急诊科男女败血症的表现、干预措施和结局差异

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Joseph O'Brien, Jon W Schrock
{"title":"急诊科男女败血症的表现、干预措施和结局差异","authors":"Joseph O'Brien, Jon W Schrock","doi":"10.5811/westjem.40005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Sepsis is a common presentation to the emergency department (ED) and represents a life-threatening syndrome with high mortality rates. The existing literature has conflicting findings regarding outcomes between sexes. Our goal in this study was to investigate the clinical presentation, interventions, and outcomes based on sex for sepsis in the ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study to identify patients presenting with sepsis to the ED. We employed the Global Collaborative Network from 119 international healthcare organizations in the TriNetX Research Network. Sepsis was defined according to International Classification of Diseases, 10<sup>th</sup> Rev, codes. To evaluate sex differences in sepsis presentation, we collected data on age, comorbidities, sex, vital signs, laboratory values, medications, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation, and mortality at 30 days, 90 days, and one year. We used a 1:1 propensity score matching by age, race, comorbidities, and infection source to identify and balance potential risk factors across the study groups to investigate mortality, interventions, and intensive care unit admission trends. Data abstraction and analysis were conducted in the TriNetX platform.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 920,160 patients were included in this study. The most common infection source for both females and males was respiratory, accounting for 40% and 46.2% of sepsis cases, respectively. After adjusting for urinary tract infection as an infection source, females were less likely to receive piperacillin-tazobactam (21% vs 23.6%; odds ratio [OR] 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75 - 0.77), vancomycin (32.9% vs 36%; OR, 0.87; 95% CI 0.86 - 0.88), and vasopressors (16.5% vs 17.6%; OR, 0.92; 95% CI 0.91 - 0.93). Females had a lower all-cause mortality at 30 days (12.1% vs 13%; OR 0.91; 95% CI 0.90 - 0.92), 90 days (17.1% vs 18.7%; OR 0.91; 95% CI 0.90 - 0.92), and one year (21.5% vs 23.3%; OR 0.90; 95% CI 0.89 - 0.91).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Females demonstrated 10% lower odds of mortality from sepsis at 30 days, 90 days, and one year (absolute difference: 0.9%, 1.6%, 1.8%, respectively). Females were less likely to receive vasopressors, vancomycin, or piperacillin-tazobactam, even after accounting for urinary tract infection as the sepsis source.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"26 4","pages":"880-887"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12342512/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sepsis Presentation, Interventions, and Outcome Differences Among Men and Women in the Emergency Department.\",\"authors\":\"Joseph O'Brien, Jon W Schrock\",\"doi\":\"10.5811/westjem.40005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Sepsis is a common presentation to the emergency department (ED) and represents a life-threatening syndrome with high mortality rates. The existing literature has conflicting findings regarding outcomes between sexes. Our goal in this study was to investigate the clinical presentation, interventions, and outcomes based on sex for sepsis in the ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study to identify patients presenting with sepsis to the ED. We employed the Global Collaborative Network from 119 international healthcare organizations in the TriNetX Research Network. Sepsis was defined according to International Classification of Diseases, 10<sup>th</sup> Rev, codes. To evaluate sex differences in sepsis presentation, we collected data on age, comorbidities, sex, vital signs, laboratory values, medications, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation, and mortality at 30 days, 90 days, and one year. We used a 1:1 propensity score matching by age, race, comorbidities, and infection source to identify and balance potential risk factors across the study groups to investigate mortality, interventions, and intensive care unit admission trends. Data abstraction and analysis were conducted in the TriNetX platform.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 920,160 patients were included in this study. The most common infection source for both females and males was respiratory, accounting for 40% and 46.2% of sepsis cases, respectively. After adjusting for urinary tract infection as an infection source, females were less likely to receive piperacillin-tazobactam (21% vs 23.6%; odds ratio [OR] 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75 - 0.77), vancomycin (32.9% vs 36%; OR, 0.87; 95% CI 0.86 - 0.88), and vasopressors (16.5% vs 17.6%; OR, 0.92; 95% CI 0.91 - 0.93). Females had a lower all-cause mortality at 30 days (12.1% vs 13%; OR 0.91; 95% CI 0.90 - 0.92), 90 days (17.1% vs 18.7%; OR 0.91; 95% CI 0.90 - 0.92), and one year (21.5% vs 23.3%; OR 0.90; 95% CI 0.89 - 0.91).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Females demonstrated 10% lower odds of mortality from sepsis at 30 days, 90 days, and one year (absolute difference: 0.9%, 1.6%, 1.8%, respectively). Females were less likely to receive vasopressors, vancomycin, or piperacillin-tazobactam, even after accounting for urinary tract infection as the sepsis source.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"26 4\",\"pages\":\"880-887\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12342512/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.40005\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.40005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:脓毒症是急诊科(ED)的常见表现,是一种危及生命的综合征,死亡率高。现有文献对两性之间的结果有相互矛盾的发现。本研究的目的是调查急诊脓毒症的临床表现、干预措施和基于性别的结局。方法:我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,以确定急诊脓毒症患者。我们利用TriNetX研究网络中的119个国际医疗保健组织的全球协作网络。脓毒症的定义是根据国际疾病分类,第10版,代码。为了评估脓毒症表现的性别差异,我们收集了年龄、合并症、性别、生命体征、实验室值、药物、重症监护病房(ICU)入院、机械通气和30天、90天和1年死亡率的数据。我们使用按年龄、种族、合并症和感染源匹配的1:1倾向评分来识别和平衡研究组中的潜在危险因素,以调查死亡率、干预措施和重症监护病房入院趋势。在TriNetX平台上进行数据抽象和分析。结果:本研究共纳入920160例患者。女性和男性最常见的感染源均为呼吸道感染,分别占败血症病例的40%和46.2%。在将尿路感染作为感染源进行调整后,女性接受哌拉西林-他唑巴坦的可能性较低(21% vs 23.6%;优势比[OR] 0.76;95%可信区间[CI] 0.75 ~ 0.77),万古霉素(32.9% vs 36%;或者,0.87;95% CI 0.86 - 0.88)和血管加压药物(16.5% vs 17.6%;或者,0.92;95% ci 0.91 - 0.93)。女性在30天的全因死亡率较低(12.1% vs 13%;或0.91;95% CI 0.90 - 0.92), 90天(17.1% vs 18.7%;或0.91;95% CI 0.90 - 0.92), 1年(21.5% vs 23.3%;或0.90;95% ci 0.89 - 0.91)。结论:女性在30天、90天和1年内败血症死亡率低10%(绝对差异分别为0.9%、1.6%和1.8%)。女性服用抗利尿激素、万古霉素或哌拉西林-他唑巴坦的可能性较小,即使在考虑了尿路感染作为败血症来源后也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sepsis Presentation, Interventions, and Outcome Differences Among Men and Women in the Emergency Department.

Objectives: Sepsis is a common presentation to the emergency department (ED) and represents a life-threatening syndrome with high mortality rates. The existing literature has conflicting findings regarding outcomes between sexes. Our goal in this study was to investigate the clinical presentation, interventions, and outcomes based on sex for sepsis in the ED.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study to identify patients presenting with sepsis to the ED. We employed the Global Collaborative Network from 119 international healthcare organizations in the TriNetX Research Network. Sepsis was defined according to International Classification of Diseases, 10th Rev, codes. To evaluate sex differences in sepsis presentation, we collected data on age, comorbidities, sex, vital signs, laboratory values, medications, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation, and mortality at 30 days, 90 days, and one year. We used a 1:1 propensity score matching by age, race, comorbidities, and infection source to identify and balance potential risk factors across the study groups to investigate mortality, interventions, and intensive care unit admission trends. Data abstraction and analysis were conducted in the TriNetX platform.

Results: In total, 920,160 patients were included in this study. The most common infection source for both females and males was respiratory, accounting for 40% and 46.2% of sepsis cases, respectively. After adjusting for urinary tract infection as an infection source, females were less likely to receive piperacillin-tazobactam (21% vs 23.6%; odds ratio [OR] 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75 - 0.77), vancomycin (32.9% vs 36%; OR, 0.87; 95% CI 0.86 - 0.88), and vasopressors (16.5% vs 17.6%; OR, 0.92; 95% CI 0.91 - 0.93). Females had a lower all-cause mortality at 30 days (12.1% vs 13%; OR 0.91; 95% CI 0.90 - 0.92), 90 days (17.1% vs 18.7%; OR 0.91; 95% CI 0.90 - 0.92), and one year (21.5% vs 23.3%; OR 0.90; 95% CI 0.89 - 0.91).

Conclusion: Females demonstrated 10% lower odds of mortality from sepsis at 30 days, 90 days, and one year (absolute difference: 0.9%, 1.6%, 1.8%, respectively). Females were less likely to receive vasopressors, vancomycin, or piperacillin-tazobactam, even after accounting for urinary tract infection as the sepsis source.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
125
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: WestJEM focuses on how the systems and delivery of emergency care affects health, health disparities, and health outcomes in communities and populations worldwide, including the impact of social conditions on the composition of patients seeking care in emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信