incorporated into the handoff process (n = 11).This exploratory provider-in-the-loop model demonstrated clinical acceptability and highlighted areas for refinement. Future studies should incorporate recipient perspectives and examine clinical outcomes to scale and optimize AI implementation.
期刊介绍:
ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.