Fit2Thrive移动健康体育活动促进干预组件在乳腺癌幸存者中的可行性和可接受性

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Payton Solk, Jing Song, Jean Reading, Julia Starikovsky, Erin Cullather, Shirlene Wang, Kristina Hasanaj, Whitney A Morelli, Bonnie Spring, David Cella, Frank Penedo, Ron Ackermann, Kerry S Courneya, Juned Siddique, Julia Frey, Siobhan M Phillips
{"title":"Fit2Thrive移动健康体育活动促进干预组件在乳腺癌幸存者中的可行性和可接受性","authors":"Payton Solk, Jing Song, Jean Reading, Julia Starikovsky, Erin Cullather, Shirlene Wang, Kristina Hasanaj, Whitney A Morelli, Bonnie Spring, David Cella, Frank Penedo, Ron Ackermann, Kerry S Courneya, Juned Siddique, Julia Frey, Siobhan M Phillips","doi":"10.1093/tbm/ibaf033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most breast cancer survivors (BCS) are insufficiently active. mHealth moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) interventions for BCS are highly scalable, but the feasibility and acceptability of specific intervention components are unknown.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study is to examine the feasibility and acceptability of the Fit2Thrive MVPA promotion intervention components.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using Multiphase Optimization Strategy methodology, inactive BCS [n = 269; Mage = 52.5; (SD ± 9.9)] received a core intervention (Fitbit + Fit2Thrive smartphone app) and were randomly assigned to receive zero to five components for 12 weeks: (i) support calls; (ii) deluxe app; (iii) text messages, (iv) online gym; and (v) Buddy. Feasibility was measured through study accrual, retention, and adherence rates. Acceptability was measured via post-program evaluations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Enrollment rates were high; 419 BCS expressed interest in the study, 348 (83%) passed screening, and 269 (77%) were randomized; 98% (n = 264) received the intervention. Retention was 94% at 12 weeks. Fitbits were worn on 93% of study days. Most reported using the app ≥5 days/week (67%), enjoyed using the Fitbit (79%), and were satisfied with their study experience (88%) and the Fit2Thrive app design (79%). Component adherence rates and acceptability varied by intervention component. Component-specific effects on MVPA goal adherence and overall acceptability ratings were significant for telephone support calls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings indicate Fit2Thrive's feasibility and acceptability were high overall but may vary by component. Future work should refine and test components to maximize participant engagement, efficacy, and scalability.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial information: </strong>The Clinical Trials Registration NCT03131440.</p>","PeriodicalId":48679,"journal":{"name":"Translational Behavioral Medicine","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12342139/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility and acceptability of the Fit2Thrive mHealth physical activity promotion intervention components in breast cancer survivors.\",\"authors\":\"Payton Solk, Jing Song, Jean Reading, Julia Starikovsky, Erin Cullather, Shirlene Wang, Kristina Hasanaj, Whitney A Morelli, Bonnie Spring, David Cella, Frank Penedo, Ron Ackermann, Kerry S Courneya, Juned Siddique, Julia Frey, Siobhan M Phillips\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/tbm/ibaf033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most breast cancer survivors (BCS) are insufficiently active. mHealth moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) interventions for BCS are highly scalable, but the feasibility and acceptability of specific intervention components are unknown.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study is to examine the feasibility and acceptability of the Fit2Thrive MVPA promotion intervention components.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using Multiphase Optimization Strategy methodology, inactive BCS [n = 269; Mage = 52.5; (SD ± 9.9)] received a core intervention (Fitbit + Fit2Thrive smartphone app) and were randomly assigned to receive zero to five components for 12 weeks: (i) support calls; (ii) deluxe app; (iii) text messages, (iv) online gym; and (v) Buddy. Feasibility was measured through study accrual, retention, and adherence rates. Acceptability was measured via post-program evaluations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Enrollment rates were high; 419 BCS expressed interest in the study, 348 (83%) passed screening, and 269 (77%) were randomized; 98% (n = 264) received the intervention. Retention was 94% at 12 weeks. Fitbits were worn on 93% of study days. Most reported using the app ≥5 days/week (67%), enjoyed using the Fitbit (79%), and were satisfied with their study experience (88%) and the Fit2Thrive app design (79%). Component adherence rates and acceptability varied by intervention component. Component-specific effects on MVPA goal adherence and overall acceptability ratings were significant for telephone support calls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings indicate Fit2Thrive's feasibility and acceptability were high overall but may vary by component. Future work should refine and test components to maximize participant engagement, efficacy, and scalability.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial information: </strong>The Clinical Trials Registration NCT03131440.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational Behavioral Medicine\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12342139/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational Behavioral Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibaf033\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibaf033","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:大多数乳腺癌幸存者(BCS)活动不足。移动健康针对BCS的中度至剧烈身体活动(MVPA)干预具有高度可扩展性,但具体干预成分的可行性和可接受性尚不清楚。目的:本研究的目的是检验Fit2Thrive MVPA促进干预成分的可行性和可接受性。方法采用多阶段优化策略方法,选取不活跃BCS [n = 269;法师= 52.5;(SD±9.9)]接受核心干预(Fitbit + Fit2Thrive智能手机应用程序),并被随机分配接受零到五个组件,为期12周:(i)支持电话;(ii)豪华应用程序;(iii)短信;(iv)网上健身;(v)兄弟。可行性通过研究累积率、保留率和依从率来衡量。可接受性是通过项目后评估来衡量的。结果:入学率高;419例BCS表示对研究感兴趣,348例(83%)通过筛选,269例(77%)随机化;98% (n = 264)接受了干预。12周时保留率为94%。93%的学习日佩戴fitbit。大多数报告使用该应用程序≥5天/周(67%),喜欢使用Fitbit(79%),并对他们的学习体验(88%)和Fit2Thrive应用程序设计(79%)感到满意。干预成分的依从率和可接受性因干预成分而异。电话支持呼叫对MVPA目标依从性和总体可接受性评分的组件特定影响是显著的。结论:研究结果表明,Fit2Thrive的可行性和可接受性总体上很高,但可能因组件而异。未来的工作应该改进和测试组件,以最大限度地提高参与者的参与度、效率和可扩展性。临床试验信息:临床试验注册号NCT03131440。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feasibility and acceptability of the Fit2Thrive mHealth physical activity promotion intervention components in breast cancer survivors.

Background: Most breast cancer survivors (BCS) are insufficiently active. mHealth moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) interventions for BCS are highly scalable, but the feasibility and acceptability of specific intervention components are unknown.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to examine the feasibility and acceptability of the Fit2Thrive MVPA promotion intervention components.

Methods: Using Multiphase Optimization Strategy methodology, inactive BCS [n = 269; Mage = 52.5; (SD ± 9.9)] received a core intervention (Fitbit + Fit2Thrive smartphone app) and were randomly assigned to receive zero to five components for 12 weeks: (i) support calls; (ii) deluxe app; (iii) text messages, (iv) online gym; and (v) Buddy. Feasibility was measured through study accrual, retention, and adherence rates. Acceptability was measured via post-program evaluations.

Results: Enrollment rates were high; 419 BCS expressed interest in the study, 348 (83%) passed screening, and 269 (77%) were randomized; 98% (n = 264) received the intervention. Retention was 94% at 12 weeks. Fitbits were worn on 93% of study days. Most reported using the app ≥5 days/week (67%), enjoyed using the Fitbit (79%), and were satisfied with their study experience (88%) and the Fit2Thrive app design (79%). Component adherence rates and acceptability varied by intervention component. Component-specific effects on MVPA goal adherence and overall acceptability ratings were significant for telephone support calls.

Conclusions: Findings indicate Fit2Thrive's feasibility and acceptability were high overall but may vary by component. Future work should refine and test components to maximize participant engagement, efficacy, and scalability.

Clinical trial information: The Clinical Trials Registration NCT03131440.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Translational Behavioral Medicine
Translational Behavioral Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Translational Behavioral Medicine publishes content that engages, informs, and catalyzes dialogue about behavioral medicine among the research, practice, and policy communities. TBM began receiving an Impact Factor in 2015 and currently holds an Impact Factor of 2.989. TBM is one of two journals published by the Society of Behavioral Medicine. The Society of Behavioral Medicine is a multidisciplinary organization of clinicians, educators, and scientists dedicated to promoting the study of the interactions of behavior with biology and the environment, and then applying that knowledge to improve the health and well-being of individuals, families, communities, and populations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信