Vanessa Tapioca, Lucas Caetano, Tathiane Gibicoski, Walid Alrayashi, Sara Amaral
{"title":"儿童心脏手术后桌上拔管:系统回顾。","authors":"Vanessa Tapioca, Lucas Caetano, Tathiane Gibicoski, Walid Alrayashi, Sara Amaral","doi":"10.1111/pan.70026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>On-table extubation after pediatric cardiac surgery has been increasingly considered a safe and effective strategy to reduce postoperative ventilation time. However, concerns regarding reintubation risk, patient selection, and variability in outcomes remain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically review the available literature on the effectiveness and safety of on-table extubation compared to off-table extubation in pediatric cardiac surgery. Primary outcomes were reintubation rate, mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes were arterial pH, lactate, and PaCO<sub>2</sub> after surgery.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase were searched from inception to January 8th, 2025, without language or date restrictions. Additional studies were identified through the backward snowballing technique.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing on-table and off-table extubation in pediatric patients (< 18 years) undergoing cardiovascular surgery. Studies with overlapping populations or conference abstracts were excluded.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Two independent reviewers screened studies completed a quality assessment, and extracted data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine studies (2 RCTs, 27 observational), including 9070 patients, met the eligibility criteria. On-table extubation was associated with lower reintubation rates in most studies, though findings were not consistent across all. Mortality rates were generally comparable between groups. ICU and hospital LOS were consistently shorter in the on-table group. Postoperative blood gas analyses showed a better arterial pH, lactate, and PaCO<sub>2</sub> profile in the on-table group. The risk of bias was elevated between observational studies.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Selection bias was present, as the majority of studies were observational, and the decision for on-table extubation was largely based on clinician assessment of suitability and stability at the end of surgery. High heterogeneity across studies limited meta-analysis feasibility.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although this systematic review suggests that on-table extubation may be associated with potentially better outcomes following pediatric cardiac surgery, no safe conclusions can be drawn about its benefit due to the high heterogeneity and potential high risk of bias of most included studies. Well-designed RCTs are needed to confirm the benefits and safety of on-table extubation and to guide appropriate patient selection.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO): CRD42025644238.</p>","PeriodicalId":19745,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On-Table Extubation After Pediatric Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Vanessa Tapioca, Lucas Caetano, Tathiane Gibicoski, Walid Alrayashi, Sara Amaral\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/pan.70026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>On-table extubation after pediatric cardiac surgery has been increasingly considered a safe and effective strategy to reduce postoperative ventilation time. However, concerns regarding reintubation risk, patient selection, and variability in outcomes remain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically review the available literature on the effectiveness and safety of on-table extubation compared to off-table extubation in pediatric cardiac surgery. Primary outcomes were reintubation rate, mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes were arterial pH, lactate, and PaCO<sub>2</sub> after surgery.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase were searched from inception to January 8th, 2025, without language or date restrictions. Additional studies were identified through the backward snowballing technique.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing on-table and off-table extubation in pediatric patients (< 18 years) undergoing cardiovascular surgery. Studies with overlapping populations or conference abstracts were excluded.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Two independent reviewers screened studies completed a quality assessment, and extracted data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine studies (2 RCTs, 27 observational), including 9070 patients, met the eligibility criteria. On-table extubation was associated with lower reintubation rates in most studies, though findings were not consistent across all. Mortality rates were generally comparable between groups. ICU and hospital LOS were consistently shorter in the on-table group. Postoperative blood gas analyses showed a better arterial pH, lactate, and PaCO<sub>2</sub> profile in the on-table group. The risk of bias was elevated between observational studies.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Selection bias was present, as the majority of studies were observational, and the decision for on-table extubation was largely based on clinician assessment of suitability and stability at the end of surgery. High heterogeneity across studies limited meta-analysis feasibility.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although this systematic review suggests that on-table extubation may be associated with potentially better outcomes following pediatric cardiac surgery, no safe conclusions can be drawn about its benefit due to the high heterogeneity and potential high risk of bias of most included studies. Well-designed RCTs are needed to confirm the benefits and safety of on-table extubation and to guide appropriate patient selection.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO): CRD42025644238.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Anesthesia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.70026\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.70026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:儿童心脏手术后桌上拔管已被越来越多地认为是一种安全有效的策略,以减少术后通气时间。然而,对再插管风险、患者选择和结果可变性的担忧仍然存在。目的:系统回顾现有文献,比较表上拔管与表外拔管在小儿心脏手术中的有效性和安全性。主要结局为再插管率、死亡率、重症监护病房(ICU)和住院时间(LOS)。次要结局是术后动脉pH、乳酸和PaCO2。数据来源:MEDLINE、Cochrane图书馆、Web of Science和Embase,检索时间从成立到2025年1月8日,无语言和日期限制。通过反向滚雪球技术确定了其他研究。研究选择:我们纳入了随机对照试验(rct)和观察性研究,比较儿科患者表上拔管和表外拔管。(数据提取:两名独立的评论者筛选了研究,完成了质量评估,并提取了数据。结果:29项研究(2项rct, 27项观察性研究),包括9070例患者符合入选标准。在大多数研究中,桌上拔管与较低的再插管率相关,尽管所有研究结果并不一致。各组之间的死亡率一般具有可比性。住院组ICU和医院LOS均较短。术后血气分析显示,表上组动脉pH值、乳酸和PaCO2谱更好。观察性研究的偏倚风险升高。局限性:存在选择偏倚,因为大多数研究是观察性的,并且在手术结束时,对床上拔管的决定主要基于临床医生对适用性和稳定性的评估。研究间的高异质性限制了meta分析的可行性。结论:尽管本系统综述提示,在台上拔管可能与儿童心脏手术后更好的预后相关,但由于大多数纳入研究的高异质性和潜在的高偏倚风险,无法得出其益处的安全结论。需要设计良好的随机对照试验来确认桌上拔管的益处和安全性,并指导适当的患者选择。试验注册:国际前瞻性系统评价注册(PROSPERO): CRD42025644238。
On-Table Extubation After Pediatric Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review.
Context: On-table extubation after pediatric cardiac surgery has been increasingly considered a safe and effective strategy to reduce postoperative ventilation time. However, concerns regarding reintubation risk, patient selection, and variability in outcomes remain.
Objective: To systematically review the available literature on the effectiveness and safety of on-table extubation compared to off-table extubation in pediatric cardiac surgery. Primary outcomes were reintubation rate, mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes were arterial pH, lactate, and PaCO2 after surgery.
Data sources: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase were searched from inception to January 8th, 2025, without language or date restrictions. Additional studies were identified through the backward snowballing technique.
Study selection: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing on-table and off-table extubation in pediatric patients (< 18 years) undergoing cardiovascular surgery. Studies with overlapping populations or conference abstracts were excluded.
Data extraction: Two independent reviewers screened studies completed a quality assessment, and extracted data.
Results: Twenty-nine studies (2 RCTs, 27 observational), including 9070 patients, met the eligibility criteria. On-table extubation was associated with lower reintubation rates in most studies, though findings were not consistent across all. Mortality rates were generally comparable between groups. ICU and hospital LOS were consistently shorter in the on-table group. Postoperative blood gas analyses showed a better arterial pH, lactate, and PaCO2 profile in the on-table group. The risk of bias was elevated between observational studies.
Limitations: Selection bias was present, as the majority of studies were observational, and the decision for on-table extubation was largely based on clinician assessment of suitability and stability at the end of surgery. High heterogeneity across studies limited meta-analysis feasibility.
Conclusion: Although this systematic review suggests that on-table extubation may be associated with potentially better outcomes following pediatric cardiac surgery, no safe conclusions can be drawn about its benefit due to the high heterogeneity and potential high risk of bias of most included studies. Well-designed RCTs are needed to confirm the benefits and safety of on-table extubation and to guide appropriate patient selection.
Trial registration: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO): CRD42025644238.
期刊介绍:
Devoted to the dissemination of research of interest and importance to practising anesthetists everywhere, the scientific and clinical content of Pediatric Anesthesia covers a wide selection of medical disciplines in all areas relevant to paediatric anaesthesia, pain management and peri-operative medicine. The International Editorial Board is supported by the Editorial Advisory Board and a team of Senior Advisors, to ensure that the journal is publishing the best work from the front line of research in the field. The journal publishes high-quality, relevant scientific and clinical research papers, reviews, commentaries, pro-con debates, historical vignettes, correspondence, case presentations and book reviews.