急诊科姑息治疗的改善结果和成本:病例对照研究

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Brandon Chalfin, Spencer M Salazar, Regina Laico, Susan Hughes, Patrick J Macmillan
{"title":"急诊科姑息治疗的改善结果和成本:病例对照研究","authors":"Brandon Chalfin, Spencer M Salazar, Regina Laico, Susan Hughes, Patrick J Macmillan","doi":"10.5811/westjem.35388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Palliative care consultation teams provide significant advantages for patients, healthcare professionals, and hospitals, particularly in pain management, family support, and clinician satisfaction. Numerous studies show that inpatient palliative care services yield benefits regardless of the timing of initiation, contributing to shortened hospital stays and cost savings. Recent studies have focused on the timing and setting of palliative care, especially in emergency departments (ED), highlighting improved patient outcomes when initiated early. This study explores the potential of embedding hybrid physicians (double-boarded physicians in palliative and emergency medicine) in the ED to further enhance patient care and reduce hospital resources.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This small pilot case-control study included a subset of all patients referred by emergency physicians and hospitalists for palliative care within 24 hours of registration, physically present in the ED. Cases consisted of all the patients seen by hybrid physicians embedded in the ED. Matched controls were seen by palliative care-boarded clinicians (various other primary specialties) during palliative care rounds in the hospital. Matches were based on diagnosis, comorbidities, and referral date. Outcomes measured included hospital length of stay, total charges, discharge disposition, code status changes, and ED visits not resulting in admission. Statistical analyses used chi-square tests for categorical data and Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a four-year period, 68 cases were attended by hybrid physicians over 57 disparate days. These cases had significantly shorter hospital stays (median 2.1 days) compared to controls (6.5 days, P<.001). Total charges were also lower for cases ($37,800) than for controls ($78,000, P<.001). A notable secondary outcome was that 26.5% of ED visits in the case group did not result in hospital admission, compared to all controls being admitted (P<.001). In addition, more cases than controls had a code status of comfort care at discharge (P=.07) CONCLUSION: Embedding hybrid physicians in the ED significantly shortened hospital stays and reduced charges for seriously ill patients. These findings support the further exploration of integrating such physicians into ED settings to enhance patient care and optimize hospital resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"26 4","pages":"1040-1046"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12342544/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improved Outcomes and Cost with Palliative Care in the Emergency Department: Case-Control Study.\",\"authors\":\"Brandon Chalfin, Spencer M Salazar, Regina Laico, Susan Hughes, Patrick J Macmillan\",\"doi\":\"10.5811/westjem.35388\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Palliative care consultation teams provide significant advantages for patients, healthcare professionals, and hospitals, particularly in pain management, family support, and clinician satisfaction. Numerous studies show that inpatient palliative care services yield benefits regardless of the timing of initiation, contributing to shortened hospital stays and cost savings. Recent studies have focused on the timing and setting of palliative care, especially in emergency departments (ED), highlighting improved patient outcomes when initiated early. This study explores the potential of embedding hybrid physicians (double-boarded physicians in palliative and emergency medicine) in the ED to further enhance patient care and reduce hospital resources.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This small pilot case-control study included a subset of all patients referred by emergency physicians and hospitalists for palliative care within 24 hours of registration, physically present in the ED. Cases consisted of all the patients seen by hybrid physicians embedded in the ED. Matched controls were seen by palliative care-boarded clinicians (various other primary specialties) during palliative care rounds in the hospital. Matches were based on diagnosis, comorbidities, and referral date. Outcomes measured included hospital length of stay, total charges, discharge disposition, code status changes, and ED visits not resulting in admission. Statistical analyses used chi-square tests for categorical data and Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a four-year period, 68 cases were attended by hybrid physicians over 57 disparate days. These cases had significantly shorter hospital stays (median 2.1 days) compared to controls (6.5 days, P<.001). Total charges were also lower for cases ($37,800) than for controls ($78,000, P<.001). A notable secondary outcome was that 26.5% of ED visits in the case group did not result in hospital admission, compared to all controls being admitted (P<.001). In addition, more cases than controls had a code status of comfort care at discharge (P=.07) CONCLUSION: Embedding hybrid physicians in the ED significantly shortened hospital stays and reduced charges for seriously ill patients. These findings support the further exploration of integrating such physicians into ED settings to enhance patient care and optimize hospital resources.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"26 4\",\"pages\":\"1040-1046\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12342544/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.35388\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.35388","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

姑息治疗咨询团队为患者、医疗保健专业人员和医院提供了显著的优势,特别是在疼痛管理、家庭支持和临床医生满意度方面。大量研究表明,住院姑息治疗服务无论何时开始都能带来好处,有助于缩短住院时间和节省成本。最近的研究集中在姑息治疗的时机和设置上,特别是在急诊科(ED),强调早期开始可以改善患者的预后。本研究探讨了在急诊科嵌入混合医生(姑息医学和急诊医学的双重医生)的潜力,以进一步提高患者护理和减少医院资源。方法:这项小型试点病例对照研究包括了登记后24小时内急诊医生和住院医生转诊的所有患者,这些患者在急诊科就诊。病例包括急诊科的混合医生所见的所有患者。匹配的对照组是在医院的姑息治疗查房期间由姑息治疗的临床医生(各种其他初级专科)所见。匹配基于诊断、合并症和转诊日期。测量的结果包括住院时间、总费用、出院处置、代码状态变化和未入院的急诊科就诊。统计分析对分类资料采用卡方检验,对连续资料采用Wilcoxon秩和检验。结果:在四年的时间里,68例由混合医生在57天不同的时间内就诊。与对照组(6.5天)相比,这些病例的住院时间明显缩短(中位2.1天)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improved Outcomes and Cost with Palliative Care in the Emergency Department: Case-Control Study.

Introduction: Palliative care consultation teams provide significant advantages for patients, healthcare professionals, and hospitals, particularly in pain management, family support, and clinician satisfaction. Numerous studies show that inpatient palliative care services yield benefits regardless of the timing of initiation, contributing to shortened hospital stays and cost savings. Recent studies have focused on the timing and setting of palliative care, especially in emergency departments (ED), highlighting improved patient outcomes when initiated early. This study explores the potential of embedding hybrid physicians (double-boarded physicians in palliative and emergency medicine) in the ED to further enhance patient care and reduce hospital resources.

Methods: This small pilot case-control study included a subset of all patients referred by emergency physicians and hospitalists for palliative care within 24 hours of registration, physically present in the ED. Cases consisted of all the patients seen by hybrid physicians embedded in the ED. Matched controls were seen by palliative care-boarded clinicians (various other primary specialties) during palliative care rounds in the hospital. Matches were based on diagnosis, comorbidities, and referral date. Outcomes measured included hospital length of stay, total charges, discharge disposition, code status changes, and ED visits not resulting in admission. Statistical analyses used chi-square tests for categorical data and Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous data.

Results: In a four-year period, 68 cases were attended by hybrid physicians over 57 disparate days. These cases had significantly shorter hospital stays (median 2.1 days) compared to controls (6.5 days, P<.001). Total charges were also lower for cases ($37,800) than for controls ($78,000, P<.001). A notable secondary outcome was that 26.5% of ED visits in the case group did not result in hospital admission, compared to all controls being admitted (P<.001). In addition, more cases than controls had a code status of comfort care at discharge (P=.07) CONCLUSION: Embedding hybrid physicians in the ED significantly shortened hospital stays and reduced charges for seriously ill patients. These findings support the further exploration of integrating such physicians into ED settings to enhance patient care and optimize hospital resources.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
125
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: WestJEM focuses on how the systems and delivery of emergency care affects health, health disparities, and health outcomes in communities and populations worldwide, including the impact of social conditions on the composition of patients seeking care in emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信