错过预约:全科医生缺席的伦理问题

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Richard C. Armitage
{"title":"错过预约:全科医生缺席的伦理问题","authors":"Richard C. Armitage","doi":"10.1111/jep.70222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>A substantial number of general practice appointments in England are missed each year, which incurs considerable cost to the NHS. In the absence of an authoritative policy, there is variation in how GPs manage missed appointments in this setting. There are various reasons for why patients miss their GP appointments, many of which lie outside the patients' control.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This paper undertakes an ethical analysis, using the framework of Principlism, of missed GP appointments in the NHS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>This paper finds that missed appointments might prevent the patient's autonomy (which requires the health problem for which the GP appointment was booked to be adequately addressed) from being upheld, frustrate the possibility of promoting beneficence (particularly among patients with multimorbidity and mental health problems), threaten non-maleficence (also particularly among patients with multimorbidity and mental health problems), and violate the principle of justice due to exacerbating health inequalities and wasted scarce healthcare resources.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This paper suggests that GPs should make efforts to contact patients who miss their appointments, via telephone in cases of missed in-person appointments, and via multiple attempted calls in cases of missed telephone or online appointments.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jep.70222","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Missed Appointments: The Ethics of Nonattendance in General Practice\",\"authors\":\"Richard C. Armitage\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jep.70222\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>A substantial number of general practice appointments in England are missed each year, which incurs considerable cost to the NHS. In the absence of an authoritative policy, there is variation in how GPs manage missed appointments in this setting. There are various reasons for why patients miss their GP appointments, many of which lie outside the patients' control.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This paper undertakes an ethical analysis, using the framework of Principlism, of missed GP appointments in the NHS.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Findings</h3>\\n \\n <p>This paper finds that missed appointments might prevent the patient's autonomy (which requires the health problem for which the GP appointment was booked to be adequately addressed) from being upheld, frustrate the possibility of promoting beneficence (particularly among patients with multimorbidity and mental health problems), threaten non-maleficence (also particularly among patients with multimorbidity and mental health problems), and violate the principle of justice due to exacerbating health inequalities and wasted scarce healthcare resources.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>This paper suggests that GPs should make efforts to contact patients who miss their appointments, via telephone in cases of missed in-person appointments, and via multiple attempted calls in cases of missed telephone or online appointments.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"31 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jep.70222\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70222\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70222","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在英国,每年都有大量的全科医生预约被错过,这给NHS带来了相当大的成本。在缺乏权威政策的情况下,在这种情况下,全科医生如何管理错过的预约存在差异。患者错过全科医生预约的原因有很多,其中很多都是患者无法控制的。方法本文采用原则框架对NHS错过全科医生预约进行伦理分析。本论文发现,错过预约可能会阻止患者的自主权(这需要全科医生预约的健康问题得到充分解决)得到维护,挫败促进善行的可能性(特别是在患有多种疾病和精神健康问题的患者中),威胁非恶意行为(特别是在患有多种疾病和精神健康问题的患者中),并因加剧卫生不平等和浪费稀缺的医疗资源而违反正义原则。结论建议全科医生应努力联系错过预约的患者,如果错过了亲自预约,则通过电话联系;如果错过了电话或网上预约,则通过多次尝试电话联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On Missed Appointments: The Ethics of Nonattendance in General Practice

Introduction

A substantial number of general practice appointments in England are missed each year, which incurs considerable cost to the NHS. In the absence of an authoritative policy, there is variation in how GPs manage missed appointments in this setting. There are various reasons for why patients miss their GP appointments, many of which lie outside the patients' control.

Methods

This paper undertakes an ethical analysis, using the framework of Principlism, of missed GP appointments in the NHS.

Findings

This paper finds that missed appointments might prevent the patient's autonomy (which requires the health problem for which the GP appointment was booked to be adequately addressed) from being upheld, frustrate the possibility of promoting beneficence (particularly among patients with multimorbidity and mental health problems), threaten non-maleficence (also particularly among patients with multimorbidity and mental health problems), and violate the principle of justice due to exacerbating health inequalities and wasted scarce healthcare resources.

Conclusion

This paper suggests that GPs should make efforts to contact patients who miss their appointments, via telephone in cases of missed in-person appointments, and via multiple attempted calls in cases of missed telephone or online appointments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信