Milica Scepanovic, Ivan Stankovic, Tamara Jemcov, Ivona Vranic, Aleksandra Maksimovic, Rodoljub Markovic, Nadezda Zec, Jovana Kusic Milicevic, Aleksandar N Neskovic
{"title":"机械弥散预测左心室射血分数保留的透析依赖患者的生存。","authors":"Milica Scepanovic, Ivan Stankovic, Tamara Jemcov, Ivona Vranic, Aleksandra Maksimovic, Rodoljub Markovic, Nadezda Zec, Jovana Kusic Milicevic, Aleksandar N Neskovic","doi":"10.1007/s11739-025-04073-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of mortality in chronic kidney disease patients undergoing renal replacement therapy (RRT). Echocardiographic risk assessment, especially in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), may help identifying at-risk individuals. This study evaluates the prognostic significance of left ventricular (LV) mass global longitudinal strain (GLS) and mechanical dispersion in RRT patients with preserved LVEF. We prospectively followed 78 RRT patients with LVEF ≥ 50% over 55 ± 6 months to assess all-cause mortality. LV mass was determined using linear measurements and indexed to body surface area to obtain LV mass index (LVMI). GLS was calculated as the average of 18 segmental peak systolic strain values while mechanical dispersion was calculated from time intervals measured from the ECG R-wave to peak longitudinal strain across 18 LV segments. LV hypertrophy was observed in 58% of patients. Over a median follow-up of 55 ± 6 months, 29 patients (37%) died. Univariate Cox regression analysis identified age, diabetes mellitus, LVMI, GLS, and mechanical dispersion as predictors of all-cause mortality. Multivariate analysis confirmed that age [hazard ratio (HR) 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.07, p = 0.014], LVMI (HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.03, p = 0.001), GLS (HR 0.77, 95%CI 0.66-0.88, p = 0.014) and mechanical dispersion (HR 2.16, 95% CI 1.03-4.52, p = 0.042) were independent mortality predictors. In dialysis-dependent patients with preserved LVEF, increased mechanical dispersion is associated with worse survival. This parameter, when combined with LVMI and GLS, could serve as an additional tool for risk stratification in this vulnerable patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":13662,"journal":{"name":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanical dispersion predicts survival of dialysis-dependent patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.\",\"authors\":\"Milica Scepanovic, Ivan Stankovic, Tamara Jemcov, Ivona Vranic, Aleksandra Maksimovic, Rodoljub Markovic, Nadezda Zec, Jovana Kusic Milicevic, Aleksandar N Neskovic\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11739-025-04073-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of mortality in chronic kidney disease patients undergoing renal replacement therapy (RRT). Echocardiographic risk assessment, especially in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), may help identifying at-risk individuals. This study evaluates the prognostic significance of left ventricular (LV) mass global longitudinal strain (GLS) and mechanical dispersion in RRT patients with preserved LVEF. We prospectively followed 78 RRT patients with LVEF ≥ 50% over 55 ± 6 months to assess all-cause mortality. LV mass was determined using linear measurements and indexed to body surface area to obtain LV mass index (LVMI). GLS was calculated as the average of 18 segmental peak systolic strain values while mechanical dispersion was calculated from time intervals measured from the ECG R-wave to peak longitudinal strain across 18 LV segments. LV hypertrophy was observed in 58% of patients. Over a median follow-up of 55 ± 6 months, 29 patients (37%) died. Univariate Cox regression analysis identified age, diabetes mellitus, LVMI, GLS, and mechanical dispersion as predictors of all-cause mortality. Multivariate analysis confirmed that age [hazard ratio (HR) 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.07, p = 0.014], LVMI (HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.03, p = 0.001), GLS (HR 0.77, 95%CI 0.66-0.88, p = 0.014) and mechanical dispersion (HR 2.16, 95% CI 1.03-4.52, p = 0.042) were independent mortality predictors. In dialysis-dependent patients with preserved LVEF, increased mechanical dispersion is associated with worse survival. This parameter, when combined with LVMI and GLS, could serve as an additional tool for risk stratification in this vulnerable patient population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internal and Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internal and Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-025-04073-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-025-04073-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
心血管疾病是接受肾脏替代治疗(RRT)的慢性肾病患者死亡的主要原因。超声心动图风险评估,特别是保留左心室射血分数(LVEF)的患者,可能有助于识别高危个体。本研究评估左心室质量(LV)整体纵向应变(GLS)和机械离散度对RRT患者保留LVEF的预后意义。我们对78例LVEF≥50%的RRT患者进行了55±6个月的前瞻性随访,以评估全因死亡率。采用线性测量法测定左室质量,并以体表面积为指标,得到左室质量指数(LVMI)。GLS计算为18节段收缩应变峰值的平均值,而机械弥散度计算为心电图r波到18节段纵向应变峰值的时间间隔。58%的患者出现左室肥大。在中位随访55±6个月期间,29例(37%)患者死亡。单因素Cox回归分析确定年龄、糖尿病、LVMI、GLS和机械离散度是全因死亡率的预测因子。多因素分析证实,年龄[危险比(HR) 1.04, 95%可信区间(CI) 1.01 ~ 1.07, p = 0.014]、LVMI (HR 1.02, 95%CI 1.01 ~ 1.03, p = 0.001)、GLS (HR 0.77, 95%CI 0.66 ~ 0.88, p = 0.014)和机械离散度(HR 2.16, 95%CI 1.03 ~ 4.52, p = 0.042)是独立的死亡预测因子。在保留LVEF的透析依赖患者中,机械弥散度增加与生存率降低相关。当该参数与LVMI和GLS结合使用时,可以作为易感患者群体风险分层的额外工具。
Mechanical dispersion predicts survival of dialysis-dependent patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.
Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of mortality in chronic kidney disease patients undergoing renal replacement therapy (RRT). Echocardiographic risk assessment, especially in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), may help identifying at-risk individuals. This study evaluates the prognostic significance of left ventricular (LV) mass global longitudinal strain (GLS) and mechanical dispersion in RRT patients with preserved LVEF. We prospectively followed 78 RRT patients with LVEF ≥ 50% over 55 ± 6 months to assess all-cause mortality. LV mass was determined using linear measurements and indexed to body surface area to obtain LV mass index (LVMI). GLS was calculated as the average of 18 segmental peak systolic strain values while mechanical dispersion was calculated from time intervals measured from the ECG R-wave to peak longitudinal strain across 18 LV segments. LV hypertrophy was observed in 58% of patients. Over a median follow-up of 55 ± 6 months, 29 patients (37%) died. Univariate Cox regression analysis identified age, diabetes mellitus, LVMI, GLS, and mechanical dispersion as predictors of all-cause mortality. Multivariate analysis confirmed that age [hazard ratio (HR) 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.07, p = 0.014], LVMI (HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.03, p = 0.001), GLS (HR 0.77, 95%CI 0.66-0.88, p = 0.014) and mechanical dispersion (HR 2.16, 95% CI 1.03-4.52, p = 0.042) were independent mortality predictors. In dialysis-dependent patients with preserved LVEF, increased mechanical dispersion is associated with worse survival. This parameter, when combined with LVMI and GLS, could serve as an additional tool for risk stratification in this vulnerable patient population.
期刊介绍:
Internal and Emergency Medicine (IEM) is an independent, international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal designed for internists and emergency physicians. IEM publishes a variety of manuscript types including Original investigations, Review articles, Letters to the Editor, Editorials and Commentaries. Occasionally IEM accepts unsolicited Reviews, Commentaries or Editorials. The journal is divided into three sections, i.e., Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment, with three separate editorial boards. In the Internal Medicine section, invited Case records and Physical examinations, devoted to underlining the role of a clinical approach in selected clinical cases, are also published. The Emergency Medicine section will include a Morbidity and Mortality Report and an Airway Forum concerning the management of difficult airway problems. As far as Critical Care is becoming an integral part of Emergency Medicine, a new sub-section will report the literature that concerns the interface not only for the care of the critical patient in the Emergency Department, but also in the Intensive Care Unit. Finally, in the Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment section brief discussions of topics of evidence-based medicine (Cochrane’s corner) and Research updates are published. IEM encourages letters of rebuttal and criticism of published articles. Topics of interest include all subjects that relate to the science and practice of Internal and Emergency Medicine.