Noha Ferrah, Lucas Neumaier, Joseph Ibrahim, Belinda Gabbe, Ben Beck, Peter Cameron
{"title":"评估老年人创伤护理干预措施:一项共识研究。","authors":"Noha Ferrah, Lucas Neumaier, Joseph Ibrahim, Belinda Gabbe, Ben Beck, Peter Cameron","doi":"10.1111/imj.70171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trauma care of older adults is an important and growing public health issue. Countries such as the United States and United Kingdom have published best-practice guidelines on the management of older trauma patients. In Australia, there are no such guidelines. Australian guidelines are needed as there are unique contextual challenges, including low population density and large distances between the site of injury and where treatment is administered.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To determine which interventions for managing older trauma patients should be prioritised for inclusion in national guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A consensus method with two survey rounds was conducted with a range of health professionals involved in delivering trauma care for older adults. In round 1, participants were asked which of 28 interventions should be included in national guidelines. Consensus was defined as ≥80% agreement. In round 2, participants ranked interventions in order of priority for inclusion in guidelines. Interventions were classified into pre-hospital care, in-hospital initial assessment, inpatient care, transition care and education.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 32 and 25 participants completed rounds 1 and 2 of the survey respectively. Of 28 interventions proposed for national guidelines, 15 reached consensus. Key priority interventions included geriatric-specific triage, documented goals of care, trauma team activation criteria, multidisciplinary geriatric care and training modules in older trauma care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified 15 interventions that trauma clinicians agreed should be considered for inclusion in guidelines for the management of older adult trauma. Given the burden of older adult trauma, a national consensus guideline should be prioritised and a working group formed.</p>","PeriodicalId":13625,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of interventions for trauma care in older adults: a consensus study.\",\"authors\":\"Noha Ferrah, Lucas Neumaier, Joseph Ibrahim, Belinda Gabbe, Ben Beck, Peter Cameron\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/imj.70171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trauma care of older adults is an important and growing public health issue. Countries such as the United States and United Kingdom have published best-practice guidelines on the management of older trauma patients. In Australia, there are no such guidelines. Australian guidelines are needed as there are unique contextual challenges, including low population density and large distances between the site of injury and where treatment is administered.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To determine which interventions for managing older trauma patients should be prioritised for inclusion in national guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A consensus method with two survey rounds was conducted with a range of health professionals involved in delivering trauma care for older adults. In round 1, participants were asked which of 28 interventions should be included in national guidelines. Consensus was defined as ≥80% agreement. In round 2, participants ranked interventions in order of priority for inclusion in guidelines. Interventions were classified into pre-hospital care, in-hospital initial assessment, inpatient care, transition care and education.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 32 and 25 participants completed rounds 1 and 2 of the survey respectively. Of 28 interventions proposed for national guidelines, 15 reached consensus. Key priority interventions included geriatric-specific triage, documented goals of care, trauma team activation criteria, multidisciplinary geriatric care and training modules in older trauma care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified 15 interventions that trauma clinicians agreed should be considered for inclusion in guidelines for the management of older adult trauma. Given the burden of older adult trauma, a national consensus guideline should be prioritised and a working group formed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internal Medicine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internal Medicine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.70171\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.70171","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of interventions for trauma care in older adults: a consensus study.
Background: Trauma care of older adults is an important and growing public health issue. Countries such as the United States and United Kingdom have published best-practice guidelines on the management of older trauma patients. In Australia, there are no such guidelines. Australian guidelines are needed as there are unique contextual challenges, including low population density and large distances between the site of injury and where treatment is administered.
Aims: To determine which interventions for managing older trauma patients should be prioritised for inclusion in national guidelines.
Methods: A consensus method with two survey rounds was conducted with a range of health professionals involved in delivering trauma care for older adults. In round 1, participants were asked which of 28 interventions should be included in national guidelines. Consensus was defined as ≥80% agreement. In round 2, participants ranked interventions in order of priority for inclusion in guidelines. Interventions were classified into pre-hospital care, in-hospital initial assessment, inpatient care, transition care and education.
Results: A total of 32 and 25 participants completed rounds 1 and 2 of the survey respectively. Of 28 interventions proposed for national guidelines, 15 reached consensus. Key priority interventions included geriatric-specific triage, documented goals of care, trauma team activation criteria, multidisciplinary geriatric care and training modules in older trauma care.
Conclusions: This study identified 15 interventions that trauma clinicians agreed should be considered for inclusion in guidelines for the management of older adult trauma. Given the burden of older adult trauma, a national consensus guideline should be prioritised and a working group formed.
期刊介绍:
The Internal Medicine Journal is the official journal of the Adult Medicine Division of The Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP). Its purpose is to publish high-quality internationally competitive peer-reviewed original medical research, both laboratory and clinical, relating to the study and research of human disease. Papers will be considered from all areas of medical practice and science. The Journal also has a major role in continuing medical education and publishes review articles relevant to physician education.