COVID-19对急诊科非英语首选语言患者的影响

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Molly Thiessen, Emily Hopkins, Jennifer Whitfield, Kristine Rodrigues, David Richards, Leah Warner, Jason Haukoos
{"title":"COVID-19对急诊科非英语首选语言患者的影响","authors":"Molly Thiessen, Emily Hopkins, Jennifer Whitfield, Kristine Rodrigues, David Richards, Leah Warner, Jason Haukoos","doi":"10.5811/westjem.18610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic had a disproportionate impact on minority communities, including patients who identify as having a preferred language other than English (PLOE). Our primary goal in this study was to evaluate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with a PLOE in the emergency department (ED), and the use of interpreter services. Secondary outcomes evaluated were measures of patient care, including length of stay, number of studies performed, and unplanned return visits to the ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed an interrupted time series study of prospectively collected electronic health record (EHR) adult ED and language services data from an urban, safety-net hospital.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total number of patients presenting to the ED went down in the early peak of the pandemic; however, the percentage of patients with a PLOE went up compared with previous years (19% vs 16%) and, despite making up only 19% of total patients, comprised 44% of total COVID-19 positive patients. In-person interpreter use decreased (prevalence ratio 0.49, 95% confidence Interval [CI] 0.43-0.56) while telephonic and video interpretation increased (prevalence ratio 3.97, 95% CI 3.56-4.43). Baseline testing was unchanged. All groups experienced a decrease in median LOS in 2020, but this was only found to be significant for patients who speak a language other than English or Spanish (P<0.001). None of the patient groups experienced a significant increase in unscheduled returns in 2020.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data confirms that COVID-19 disproportionately affected patients with a PLOE, with patients with a PLOE 2.9 times more likely to test positive for COVID-19 than their English-speaking counterparts. Efforts should be made to mitigate this effect via language-concordant care, professional interpreters, and culturally appropriate interaction and information dissemination, not only as it relates to planning for public health crises, but in the day-to-day function of the healthcare system at large. Continued research into the factors driving these inequities and ways to mitigate them is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"26 4","pages":"960-969"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12342450/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of COVID-19 on Patients with a Preferred Language Other than English in the Emergency Department.\",\"authors\":\"Molly Thiessen, Emily Hopkins, Jennifer Whitfield, Kristine Rodrigues, David Richards, Leah Warner, Jason Haukoos\",\"doi\":\"10.5811/westjem.18610\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic had a disproportionate impact on minority communities, including patients who identify as having a preferred language other than English (PLOE). Our primary goal in this study was to evaluate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with a PLOE in the emergency department (ED), and the use of interpreter services. Secondary outcomes evaluated were measures of patient care, including length of stay, number of studies performed, and unplanned return visits to the ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed an interrupted time series study of prospectively collected electronic health record (EHR) adult ED and language services data from an urban, safety-net hospital.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total number of patients presenting to the ED went down in the early peak of the pandemic; however, the percentage of patients with a PLOE went up compared with previous years (19% vs 16%) and, despite making up only 19% of total patients, comprised 44% of total COVID-19 positive patients. In-person interpreter use decreased (prevalence ratio 0.49, 95% confidence Interval [CI] 0.43-0.56) while telephonic and video interpretation increased (prevalence ratio 3.97, 95% CI 3.56-4.43). Baseline testing was unchanged. All groups experienced a decrease in median LOS in 2020, but this was only found to be significant for patients who speak a language other than English or Spanish (P<0.001). None of the patient groups experienced a significant increase in unscheduled returns in 2020.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data confirms that COVID-19 disproportionately affected patients with a PLOE, with patients with a PLOE 2.9 times more likely to test positive for COVID-19 than their English-speaking counterparts. Efforts should be made to mitigate this effect via language-concordant care, professional interpreters, and culturally appropriate interaction and information dissemination, not only as it relates to planning for public health crises, but in the day-to-day function of the healthcare system at large. Continued research into the factors driving these inequities and ways to mitigate them is warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"26 4\",\"pages\":\"960-969\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12342450/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.18610\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.18610","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2019冠状病毒病大流行对少数民族社区产生了不成比例的影响,包括那些认为自己喜欢英语以外的其他语言(PLOE)的患者。本研究的主要目的是评估COVID-19大流行对急诊科(ED) PLOE患者的影响,以及翻译服务的使用。评估的次要结果是患者护理措施,包括住院时间、进行的研究数量和计划外的ED回访。方法:我们对前瞻性收集的电子健康记录(EHR)成人ED和来自城市安全网医院的语言服务数据进行了中断时间序列研究。结果:在疫情高峰期早期,急诊科就诊总人数呈下降趋势;然而,与前几年相比,PLOE患者的百分比有所上升(19%对16%),尽管仅占总患者的19%,但占COVID-19阳性患者总数的44%。现场口译的使用减少了(患病率为0.49,95%可信区间[CI] 0.43-0.56),而电话和视频口译的使用增加了(患病率为3.97,95% CI为3.56-4.43)。基线测试没有改变。所有组在2020年的平均LOS都有所下降,但这只对说英语或西班牙语以外语言的患者有意义(结论:我们的数据证实,COVID-19对PLOE患者的影响不成比例,PLOE患者的COVID-19检测呈阳性的可能性是说英语的患者的2.9倍。应该努力通过语言协调的护理、专业翻译、文化上适当的互动和信息传播来减轻这种影响,这不仅与公共卫生危机的规划有关,而且与整个卫生保健系统的日常功能有关。有必要继续研究导致这些不平等的因素和减轻这些不平等的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of COVID-19 on Patients with a Preferred Language Other than English in the Emergency Department.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic had a disproportionate impact on minority communities, including patients who identify as having a preferred language other than English (PLOE). Our primary goal in this study was to evaluate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with a PLOE in the emergency department (ED), and the use of interpreter services. Secondary outcomes evaluated were measures of patient care, including length of stay, number of studies performed, and unplanned return visits to the ED.

Methods: We performed an interrupted time series study of prospectively collected electronic health record (EHR) adult ED and language services data from an urban, safety-net hospital.

Results: The total number of patients presenting to the ED went down in the early peak of the pandemic; however, the percentage of patients with a PLOE went up compared with previous years (19% vs 16%) and, despite making up only 19% of total patients, comprised 44% of total COVID-19 positive patients. In-person interpreter use decreased (prevalence ratio 0.49, 95% confidence Interval [CI] 0.43-0.56) while telephonic and video interpretation increased (prevalence ratio 3.97, 95% CI 3.56-4.43). Baseline testing was unchanged. All groups experienced a decrease in median LOS in 2020, but this was only found to be significant for patients who speak a language other than English or Spanish (P<0.001). None of the patient groups experienced a significant increase in unscheduled returns in 2020.

Conclusion: Our data confirms that COVID-19 disproportionately affected patients with a PLOE, with patients with a PLOE 2.9 times more likely to test positive for COVID-19 than their English-speaking counterparts. Efforts should be made to mitigate this effect via language-concordant care, professional interpreters, and culturally appropriate interaction and information dissemination, not only as it relates to planning for public health crises, but in the day-to-day function of the healthcare system at large. Continued research into the factors driving these inequities and ways to mitigate them is warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
125
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: WestJEM focuses on how the systems and delivery of emergency care affects health, health disparities, and health outcomes in communities and populations worldwide, including the impact of social conditions on the composition of patients seeking care in emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信