急诊医师工作负荷的时间动态分析。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Scott Odorizzi, Jessica Hogan, Sabrain Idris, Loraina Marzano, Veronique Rowley, Max Yan, Yuxin Zhang, Jeffrey J Perry
{"title":"急诊医师工作负荷的时间动态分析。","authors":"Scott Odorizzi, Jessica Hogan, Sabrain Idris, Loraina Marzano, Veronique Rowley, Max Yan, Yuxin Zhang, Jeffrey J Perry","doi":"10.5811/westjem.41536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Predictors of Workload in the Emergency Room (POWER) study, published in 2009 using data from 2003, examined the workload of emergency physicians using the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) as a surrogate marker. Many hospitals use a case-mix formula incorporating annual census and POWER's study data to determine staffing levels. However, significant changes in emergency medicine have occurred since its publication, including the implementation of electronic health record systems, increased patient complexity, real-time dictation software, and human health resource challenges due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In this study we aimed to quantify the time required to perform tasks during the care of ambulatory emergency department (ED) patients. Our secondary objective was to stratify these times based on CTAS and clinician factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective observational time-motion study in the urgent care section of a tertiary-care, academic ED with 90,000 visits annually, 70% of which are ambulatory. Research assistants shadowed physicians on two 8-hour shifts daily (8 am-12 am) from July 12-August 14, 2022, tracking the time taken by physicians to perform tasks. We calculated aggregate task times per patient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed 1,204 patient encounters over 65 shifts by 37 unique physicians. The mean treatment time was 21.6 minutes (95% confidence interval [CI] 19.9 - 23.3) for ambulatory CTAS 2 patients; 22.5 minutes (95% CI 21.2 - 23.6) for CTAS 3 patients; 19.7 minutes (95% CI 17.9 - 21.6) for CTAS 4 patients; and 17.4 minutes (95% CI 14.9 - 19.9) for CTAS 5 patients. Compared to the previous 2003 POWER study data, CTAS 4 and 5 patient assessment times took 31% and 58% longer, respectively. Total assessment time by CTAS was statistically significant only comparing CTAS 5 patients to all others (P = .02). Physicians who dictated their charts spent 34% less time (2.1 minutes per patient) charting than those who typed them.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The average time to see an ambulatory ED patient was 21.7 minutes. Low-acuity urgent care patients take longer to assess now than 20 years ago. The CTAS alone is a poor marker of workload for ambulatory patients, necessitating a reassessment of staffing and compensation formulas.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"26 4","pages":"804-809"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12342401/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time Motion Analysis of Emergency Physician Workload in Urgent Care Settings.\",\"authors\":\"Scott Odorizzi, Jessica Hogan, Sabrain Idris, Loraina Marzano, Veronique Rowley, Max Yan, Yuxin Zhang, Jeffrey J Perry\",\"doi\":\"10.5811/westjem.41536\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Predictors of Workload in the Emergency Room (POWER) study, published in 2009 using data from 2003, examined the workload of emergency physicians using the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) as a surrogate marker. Many hospitals use a case-mix formula incorporating annual census and POWER's study data to determine staffing levels. However, significant changes in emergency medicine have occurred since its publication, including the implementation of electronic health record systems, increased patient complexity, real-time dictation software, and human health resource challenges due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In this study we aimed to quantify the time required to perform tasks during the care of ambulatory emergency department (ED) patients. Our secondary objective was to stratify these times based on CTAS and clinician factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective observational time-motion study in the urgent care section of a tertiary-care, academic ED with 90,000 visits annually, 70% of which are ambulatory. Research assistants shadowed physicians on two 8-hour shifts daily (8 am-12 am) from July 12-August 14, 2022, tracking the time taken by physicians to perform tasks. We calculated aggregate task times per patient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed 1,204 patient encounters over 65 shifts by 37 unique physicians. The mean treatment time was 21.6 minutes (95% confidence interval [CI] 19.9 - 23.3) for ambulatory CTAS 2 patients; 22.5 minutes (95% CI 21.2 - 23.6) for CTAS 3 patients; 19.7 minutes (95% CI 17.9 - 21.6) for CTAS 4 patients; and 17.4 minutes (95% CI 14.9 - 19.9) for CTAS 5 patients. Compared to the previous 2003 POWER study data, CTAS 4 and 5 patient assessment times took 31% and 58% longer, respectively. Total assessment time by CTAS was statistically significant only comparing CTAS 5 patients to all others (P = .02). Physicians who dictated their charts spent 34% less time (2.1 minutes per patient) charting than those who typed them.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The average time to see an ambulatory ED patient was 21.7 minutes. Low-acuity urgent care patients take longer to assess now than 20 years ago. The CTAS alone is a poor marker of workload for ambulatory patients, necessitating a reassessment of staffing and compensation formulas.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"26 4\",\"pages\":\"804-809\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12342401/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.41536\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.41536","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:2009年发表的《急诊室工作量预测因子》(POWER)研究使用2003年的数据,使用加拿大分诊和敏度度量表(CTAS)作为替代指标,研究了急诊医生的工作量。许多医院使用结合年度人口普查和POWER研究数据的病例混合公式来确定人员配备水平。然而,自其出版以来,急诊医学发生了重大变化,包括电子病历系统的实施、患者复杂性的增加、实时听写软件以及COVID-19大流行带来的人力卫生资源挑战。在这项研究中,我们旨在量化在门诊急诊科(ED)患者护理期间执行任务所需的时间。我们的第二个目标是根据CTAS和临床医生因素对这些时间进行分层。方法:我们对一家每年有9万人次就诊的三级专科急诊科进行了前瞻性观察时间运动研究,其中70%是门诊。从2022年7月12日至8月14日,研究助理跟随医生每天8小时轮班(上午8点至12点),跟踪医生完成任务所需的时间。我们计算了每位患者的总任务时间。结果:我们观察到37位独特的医生在65个班次中遇到1204名患者。非住院CTAS 2型患者的平均治疗时间为21.6分钟(95%可信区间[CI] 19.9 - 23.3);CTAS 3型患者22.5分钟(95% CI 21.2 - 23.6);CTAS 4期患者19.7分钟(95% CI 17.9 - 21.6);CTAS 5级患者为17.4分钟(95% CI 14.9 - 19.9)。与2003年之前的POWER研究数据相比,CTAS 4和CTAS 5患者评估时间分别延长了31%和58%。CTAS总评估时间仅比较CTAS 5患者与其他所有患者具有统计学意义(P = 0.02)。听写病历的医生比打字的医生少花34%的时间(每个病人2.1分钟)。结论:门诊急诊患者平均就诊时间为21.7分钟。与20年前相比,低视力急诊患者现在需要更长的时间来评估。单独的CTAS不能很好地反映门诊病人的工作量,因此需要重新评估人员配置和补偿公式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Time Motion Analysis of Emergency Physician Workload in Urgent Care Settings.

Introduction: The Predictors of Workload in the Emergency Room (POWER) study, published in 2009 using data from 2003, examined the workload of emergency physicians using the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) as a surrogate marker. Many hospitals use a case-mix formula incorporating annual census and POWER's study data to determine staffing levels. However, significant changes in emergency medicine have occurred since its publication, including the implementation of electronic health record systems, increased patient complexity, real-time dictation software, and human health resource challenges due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In this study we aimed to quantify the time required to perform tasks during the care of ambulatory emergency department (ED) patients. Our secondary objective was to stratify these times based on CTAS and clinician factors.

Methods: We conducted a prospective observational time-motion study in the urgent care section of a tertiary-care, academic ED with 90,000 visits annually, 70% of which are ambulatory. Research assistants shadowed physicians on two 8-hour shifts daily (8 am-12 am) from July 12-August 14, 2022, tracking the time taken by physicians to perform tasks. We calculated aggregate task times per patient.

Results: We observed 1,204 patient encounters over 65 shifts by 37 unique physicians. The mean treatment time was 21.6 minutes (95% confidence interval [CI] 19.9 - 23.3) for ambulatory CTAS 2 patients; 22.5 minutes (95% CI 21.2 - 23.6) for CTAS 3 patients; 19.7 minutes (95% CI 17.9 - 21.6) for CTAS 4 patients; and 17.4 minutes (95% CI 14.9 - 19.9) for CTAS 5 patients. Compared to the previous 2003 POWER study data, CTAS 4 and 5 patient assessment times took 31% and 58% longer, respectively. Total assessment time by CTAS was statistically significant only comparing CTAS 5 patients to all others (P = .02). Physicians who dictated their charts spent 34% less time (2.1 minutes per patient) charting than those who typed them.

Conclusion: The average time to see an ambulatory ED patient was 21.7 minutes. Low-acuity urgent care patients take longer to assess now than 20 years ago. The CTAS alone is a poor marker of workload for ambulatory patients, necessitating a reassessment of staffing and compensation formulas.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
125
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: WestJEM focuses on how the systems and delivery of emergency care affects health, health disparities, and health outcomes in communities and populations worldwide, including the impact of social conditions on the composition of patients seeking care in emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信