使用医疗保健连接计划减少低敏锐度患者的急诊重复就诊。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Mitchell Hoyer, Kimberly A Stanford, Ernestina Perez, Rachel Nordgren, Laura Markin, Melanie Francia, Zain Abid, Marika Kachman, Brenda Battle, Thomas Spiegel
{"title":"使用医疗保健连接计划减少低敏锐度患者的急诊重复就诊。","authors":"Mitchell Hoyer, Kimberly A Stanford, Ernestina Perez, Rachel Nordgren, Laura Markin, Melanie Francia, Zain Abid, Marika Kachman, Brenda Battle, Thomas Spiegel","doi":"10.5811/westjem.25357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency department (ED) utilization for non-emergent issues has been a longstanding issue in the United States, especially in service areas with high Medicaid enrollment. The Medical Home and Specialty Care Connection Program (MHSCC) at University of Chicago Medicine (UCM) supports patients recently seen in the ED with follow-up care by assisting patients with follow-up appointments, establishing a medical \"home\" and providing education on primary care utilization via working with a patient advocate. These types of programs have inconsistent results throughout the literature and a dearth of study periods. We conducted a program evaluation to assess the association of the MHSCC in reducing low-acuity ED utilization for program patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This program evaluation used retrospective data from the MHSCC program dataset from 2012-2020 and matched with electronic health records of low-acuity ED visits at UCM ED from 2010-2022 for each patient. Pre- and post-low-acuity ED visit rates were calculated based on the patients first program enrollment and compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total 5,482 ED patients enrolled in the program were included in the sample, 537 of whom were enrolled more than once. These patients had 41,530 low-acuity ED visits. The rate of low-acuity ED visits after the program enrollment was significantly lower than before with a mean of 2.5 visits per year before program intervention to 1.38 after, a 45% decrease (P<.0001). This resulted in an estimated 9,487 fewer low acuity ED visits over nine years. Patients with multiple enrollments (up to four) further resulted in a slightly lower ED visit rates. Patients who benefitted the most in both proportion and mean analyses were of low acuity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found a significant reduction in program patient's ED visit rates for low-acuity needs. Further evaluation on the outcomes of the program, mechanisms of physician referrals and attributes of the patient population are recommended to understand what drives these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"26 4","pages":"853-862"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12342400/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reducing Repeat Emergency Department Visits for Low-Acuity Patients Using a Healthcare Connection Program.\",\"authors\":\"Mitchell Hoyer, Kimberly A Stanford, Ernestina Perez, Rachel Nordgren, Laura Markin, Melanie Francia, Zain Abid, Marika Kachman, Brenda Battle, Thomas Spiegel\",\"doi\":\"10.5811/westjem.25357\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency department (ED) utilization for non-emergent issues has been a longstanding issue in the United States, especially in service areas with high Medicaid enrollment. The Medical Home and Specialty Care Connection Program (MHSCC) at University of Chicago Medicine (UCM) supports patients recently seen in the ED with follow-up care by assisting patients with follow-up appointments, establishing a medical \\\"home\\\" and providing education on primary care utilization via working with a patient advocate. These types of programs have inconsistent results throughout the literature and a dearth of study periods. We conducted a program evaluation to assess the association of the MHSCC in reducing low-acuity ED utilization for program patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This program evaluation used retrospective data from the MHSCC program dataset from 2012-2020 and matched with electronic health records of low-acuity ED visits at UCM ED from 2010-2022 for each patient. Pre- and post-low-acuity ED visit rates were calculated based on the patients first program enrollment and compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total 5,482 ED patients enrolled in the program were included in the sample, 537 of whom were enrolled more than once. These patients had 41,530 low-acuity ED visits. The rate of low-acuity ED visits after the program enrollment was significantly lower than before with a mean of 2.5 visits per year before program intervention to 1.38 after, a 45% decrease (P<.0001). This resulted in an estimated 9,487 fewer low acuity ED visits over nine years. Patients with multiple enrollments (up to four) further resulted in a slightly lower ED visit rates. Patients who benefitted the most in both proportion and mean analyses were of low acuity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found a significant reduction in program patient's ED visit rates for low-acuity needs. Further evaluation on the outcomes of the program, mechanisms of physician referrals and attributes of the patient population are recommended to understand what drives these findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"26 4\",\"pages\":\"853-862\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12342400/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.25357\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.25357","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在美国,急诊部门(ED)对非紧急问题的利用一直是一个长期存在的问题,特别是在医疗补助登记率高的服务领域。芝加哥大学医学院(UCM)的医疗之家和专业护理连接项目(MHSCC)通过协助患者进行随访预约、建立医疗“之家”以及通过与患者倡导者合作,提供有关初级保健利用的教育,为近期在急诊科就诊的患者提供后续护理。这些类型的项目在整个文献中都有不一致的结果,而且缺乏研究时期。我们进行了一项项目评估,以评估MHSCC在降低项目患者低度数ED使用率方面的关系。方法:本项目评估使用MHSCC项目数据集2012-2020年的回顾性数据,并与每位患者2010-2022年在UCM急诊科低视力急诊科就诊的电子健康记录相匹配。根据患者首次入组,计算低度数急诊科就诊前和就诊后的就诊率,并使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验进行比较。结果:共有5482例ED患者纳入该项目,其中537例患者不止一次入选。这些患者有41,530次低视力急诊科就诊。低视力急诊科就诊率在项目入组后显著低于项目干预前,平均每年2.5次就诊到项目干预后的1.38次,下降了45%(结论:我们发现项目患者因低视力需求而就诊的急诊科就诊率显著降低。建议对项目的结果、医生转诊的机制和患者群体的属性进行进一步评估,以了解驱动这些发现的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reducing Repeat Emergency Department Visits for Low-Acuity Patients Using a Healthcare Connection Program.

Background: Emergency department (ED) utilization for non-emergent issues has been a longstanding issue in the United States, especially in service areas with high Medicaid enrollment. The Medical Home and Specialty Care Connection Program (MHSCC) at University of Chicago Medicine (UCM) supports patients recently seen in the ED with follow-up care by assisting patients with follow-up appointments, establishing a medical "home" and providing education on primary care utilization via working with a patient advocate. These types of programs have inconsistent results throughout the literature and a dearth of study periods. We conducted a program evaluation to assess the association of the MHSCC in reducing low-acuity ED utilization for program patients.

Methods: This program evaluation used retrospective data from the MHSCC program dataset from 2012-2020 and matched with electronic health records of low-acuity ED visits at UCM ED from 2010-2022 for each patient. Pre- and post-low-acuity ED visit rates were calculated based on the patients first program enrollment and compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

Results: In total 5,482 ED patients enrolled in the program were included in the sample, 537 of whom were enrolled more than once. These patients had 41,530 low-acuity ED visits. The rate of low-acuity ED visits after the program enrollment was significantly lower than before with a mean of 2.5 visits per year before program intervention to 1.38 after, a 45% decrease (P<.0001). This resulted in an estimated 9,487 fewer low acuity ED visits over nine years. Patients with multiple enrollments (up to four) further resulted in a slightly lower ED visit rates. Patients who benefitted the most in both proportion and mean analyses were of low acuity.

Conclusion: We found a significant reduction in program patient's ED visit rates for low-acuity needs. Further evaluation on the outcomes of the program, mechanisms of physician referrals and attributes of the patient population are recommended to understand what drives these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
125
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: WestJEM focuses on how the systems and delivery of emergency care affects health, health disparities, and health outcomes in communities and populations worldwide, including the impact of social conditions on the composition of patients seeking care in emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信