对医疗人工智能的信任:以移动健康糖尿病应用程序为例

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Sophie Materne, Stefano Canali, Daniele Chiffi
{"title":"对医疗人工智能的信任:以移动健康糖尿病应用程序为例","authors":"Sophie Materne,&nbsp;Stefano Canali,&nbsp;Daniele Chiffi","doi":"10.1111/jep.70216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Over the past few years, mobile health applications (mHealth apps) have gained popularity regarding the management of chronic conditions, such as diabetes, as they are considered to enhance follow-up and treatment. Indeed, these applications are powerful tools that support individualised pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical care by remotely monitoring the patient's health status in real-time. Nevertheless, concerns have been raised regarding trust and trustworthiness towards their use, in particular, when they are powered by Artificial Intelligence (AI). Trust in AI is a multifaceted notion that encompasses aspects such as reliance, risk, as well as ethical principles (e.g., respect for human autonomy and prevention of harm). In this paper, we provide an analysis of trust and trustworthiness in AI-powered mHealth apps for diabetes through the lens of philosophy and risk analysis to promote the patient's well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jep.70216","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trust in Medical AI: The Case of mHealth Diabetes Apps\",\"authors\":\"Sophie Materne,&nbsp;Stefano Canali,&nbsp;Daniele Chiffi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jep.70216\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Over the past few years, mobile health applications (mHealth apps) have gained popularity regarding the management of chronic conditions, such as diabetes, as they are considered to enhance follow-up and treatment. Indeed, these applications are powerful tools that support individualised pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical care by remotely monitoring the patient's health status in real-time. Nevertheless, concerns have been raised regarding trust and trustworthiness towards their use, in particular, when they are powered by Artificial Intelligence (AI). Trust in AI is a multifaceted notion that encompasses aspects such as reliance, risk, as well as ethical principles (e.g., respect for human autonomy and prevention of harm). In this paper, we provide an analysis of trust and trustworthiness in AI-powered mHealth apps for diabetes through the lens of philosophy and risk analysis to promote the patient's well-being.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"31 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jep.70216\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70216\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70216","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去几年中,移动健康应用程序(移动健康应用程序)在慢性疾病(如糖尿病)的管理方面越来越受欢迎,因为它们被认为可以加强随访和治疗。事实上,这些应用程序是强大的工具,通过实时远程监控患者的健康状况,支持个性化的药物和非药物护理。然而,人们对其使用的信任和可信赖性提出了担忧,特别是当它们由人工智能(AI)驱动时。对人工智能的信任是一个多方面的概念,包括依赖、风险以及道德原则(例如,尊重人类的自主权和防止伤害)等方面。在本文中,我们通过哲学和风险分析的视角,对ai驱动的糖尿病移动健康应用程序的信任和可信赖性进行了分析,以促进患者的健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trust in Medical AI: The Case of mHealth Diabetes Apps

Over the past few years, mobile health applications (mHealth apps) have gained popularity regarding the management of chronic conditions, such as diabetes, as they are considered to enhance follow-up and treatment. Indeed, these applications are powerful tools that support individualised pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical care by remotely monitoring the patient's health status in real-time. Nevertheless, concerns have been raised regarding trust and trustworthiness towards their use, in particular, when they are powered by Artificial Intelligence (AI). Trust in AI is a multifaceted notion that encompasses aspects such as reliance, risk, as well as ethical principles (e.g., respect for human autonomy and prevention of harm). In this paper, we provide an analysis of trust and trustworthiness in AI-powered mHealth apps for diabetes through the lens of philosophy and risk analysis to promote the patient's well-being.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信