急诊科瞳孔测量:预测病人情绪的工具。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Hector Gonzalez, Yanying Chen, Newton Addo, Debbie Y Madhok
{"title":"急诊科瞳孔测量:预测病人情绪的工具。","authors":"Hector Gonzalez, Yanying Chen, Newton Addo, Debbie Y Madhok","doi":"10.5811/westjem.39912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The ability to accurately assess and predict the disposition of comatose patients from within the emergency department (ED) remains a critical challenge. Traditional methods lack precision and consistency. Our goal was to evaluate the prognostic capability of the neurological pupil index (NPI) in predicting patient disposition from within the ED.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This prospective observational study followed 50 comatose patients (Glasgow Coma Scale [GSC] score < 9) who were enrolled via convenience sampling and subsequently treated in the ED at a Level 1 trauma center and public safety-net hospital in San Francisco, CA. We calculated NPI scores and collected data on patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes. The NPI scores were categorized into three groups: 0 (very poor); 0.1-3.0 (poor to moderate); and 3.1-5.0 (good). We used ANOVA, the Pearson chi-squared test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and Fisher exact test to assess the association between NPI scores and discharge status. Results were reported as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals, with a P-value < .05 considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age of patients in this study was 58 years (IQR 42-74), and 66% were male. Higher NPI scores (five-point scale with 3.1-5.0 considered normal) were significantly associated with an increased likelihood of ED discharge (82%), , while lower NPI scores (0, nonreactive pupil) were predominantly associated with hospital admission (92%) (P < .001). Significant predictors of discharge status included patient age, GCS scores, and coma etiology.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the utility of the NPI in predicting patient disposition from within the ED. Higher NPI scores were strongly associated with an increased likelihood of ED discharge. These findings support the idea that NPI has the potential to enhance the accuracy of prognostic assessments, in comparison to subjective characterizations of pupil activity. Additional research with larger, multicenter cohorts are needed to confirm these results and establish standardized protocols for integration of NPI in ED workflow.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"26 4","pages":"1078-1085"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12342529/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pupillometry in the Emergency Department: A Tool for Predicting Patient Disposition.\",\"authors\":\"Hector Gonzalez, Yanying Chen, Newton Addo, Debbie Y Madhok\",\"doi\":\"10.5811/westjem.39912\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The ability to accurately assess and predict the disposition of comatose patients from within the emergency department (ED) remains a critical challenge. Traditional methods lack precision and consistency. Our goal was to evaluate the prognostic capability of the neurological pupil index (NPI) in predicting patient disposition from within the ED.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This prospective observational study followed 50 comatose patients (Glasgow Coma Scale [GSC] score < 9) who were enrolled via convenience sampling and subsequently treated in the ED at a Level 1 trauma center and public safety-net hospital in San Francisco, CA. We calculated NPI scores and collected data on patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes. The NPI scores were categorized into three groups: 0 (very poor); 0.1-3.0 (poor to moderate); and 3.1-5.0 (good). We used ANOVA, the Pearson chi-squared test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and Fisher exact test to assess the association between NPI scores and discharge status. Results were reported as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals, with a P-value < .05 considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age of patients in this study was 58 years (IQR 42-74), and 66% were male. Higher NPI scores (five-point scale with 3.1-5.0 considered normal) were significantly associated with an increased likelihood of ED discharge (82%), , while lower NPI scores (0, nonreactive pupil) were predominantly associated with hospital admission (92%) (P < .001). Significant predictors of discharge status included patient age, GCS scores, and coma etiology.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the utility of the NPI in predicting patient disposition from within the ED. Higher NPI scores were strongly associated with an increased likelihood of ED discharge. These findings support the idea that NPI has the potential to enhance the accuracy of prognostic assessments, in comparison to subjective characterizations of pupil activity. Additional research with larger, multicenter cohorts are needed to confirm these results and establish standardized protocols for integration of NPI in ED workflow.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"26 4\",\"pages\":\"1078-1085\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12342529/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.39912\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.39912","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在急诊科(ED)内准确评估和预测昏迷患者处置的能力仍然是一个关键的挑战。传统方法缺乏精确性和一致性。我们的目标是评估神经瞳孔指数(NPI)在ed内预测患者倾向的预后能力。这项前瞻性观察性研究随访了50名昏迷患者(格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分< 9),这些患者通过方便抽样入组,随后在旧金山一级创伤中心和公共安全网医院的急诊科接受治疗。我们计算了NPI评分,并收集了患者人口统计学、临床特征和结局的数据。NPI得分分为三组:0(非常差);0.1-3.0(差至中等);3.1-5.0(良好)。我们使用方差分析、Pearson卡方检验、Wilcoxon秩和检验和Fisher精确检验来评估NPI评分与出院状况之间的关系。结果以95%置信区间的优势比报告,p值< 0.05认为具有统计学意义。结果:本研究患者中位年龄为58岁(IQR 42-74), 66%为男性。较高的NPI评分(5分制,3.1-5.0视为正常)与ED出院的可能性增加显著相关(82%),而较低的NPI评分(0,无反应瞳孔)与住院的可能性主要相关(92%)(P < 0.001)。出院状态的重要预测因素包括患者年龄、GCS评分和昏迷病因。结论:本研究强调了NPI在预测急诊科患者倾向方面的效用。较高的NPI评分与急诊科出院的可能性增加密切相关。这些发现支持了这样一种观点,即与瞳孔活动的主观特征相比,NPI有可能提高预后评估的准确性。需要对更大的、多中心的队列进行进一步的研究来证实这些结果,并建立将新产品导入ED工作流程的标准化协议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pupillometry in the Emergency Department: A Tool for Predicting Patient Disposition.

Introduction: The ability to accurately assess and predict the disposition of comatose patients from within the emergency department (ED) remains a critical challenge. Traditional methods lack precision and consistency. Our goal was to evaluate the prognostic capability of the neurological pupil index (NPI) in predicting patient disposition from within the ED.

Method: This prospective observational study followed 50 comatose patients (Glasgow Coma Scale [GSC] score < 9) who were enrolled via convenience sampling and subsequently treated in the ED at a Level 1 trauma center and public safety-net hospital in San Francisco, CA. We calculated NPI scores and collected data on patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes. The NPI scores were categorized into three groups: 0 (very poor); 0.1-3.0 (poor to moderate); and 3.1-5.0 (good). We used ANOVA, the Pearson chi-squared test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and Fisher exact test to assess the association between NPI scores and discharge status. Results were reported as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals, with a P-value < .05 considered statistically significant.

Results: The median age of patients in this study was 58 years (IQR 42-74), and 66% were male. Higher NPI scores (five-point scale with 3.1-5.0 considered normal) were significantly associated with an increased likelihood of ED discharge (82%), , while lower NPI scores (0, nonreactive pupil) were predominantly associated with hospital admission (92%) (P < .001). Significant predictors of discharge status included patient age, GCS scores, and coma etiology.

Conclusion: This study highlights the utility of the NPI in predicting patient disposition from within the ED. Higher NPI scores were strongly associated with an increased likelihood of ED discharge. These findings support the idea that NPI has the potential to enhance the accuracy of prognostic assessments, in comparison to subjective characterizations of pupil activity. Additional research with larger, multicenter cohorts are needed to confirm these results and establish standardized protocols for integration of NPI in ED workflow.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
125
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: WestJEM focuses on how the systems and delivery of emergency care affects health, health disparities, and health outcomes in communities and populations worldwide, including the impact of social conditions on the composition of patients seeking care in emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信