第一扫视潜伏期的个体差异预测了寻找轮廓整合目标时的显性行为。

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
VISUAL COGNITION Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-11 DOI:10.1080/13506285.2025.2486493
Carly J Leonard
{"title":"第一扫视潜伏期的个体差异预测了寻找轮廓整合目标时的显性行为。","authors":"Carly J Leonard","doi":"10.1080/13506285.2025.2486493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During everyday functioning, the visual world is explored by using saccadic eye movements to direct the information-rich fovea to specific locations. These eye movements are guided by visual input from outside of the fovea, where processes of perceptual organization piece together scene and object structure, including contour information. The current study investigates variation in how the typical population uses eye movements to complete a search for a closed-contour target formed by oriented gabor patches. Performance at contour integration tasks varies across a range of clinical populations, although it is unknown the degree to which performance differs within the typical population and if these differences relate to how individuals move their eyes during the task. The results show large variation in first saccade latency between individuals, with these differences correlating with first saccade accuracy and the total number of fixations needed to complete the task. Within-subject performance variation across trials mirrored these effects, although equivalent changes in first saccade latency did not influence saccadic behavior for all participants in the same way. This finding that longer first saccade latency improves eye movement guidance differently across participants is discussed in terms of the potential benefits of having additional time for recurrent processing and individual differences in ability to spatially spread attention.</p>","PeriodicalId":47961,"journal":{"name":"VISUAL COGNITION","volume":"32 8","pages":"675-686"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12338195/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Individual differences in first saccade latency predict overt behavior during search for a contour integration target.\",\"authors\":\"Carly J Leonard\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13506285.2025.2486493\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>During everyday functioning, the visual world is explored by using saccadic eye movements to direct the information-rich fovea to specific locations. These eye movements are guided by visual input from outside of the fovea, where processes of perceptual organization piece together scene and object structure, including contour information. The current study investigates variation in how the typical population uses eye movements to complete a search for a closed-contour target formed by oriented gabor patches. Performance at contour integration tasks varies across a range of clinical populations, although it is unknown the degree to which performance differs within the typical population and if these differences relate to how individuals move their eyes during the task. The results show large variation in first saccade latency between individuals, with these differences correlating with first saccade accuracy and the total number of fixations needed to complete the task. Within-subject performance variation across trials mirrored these effects, although equivalent changes in first saccade latency did not influence saccadic behavior for all participants in the same way. This finding that longer first saccade latency improves eye movement guidance differently across participants is discussed in terms of the potential benefits of having additional time for recurrent processing and individual differences in ability to spatially spread attention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47961,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"VISUAL COGNITION\",\"volume\":\"32 8\",\"pages\":\"675-686\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12338195/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"VISUAL COGNITION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2025.2486493\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VISUAL COGNITION","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2025.2486493","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在日常运作中,视觉世界是通过使用跳眼运动来引导信息丰富的中央凹到特定的位置。这些眼球运动是由来自中央凹外部的视觉输入引导的,在那里,感知组织的过程将场景和物体结构,包括轮廓信息拼凑在一起。目前的研究调查了典型人群如何使用眼球运动来完成搜索由定向gabor斑块形成的封闭轮廓目标的变化。轮廓整合任务的表现在临床人群中有所不同,尽管在典型人群中表现差异的程度以及这些差异是否与个人在任务中如何移动眼睛有关尚不清楚。结果显示,个体间的第一扫视延迟有很大差异,这些差异与第一扫视准确性和完成任务所需注视的总数有关。不同试验的受试者表现差异反映了这些效应,尽管相同的第一次扫视延迟变化并没有以相同的方式影响所有参与者的扫视行为。第一次扫视延迟的延长对不同参与者的眼球运动引导有不同的促进作用,这一发现从有额外时间进行重复加工的潜在好处和空间分散注意力能力的个体差异两方面进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Individual differences in first saccade latency predict overt behavior during search for a contour integration target.

During everyday functioning, the visual world is explored by using saccadic eye movements to direct the information-rich fovea to specific locations. These eye movements are guided by visual input from outside of the fovea, where processes of perceptual organization piece together scene and object structure, including contour information. The current study investigates variation in how the typical population uses eye movements to complete a search for a closed-contour target formed by oriented gabor patches. Performance at contour integration tasks varies across a range of clinical populations, although it is unknown the degree to which performance differs within the typical population and if these differences relate to how individuals move their eyes during the task. The results show large variation in first saccade latency between individuals, with these differences correlating with first saccade accuracy and the total number of fixations needed to complete the task. Within-subject performance variation across trials mirrored these effects, although equivalent changes in first saccade latency did not influence saccadic behavior for all participants in the same way. This finding that longer first saccade latency improves eye movement guidance differently across participants is discussed in terms of the potential benefits of having additional time for recurrent processing and individual differences in ability to spatially spread attention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
VISUAL COGNITION
VISUAL COGNITION PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Visual Cognition publishes new empirical research that increases theoretical understanding of human visual cognition. Studies may be concerned with any aspect of visual cognition such as object, face, and scene recognition; visual attention and search; short-term and long-term visual memory; visual word recognition and reading; eye movement control and active vision; and visual imagery. The journal is devoted to research at the interface of visual perception and cognition and does not typically publish papers in areas of perception or psychophysics that are covered by the many publication outlets for those topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信