具有显性阳性和阴性症状的精神分裂症患者执行功能的不同神经激活模式:一项fNIRS研究

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Yinqing Xu, Xiaoning Huo, Xiaolong Yang, Yutai Ma, Yongjie Wang, Jibao Deng, Haozhong Zheng, Meihong Xiu, Fengchun Wu
{"title":"具有显性阳性和阴性症状的精神分裂症患者执行功能的不同神经激活模式:一项fNIRS研究","authors":"Yinqing Xu, Xiaoning Huo, Xiaolong Yang, Yutai Ma, Yongjie Wang, Jibao Deng, Haozhong Zheng, Meihong Xiu, Fengchun Wu","doi":"10.1093/ijnp/pyaf058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the differences in executive functions, specifically cognitive flexibility and inhibitory control, between schizophrenia (SCH) patients with predominantly positive symptoms (PSD) and those with predominantly negative symptoms (NSD), compared to healthy controls, using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-two patients with SCH and 29 control subjects were recruited in the study. We employed fNIRS to measure brain activation while participants performed 2 tasks: a cognitive flexibility-switching task and the Stroop task, which assesses inhibitory control. Performance metrics included accuracy and reaction time. The study included 3 groups: SCH patients with PSD, SCH patients with NSD, and healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with SCH exhibited lower accuracy and longer reaction times compared to healthy controls. In terms of brain activation, the PSD group showed the highest levels of prefrontal activation, followed by healthy controls, while the NSD group had the lowest activation levels. Patients had lower accuracy and longer reaction times than healthy controls. The PSD group showed excessive activation in both prefrontal cortex and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during both the congruent condition and incongruent condition of the Stroop task. In contrast, the NSD group exhibited higher prefrontal activation under congruent conditions but significantly reduced activation under incongruent conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings highlight distinct patterns of executive function deficits and brain activation in SCH patients with PSD and NSD. These results suggest that symptom profiles may influence the nature and severity of cognitive impairments and associated neural mechanisms. Future research should further explore these differences to inform targeted interventions and improve clinical outcomes for individuals with SCH.</p>","PeriodicalId":14134,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12400924/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distinct neural activation patterns in executive functions of schizophrenia patients with predominant positive and negative symptoms: an fNIRS study.\",\"authors\":\"Yinqing Xu, Xiaoning Huo, Xiaolong Yang, Yutai Ma, Yongjie Wang, Jibao Deng, Haozhong Zheng, Meihong Xiu, Fengchun Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ijnp/pyaf058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the differences in executive functions, specifically cognitive flexibility and inhibitory control, between schizophrenia (SCH) patients with predominantly positive symptoms (PSD) and those with predominantly negative symptoms (NSD), compared to healthy controls, using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-two patients with SCH and 29 control subjects were recruited in the study. We employed fNIRS to measure brain activation while participants performed 2 tasks: a cognitive flexibility-switching task and the Stroop task, which assesses inhibitory control. Performance metrics included accuracy and reaction time. The study included 3 groups: SCH patients with PSD, SCH patients with NSD, and healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with SCH exhibited lower accuracy and longer reaction times compared to healthy controls. In terms of brain activation, the PSD group showed the highest levels of prefrontal activation, followed by healthy controls, while the NSD group had the lowest activation levels. Patients had lower accuracy and longer reaction times than healthy controls. The PSD group showed excessive activation in both prefrontal cortex and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during both the congruent condition and incongruent condition of the Stroop task. In contrast, the NSD group exhibited higher prefrontal activation under congruent conditions but significantly reduced activation under incongruent conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings highlight distinct patterns of executive function deficits and brain activation in SCH patients with PSD and NSD. These results suggest that symptom profiles may influence the nature and severity of cognitive impairments and associated neural mechanisms. Future research should further explore these differences to inform targeted interventions and improve clinical outcomes for individuals with SCH.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12400924/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyaf058\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyaf058","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:利用功能近红外光谱(fNIRS)研究精神分裂症(SCH)主要阳性症状(PSD)患者和主要阴性症状(NSD)患者与健康对照组相比在执行功能,特别是认知灵活性和抑制控制方面的差异。方法:选取52例SCH患者和29例对照组进行研究。当参与者完成两项任务时,我们使用近红外光谱来测量大脑的激活情况:一项是认知灵活性转换任务,另一项是评估抑制控制的Stroop任务。性能指标包括准确性和反应时间。该研究包括三组:伴有PSD的SCH患者、伴有NSD的SCH患者和健康对照组。结果:与健康对照相比,SCH患者表现出较低的准确性和较长的反应时间。在大脑激活方面,PSD组的前额叶激活水平最高,其次是健康对照组,而NSD组的激活水平最低。与健康对照组相比,患者的准确率较低,反应时间较长。在Stroop任务的一致条件和不一致条件下,PSD组前额叶皮层和背外侧前额叶皮层均表现出过度激活。相反,NSD组在一致条件下表现出较高的前额叶激活,但在不一致条件下显着降低激活。结论:我们的研究结果突出了SCH合并PSD和NSD患者的执行功能缺陷和脑激活的不同模式。这些结果表明,症状特征可能影响认知障碍的性质和严重程度以及相关的神经机制。未来的研究应进一步探索这些差异,为有针对性的干预提供信息,并改善SCH患者的临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Distinct neural activation patterns in executive functions of schizophrenia patients with predominant positive and negative symptoms: an fNIRS study.

Distinct neural activation patterns in executive functions of schizophrenia patients with predominant positive and negative symptoms: an fNIRS study.

Distinct neural activation patterns in executive functions of schizophrenia patients with predominant positive and negative symptoms: an fNIRS study.

Distinct neural activation patterns in executive functions of schizophrenia patients with predominant positive and negative symptoms: an fNIRS study.

Objective: To investigate the differences in executive functions, specifically cognitive flexibility and inhibitory control, between schizophrenia (SCH) patients with predominantly positive symptoms (PSD) and those with predominantly negative symptoms (NSD), compared to healthy controls, using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS).

Methods: Fifty-two patients with SCH and 29 control subjects were recruited in the study. We employed fNIRS to measure brain activation while participants performed 2 tasks: a cognitive flexibility-switching task and the Stroop task, which assesses inhibitory control. Performance metrics included accuracy and reaction time. The study included 3 groups: SCH patients with PSD, SCH patients with NSD, and healthy controls.

Results: Patients with SCH exhibited lower accuracy and longer reaction times compared to healthy controls. In terms of brain activation, the PSD group showed the highest levels of prefrontal activation, followed by healthy controls, while the NSD group had the lowest activation levels. Patients had lower accuracy and longer reaction times than healthy controls. The PSD group showed excessive activation in both prefrontal cortex and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during both the congruent condition and incongruent condition of the Stroop task. In contrast, the NSD group exhibited higher prefrontal activation under congruent conditions but significantly reduced activation under incongruent conditions.

Conclusion: Our findings highlight distinct patterns of executive function deficits and brain activation in SCH patients with PSD and NSD. These results suggest that symptom profiles may influence the nature and severity of cognitive impairments and associated neural mechanisms. Future research should further explore these differences to inform targeted interventions and improve clinical outcomes for individuals with SCH.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
230
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The central focus of the journal is on research that advances understanding of existing and new neuropsychopharmacological agents including their mode of action and clinical application or provides insights into the biological basis of psychiatric disorders and thereby advances their pharmacological treatment. Such research may derive from the full spectrum of biological and psychological fields of inquiry encompassing classical and novel techniques in neuropsychopharmacology as well as strategies such as neuroimaging, genetics, psychoneuroendocrinology and neuropsychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信