评估老年人创伤护理干预措施:一项共识研究。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Noha Ferrah, Lucas Neumaier, Joseph Ibrahim, Belinda Gabbe, Ben Beck, Peter Cameron
{"title":"评估老年人创伤护理干预措施:一项共识研究。","authors":"Noha Ferrah, Lucas Neumaier, Joseph Ibrahim, Belinda Gabbe, Ben Beck, Peter Cameron","doi":"10.1111/imj.70171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trauma care of older adults is an important and growing public health issue. Countries such as the United States and United Kingdom have published best-practice guidelines on the management of older trauma patients. In Australia, there are no such guidelines. Australian guidelines are needed as there are unique contextual challenges, including low population density and large distances between the site of injury and where treatment is administered.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To determine which interventions for managing older trauma patients should be prioritised for inclusion in national guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A consensus method with two survey rounds was conducted with a range of health professionals involved in delivering trauma care for older adults. In round 1, participants were asked which of 28 interventions should be included in national guidelines. Consensus was defined as ≥80% agreement. In round 2, participants ranked interventions in order of priority for inclusion in guidelines. Interventions were classified into pre-hospital care, in-hospital initial assessment, inpatient care, transition care and education.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 32 and 25 participants completed rounds 1 and 2 of the survey respectively. Of 28 interventions proposed for national guidelines, 15 reached consensus. Key priority interventions included geriatric-specific triage, documented goals of care, trauma team activation criteria, multidisciplinary geriatric care and training modules in older trauma care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified 15 interventions that trauma clinicians agreed should be considered for inclusion in guidelines for the management of older adult trauma. Given the burden of older adult trauma, a national consensus guideline should be prioritised and a working group formed.</p>","PeriodicalId":13625,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of interventions for trauma care in older adults: a consensus study.\",\"authors\":\"Noha Ferrah, Lucas Neumaier, Joseph Ibrahim, Belinda Gabbe, Ben Beck, Peter Cameron\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/imj.70171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trauma care of older adults is an important and growing public health issue. Countries such as the United States and United Kingdom have published best-practice guidelines on the management of older trauma patients. In Australia, there are no such guidelines. Australian guidelines are needed as there are unique contextual challenges, including low population density and large distances between the site of injury and where treatment is administered.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To determine which interventions for managing older trauma patients should be prioritised for inclusion in national guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A consensus method with two survey rounds was conducted with a range of health professionals involved in delivering trauma care for older adults. In round 1, participants were asked which of 28 interventions should be included in national guidelines. Consensus was defined as ≥80% agreement. In round 2, participants ranked interventions in order of priority for inclusion in guidelines. Interventions were classified into pre-hospital care, in-hospital initial assessment, inpatient care, transition care and education.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 32 and 25 participants completed rounds 1 and 2 of the survey respectively. Of 28 interventions proposed for national guidelines, 15 reached consensus. Key priority interventions included geriatric-specific triage, documented goals of care, trauma team activation criteria, multidisciplinary geriatric care and training modules in older trauma care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified 15 interventions that trauma clinicians agreed should be considered for inclusion in guidelines for the management of older adult trauma. Given the burden of older adult trauma, a national consensus guideline should be prioritised and a working group formed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internal Medicine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internal Medicine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.70171\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.70171","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:老年人创伤护理是一个重要且日益增长的公共卫生问题。美国和英国等国家已经发布了关于老年创伤患者管理的最佳实践指南。在澳大利亚,没有这样的指导方针。澳大利亚的指导方针是必要的,因为有独特的环境挑战,包括人口密度低,受伤地点和治疗地点之间距离很远。目的:确定哪些治疗老年创伤患者的干预措施应优先纳入国家指南。方法:采用两轮调查的共识方法,对参与为老年人提供创伤护理的一系列卫生专业人员进行了调查。在第一轮中,参与者被问及28项干预措施中哪一项应列入国家指导方针。一致定义为≥80%的同意。在第二轮中,参与者按优先顺序将干预措施列入指南。干预措施分为院前护理、院内初步评估、住院护理、过渡护理和教育。结果:共有32名和25名参与者分别完成了第1轮和第2轮调查。在为国家指南提出的28项干预措施中,有15项达成了共识。重点干预措施包括针对老年人的分诊、记录在案的护理目标、创伤小组激活标准、多学科老年护理和老年创伤护理培训模块。结论:本研究确定了创伤临床医生认为应考虑纳入老年人创伤治疗指南的15种干预措施。鉴于老年人创伤的负担,应优先制定一项全国共识指南,并成立一个工作组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of interventions for trauma care in older adults: a consensus study.

Background: Trauma care of older adults is an important and growing public health issue. Countries such as the United States and United Kingdom have published best-practice guidelines on the management of older trauma patients. In Australia, there are no such guidelines. Australian guidelines are needed as there are unique contextual challenges, including low population density and large distances between the site of injury and where treatment is administered.

Aims: To determine which interventions for managing older trauma patients should be prioritised for inclusion in national guidelines.

Methods: A consensus method with two survey rounds was conducted with a range of health professionals involved in delivering trauma care for older adults. In round 1, participants were asked which of 28 interventions should be included in national guidelines. Consensus was defined as ≥80% agreement. In round 2, participants ranked interventions in order of priority for inclusion in guidelines. Interventions were classified into pre-hospital care, in-hospital initial assessment, inpatient care, transition care and education.

Results: A total of 32 and 25 participants completed rounds 1 and 2 of the survey respectively. Of 28 interventions proposed for national guidelines, 15 reached consensus. Key priority interventions included geriatric-specific triage, documented goals of care, trauma team activation criteria, multidisciplinary geriatric care and training modules in older trauma care.

Conclusions: This study identified 15 interventions that trauma clinicians agreed should be considered for inclusion in guidelines for the management of older adult trauma. Given the burden of older adult trauma, a national consensus guideline should be prioritised and a working group formed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Internal Medicine Journal
Internal Medicine Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
600
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Internal Medicine Journal is the official journal of the Adult Medicine Division of The Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP). Its purpose is to publish high-quality internationally competitive peer-reviewed original medical research, both laboratory and clinical, relating to the study and research of human disease. Papers will be considered from all areas of medical practice and science. The Journal also has a major role in continuing medical education and publishes review articles relevant to physician education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信