日本、美国和欧洲老年患者药品标签上处方信息的比较。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Makoto Onohara, Mamoru Narukawa
{"title":"日本、美国和欧洲老年患者药品标签上处方信息的比较。","authors":"Makoto Onohara, Mamoru Narukawa","doi":"10.1002/pds.70195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The objective of this study was to compare the prescribing information for elderly patients on drug labels in Japan, the United States (U.S.), and Europe to suggest improvements in Japanese package inserts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We surveyed drug labeling regulations in the three regions and selected 39 new drugs approved in Japan between 2012 and 2023 for diseases common in the elderly and approved in the U.S. and Europe. We examined the prescribing information for elderly patients such as dose adjustment instructions and comparison of safety profiles by age.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results revealed that 7.7% of Japanese package inserts provided dosage adjustment instruction for elderly patients, compared with 46.2% and 79.5% of U.S. and European drug labels, respectively. Regarding safety profile comparisons between age groups, 30.8% of Japanese package inserts included this information compared with 94.9% and 23.1% of U.S. and European drug labels, respectively. No Japanese package inserts listed the number of elderly patients included in clinical trials; whereas this information appeared on 89.7% of U.S. labels and 7.7% of European summaries of product characteristics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Japanese package inserts provide less prescribing information for elderly patients than U.S. and European drug labels. To promote appropriate drug use among elderly patients in Japan, package inserts should be improved by incorporating sufficient information, such as clear dosage adjustment instructions and differences in safety profiles by age groups. These enhancements would align Japanese package inserts with international quality, providing healthcare professionals with more comprehensive drug prescribing information for treating elderly patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19782,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","volume":"34 8","pages":"e70195"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Prescribing Information for Elderly Patients on Drug Labels in Japan, the United States, and Europe.\",\"authors\":\"Makoto Onohara, Mamoru Narukawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pds.70195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The objective of this study was to compare the prescribing information for elderly patients on drug labels in Japan, the United States (U.S.), and Europe to suggest improvements in Japanese package inserts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We surveyed drug labeling regulations in the three regions and selected 39 new drugs approved in Japan between 2012 and 2023 for diseases common in the elderly and approved in the U.S. and Europe. We examined the prescribing information for elderly patients such as dose adjustment instructions and comparison of safety profiles by age.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results revealed that 7.7% of Japanese package inserts provided dosage adjustment instruction for elderly patients, compared with 46.2% and 79.5% of U.S. and European drug labels, respectively. Regarding safety profile comparisons between age groups, 30.8% of Japanese package inserts included this information compared with 94.9% and 23.1% of U.S. and European drug labels, respectively. No Japanese package inserts listed the number of elderly patients included in clinical trials; whereas this information appeared on 89.7% of U.S. labels and 7.7% of European summaries of product characteristics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Japanese package inserts provide less prescribing information for elderly patients than U.S. and European drug labels. To promote appropriate drug use among elderly patients in Japan, package inserts should be improved by incorporating sufficient information, such as clear dosage adjustment instructions and differences in safety profiles by age groups. These enhancements would align Japanese package inserts with international quality, providing healthcare professionals with more comprehensive drug prescribing information for treating elderly patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety\",\"volume\":\"34 8\",\"pages\":\"e70195\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.70195\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.70195","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是比较日本、美国和欧洲药品标签上老年患者的处方信息,以建议日本药品说明书的改进。方法:我们调查了这三个地区的药品标签法规,并选择了2012年至2023年间在日本批准的39种用于老年人常见病的新药,这些新药在美国和欧洲已经批准。我们检查了老年患者的处方信息,如剂量调整说明和按年龄比较的安全性概况。结果:日本药品说明书为老年患者提供剂量调整说明的比例为7.7%,而美国和欧洲药品说明书的比例分别为46.2%和79.5%。关于年龄组间的安全性比较,30.8%的日本药品说明书包含该信息,而美国和欧洲的药品说明书分别为94.9%和23.1%。日本药品说明书中没有列出临床试验中老年患者的数量;而这些信息出现在89.7%的美国标签和7.7%的欧洲产品特征摘要上。结论:日本药品说明书提供给老年患者的处方信息少于美国和欧洲药品说明书。为了促进日本老年患者的适当用药,应改进药品说明书,纳入足够的信息,如明确的剂量调整说明和不同年龄组的安全性差异。这些改进将使日本的药品说明书与国际质量保持一致,为医疗保健专业人员提供更全面的药物处方信息,以治疗老年患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Prescribing Information for Elderly Patients on Drug Labels in Japan, the United States, and Europe.

Purpose: The objective of this study was to compare the prescribing information for elderly patients on drug labels in Japan, the United States (U.S.), and Europe to suggest improvements in Japanese package inserts.

Methods: We surveyed drug labeling regulations in the three regions and selected 39 new drugs approved in Japan between 2012 and 2023 for diseases common in the elderly and approved in the U.S. and Europe. We examined the prescribing information for elderly patients such as dose adjustment instructions and comparison of safety profiles by age.

Results: The results revealed that 7.7% of Japanese package inserts provided dosage adjustment instruction for elderly patients, compared with 46.2% and 79.5% of U.S. and European drug labels, respectively. Regarding safety profile comparisons between age groups, 30.8% of Japanese package inserts included this information compared with 94.9% and 23.1% of U.S. and European drug labels, respectively. No Japanese package inserts listed the number of elderly patients included in clinical trials; whereas this information appeared on 89.7% of U.S. labels and 7.7% of European summaries of product characteristics.

Conclusions: Japanese package inserts provide less prescribing information for elderly patients than U.S. and European drug labels. To promote appropriate drug use among elderly patients in Japan, package inserts should be improved by incorporating sufficient information, such as clear dosage adjustment instructions and differences in safety profiles by age groups. These enhancements would align Japanese package inserts with international quality, providing healthcare professionals with more comprehensive drug prescribing information for treating elderly patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
173
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The aim of Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety is to provide an international forum for the communication and evaluation of data, methods and opinion in the discipline of pharmacoepidemiology. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed reports of original research, invited reviews and a variety of guest editorials and commentaries embracing scientific, medical, statistical, legal and economic aspects of pharmacoepidemiology and post-marketing surveillance of drug safety. Appropriate material in these categories may also be considered for publication as a Brief Report. Particular areas of interest include: design, analysis, results, and interpretation of studies looking at the benefit or safety of specific pharmaceuticals, biologics, or medical devices, including studies in pharmacovigilance, postmarketing surveillance, pharmacoeconomics, patient safety, molecular pharmacoepidemiology, or any other study within the broad field of pharmacoepidemiology; comparative effectiveness research relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics, and medical devices. Comparative effectiveness research is the generation and synthesis of evidence that compares the benefits and harms of alternative methods to prevent, diagnose, treat, and monitor a clinical condition, as these methods are truly used in the real world; methodologic contributions of relevance to pharmacoepidemiology, whether original contributions, reviews of existing methods, or tutorials for how to apply the methods of pharmacoepidemiology; assessments of harm versus benefit in drug therapy; patterns of drug utilization; relationships between pharmacoepidemiology and the formulation and interpretation of regulatory guidelines; evaluations of risk management plans and programmes relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics and medical devices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信