{"title":"日本、美国和欧洲老年患者药品标签上处方信息的比较。","authors":"Makoto Onohara, Mamoru Narukawa","doi":"10.1002/pds.70195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The objective of this study was to compare the prescribing information for elderly patients on drug labels in Japan, the United States (U.S.), and Europe to suggest improvements in Japanese package inserts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We surveyed drug labeling regulations in the three regions and selected 39 new drugs approved in Japan between 2012 and 2023 for diseases common in the elderly and approved in the U.S. and Europe. We examined the prescribing information for elderly patients such as dose adjustment instructions and comparison of safety profiles by age.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results revealed that 7.7% of Japanese package inserts provided dosage adjustment instruction for elderly patients, compared with 46.2% and 79.5% of U.S. and European drug labels, respectively. Regarding safety profile comparisons between age groups, 30.8% of Japanese package inserts included this information compared with 94.9% and 23.1% of U.S. and European drug labels, respectively. No Japanese package inserts listed the number of elderly patients included in clinical trials; whereas this information appeared on 89.7% of U.S. labels and 7.7% of European summaries of product characteristics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Japanese package inserts provide less prescribing information for elderly patients than U.S. and European drug labels. To promote appropriate drug use among elderly patients in Japan, package inserts should be improved by incorporating sufficient information, such as clear dosage adjustment instructions and differences in safety profiles by age groups. These enhancements would align Japanese package inserts with international quality, providing healthcare professionals with more comprehensive drug prescribing information for treating elderly patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19782,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","volume":"34 8","pages":"e70195"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Prescribing Information for Elderly Patients on Drug Labels in Japan, the United States, and Europe.\",\"authors\":\"Makoto Onohara, Mamoru Narukawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pds.70195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The objective of this study was to compare the prescribing information for elderly patients on drug labels in Japan, the United States (U.S.), and Europe to suggest improvements in Japanese package inserts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We surveyed drug labeling regulations in the three regions and selected 39 new drugs approved in Japan between 2012 and 2023 for diseases common in the elderly and approved in the U.S. and Europe. We examined the prescribing information for elderly patients such as dose adjustment instructions and comparison of safety profiles by age.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results revealed that 7.7% of Japanese package inserts provided dosage adjustment instruction for elderly patients, compared with 46.2% and 79.5% of U.S. and European drug labels, respectively. Regarding safety profile comparisons between age groups, 30.8% of Japanese package inserts included this information compared with 94.9% and 23.1% of U.S. and European drug labels, respectively. No Japanese package inserts listed the number of elderly patients included in clinical trials; whereas this information appeared on 89.7% of U.S. labels and 7.7% of European summaries of product characteristics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Japanese package inserts provide less prescribing information for elderly patients than U.S. and European drug labels. To promote appropriate drug use among elderly patients in Japan, package inserts should be improved by incorporating sufficient information, such as clear dosage adjustment instructions and differences in safety profiles by age groups. These enhancements would align Japanese package inserts with international quality, providing healthcare professionals with more comprehensive drug prescribing information for treating elderly patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety\",\"volume\":\"34 8\",\"pages\":\"e70195\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.70195\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.70195","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of Prescribing Information for Elderly Patients on Drug Labels in Japan, the United States, and Europe.
Purpose: The objective of this study was to compare the prescribing information for elderly patients on drug labels in Japan, the United States (U.S.), and Europe to suggest improvements in Japanese package inserts.
Methods: We surveyed drug labeling regulations in the three regions and selected 39 new drugs approved in Japan between 2012 and 2023 for diseases common in the elderly and approved in the U.S. and Europe. We examined the prescribing information for elderly patients such as dose adjustment instructions and comparison of safety profiles by age.
Results: The results revealed that 7.7% of Japanese package inserts provided dosage adjustment instruction for elderly patients, compared with 46.2% and 79.5% of U.S. and European drug labels, respectively. Regarding safety profile comparisons between age groups, 30.8% of Japanese package inserts included this information compared with 94.9% and 23.1% of U.S. and European drug labels, respectively. No Japanese package inserts listed the number of elderly patients included in clinical trials; whereas this information appeared on 89.7% of U.S. labels and 7.7% of European summaries of product characteristics.
Conclusions: Japanese package inserts provide less prescribing information for elderly patients than U.S. and European drug labels. To promote appropriate drug use among elderly patients in Japan, package inserts should be improved by incorporating sufficient information, such as clear dosage adjustment instructions and differences in safety profiles by age groups. These enhancements would align Japanese package inserts with international quality, providing healthcare professionals with more comprehensive drug prescribing information for treating elderly patients.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety is to provide an international forum for the communication and evaluation of data, methods and opinion in the discipline of pharmacoepidemiology. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed reports of original research, invited reviews and a variety of guest editorials and commentaries embracing scientific, medical, statistical, legal and economic aspects of pharmacoepidemiology and post-marketing surveillance of drug safety. Appropriate material in these categories may also be considered for publication as a Brief Report.
Particular areas of interest include:
design, analysis, results, and interpretation of studies looking at the benefit or safety of specific pharmaceuticals, biologics, or medical devices, including studies in pharmacovigilance, postmarketing surveillance, pharmacoeconomics, patient safety, molecular pharmacoepidemiology, or any other study within the broad field of pharmacoepidemiology;
comparative effectiveness research relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics, and medical devices. Comparative effectiveness research is the generation and synthesis of evidence that compares the benefits and harms of alternative methods to prevent, diagnose, treat, and monitor a clinical condition, as these methods are truly used in the real world;
methodologic contributions of relevance to pharmacoepidemiology, whether original contributions, reviews of existing methods, or tutorials for how to apply the methods of pharmacoepidemiology;
assessments of harm versus benefit in drug therapy;
patterns of drug utilization;
relationships between pharmacoepidemiology and the formulation and interpretation of regulatory guidelines;
evaluations of risk management plans and programmes relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics and medical devices.