基于社区的医疗保健人工智能伦理决策方法。

IF 3.4 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
JAMIA Open Pub Date : 2025-08-07 eCollection Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf076
Abdou S Senghor, Tiffani J Bright, Saya Kakim, Keith C Norris, Henry A Antwi, Jasmine K Cooper, C Daniel Mullins, Claudia Baquet
{"title":"基于社区的医疗保健人工智能伦理决策方法。","authors":"Abdou S Senghor, Tiffani J Bright, Saya Kakim, Keith C Norris, Henry A Antwi, Jasmine K Cooper, C Daniel Mullins, Claudia Baquet","doi":"10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming healthcare by improving diagnostics, treatment recommendations, and resource allocation. However, its implementation also raises ethical concerns, particularly regarding biases in AI algorithms trained on inequitable data, which may reinforce health disparities. This article introduces the AI COmmunity-based Ethical Dialogue and DEcision-making (CODE) framework to embed ethical deliberation into AI development, focusing on Electronic Health Records (EHRs).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We propose the AI CODE framework as a structured approach to addressing ethical challenges in AI-driven healthcare and ensuring its implementation supports health equity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The framework outlines 5 steps to advance health equity: (1) Contextual diversity and priority: Ensuring inclusive datasets and that AI reflects the community needs; (2) Sharing ethical propositions: Structured discussions on privacy, bias, and fairness; (3) Dialogic decision-making: Collaboratively with stakeholders to develop AI solutions; (4) Integrating ethical solutions: Applying solutions into AI design to enhance fairness; and (5) Evaluating effectiveness: Continuously monitoring AI to address emerging biases.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We examine the framework's role in mitigating AI biases through structured community engagement and its relevance within evolving healthcare policies. While the framework promotes ethical AI integration in healthcare, it also faces challenges in implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The framework provides practical guidance to ensure AI systems are ethical, community-driven, and aligned with health equity goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":36278,"journal":{"name":"JAMIA Open","volume":"8 4","pages":"ooaf076"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12342142/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A community-based approach to ethical decision-making in artificial intelligence for health care.\",\"authors\":\"Abdou S Senghor, Tiffani J Bright, Saya Kakim, Keith C Norris, Henry A Antwi, Jasmine K Cooper, C Daniel Mullins, Claudia Baquet\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming healthcare by improving diagnostics, treatment recommendations, and resource allocation. However, its implementation also raises ethical concerns, particularly regarding biases in AI algorithms trained on inequitable data, which may reinforce health disparities. This article introduces the AI COmmunity-based Ethical Dialogue and DEcision-making (CODE) framework to embed ethical deliberation into AI development, focusing on Electronic Health Records (EHRs).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We propose the AI CODE framework as a structured approach to addressing ethical challenges in AI-driven healthcare and ensuring its implementation supports health equity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The framework outlines 5 steps to advance health equity: (1) Contextual diversity and priority: Ensuring inclusive datasets and that AI reflects the community needs; (2) Sharing ethical propositions: Structured discussions on privacy, bias, and fairness; (3) Dialogic decision-making: Collaboratively with stakeholders to develop AI solutions; (4) Integrating ethical solutions: Applying solutions into AI design to enhance fairness; and (5) Evaluating effectiveness: Continuously monitoring AI to address emerging biases.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We examine the framework's role in mitigating AI biases through structured community engagement and its relevance within evolving healthcare policies. While the framework promotes ethical AI integration in healthcare, it also faces challenges in implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The framework provides practical guidance to ensure AI systems are ethical, community-driven, and aligned with health equity goals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMIA Open\",\"volume\":\"8 4\",\"pages\":\"ooaf076\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12342142/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMIA Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf076\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMIA Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:人工智能(AI)正在通过改进诊断、治疗建议和资源分配来改变医疗保健。然而,它的实施也引起了伦理问题,特别是关于在不公平数据上训练的人工智能算法的偏见,这可能会加剧健康差距。本文介绍了人工智能社区伦理对话和决策(CODE)框架,将伦理审议嵌入到人工智能开发中,重点是电子健康记录(EHRs)。材料和方法:我们提出AI CODE框架作为解决人工智能驱动的医疗保健中的道德挑战的结构化方法,并确保其实施支持健康公平。结果:该框架概述了促进卫生公平的5个步骤:(1)背景多样性和重点:确保包容性数据集和人工智能反映社区需求;(2)分享伦理命题:关于隐私、偏见和公平的结构化讨论;(3)对话式决策:与利益相关方共同制定人工智能解决方案;(4)整合伦理解决方案:将解决方案应用到AI设计中,增强公平性;(5)评估有效性:持续监测人工智能以解决新出现的偏见。讨论:我们研究了该框架在通过结构化社区参与减轻人工智能偏见方面的作用,以及它在不断发展的医疗保健政策中的相关性。虽然该框架促进了人工智能在医疗保健领域的道德整合,但它在实施方面也面临挑战。结论:该框架为确保人工智能系统符合道德、社区驱动并与卫生公平目标保持一致提供了实用指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A community-based approach to ethical decision-making in artificial intelligence for health care.

Objectives: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming healthcare by improving diagnostics, treatment recommendations, and resource allocation. However, its implementation also raises ethical concerns, particularly regarding biases in AI algorithms trained on inequitable data, which may reinforce health disparities. This article introduces the AI COmmunity-based Ethical Dialogue and DEcision-making (CODE) framework to embed ethical deliberation into AI development, focusing on Electronic Health Records (EHRs).

Materials and methods: We propose the AI CODE framework as a structured approach to addressing ethical challenges in AI-driven healthcare and ensuring its implementation supports health equity.

Results: The framework outlines 5 steps to advance health equity: (1) Contextual diversity and priority: Ensuring inclusive datasets and that AI reflects the community needs; (2) Sharing ethical propositions: Structured discussions on privacy, bias, and fairness; (3) Dialogic decision-making: Collaboratively with stakeholders to develop AI solutions; (4) Integrating ethical solutions: Applying solutions into AI design to enhance fairness; and (5) Evaluating effectiveness: Continuously monitoring AI to address emerging biases.

Discussion: We examine the framework's role in mitigating AI biases through structured community engagement and its relevance within evolving healthcare policies. While the framework promotes ethical AI integration in healthcare, it also faces challenges in implementation.

Conclusion: The framework provides practical guidance to ensure AI systems are ethical, community-driven, and aligned with health equity goals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMIA Open
JAMIA Open Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
102
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信