解决遗传咨询中的家庭沟通:过程研究的范围审查

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Maria Barbosa, Milena Paneque, Sofia Fontoura Dias, Filipa Júlio, Jorge Sequeiros, Liliana Sousa, Angus Clarke, Alison Metcalfe, Célia M. D. Sales, Álvaro Mendes
{"title":"解决遗传咨询中的家庭沟通:过程研究的范围审查","authors":"Maria Barbosa,&nbsp;Milena Paneque,&nbsp;Sofia Fontoura Dias,&nbsp;Filipa Júlio,&nbsp;Jorge Sequeiros,&nbsp;Liliana Sousa,&nbsp;Angus Clarke,&nbsp;Alison Metcalfe,&nbsp;Célia M. D. Sales,&nbsp;Álvaro Mendes","doi":"10.1002/jgc4.70067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Process studies explore the content and dynamics established during genetic counseling (GC), allowing a greater understanding of what happens. No literature review has specifically examined how family communication of genetic information has been addressed in GC process studies. To fill this gap, a scoping review was conducted. Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and PsycInfo were searched, resulting in 21 articles for analysis. Most studies were retrospective (<i>n</i> = 19) and qualitative (<i>n</i> = 15) and involved hereditary cancer syndromes (<i>n =</i> 13). Studies analyzed how family communication of genetic information is addressed in GC by either focusing on patients' experiences and perspectives, or genetic healthcare professionals' (GHP) roles and scope of practice. All studies reported that GHP address family communication with patients, but their practices were heterogeneous and influenced by contextual factors. Practices to address family communication included providing guidance to inform the family (<i>n</i> = 19), materials to support communication (<i>n</i> = 16), psychosocial assessment (<i>n</i> = 11), and additional support (<i>n</i> = 18). Our findings suggest that the approach to family communication in GC draws on both teaching and counseling models, although with greater emphasis on the former. This is consistent with integrated models of GC. Future prospective process studies using observational data could enhance our understanding of patient-professional interactions and their influence on patient decision-making regarding family communication of genetic information.</p>","PeriodicalId":54829,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","volume":"34 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgc4.70067","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addressing family communication in genetic counseling: A scoping review of process studies\",\"authors\":\"Maria Barbosa,&nbsp;Milena Paneque,&nbsp;Sofia Fontoura Dias,&nbsp;Filipa Júlio,&nbsp;Jorge Sequeiros,&nbsp;Liliana Sousa,&nbsp;Angus Clarke,&nbsp;Alison Metcalfe,&nbsp;Célia M. D. Sales,&nbsp;Álvaro Mendes\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jgc4.70067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Process studies explore the content and dynamics established during genetic counseling (GC), allowing a greater understanding of what happens. No literature review has specifically examined how family communication of genetic information has been addressed in GC process studies. To fill this gap, a scoping review was conducted. Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and PsycInfo were searched, resulting in 21 articles for analysis. Most studies were retrospective (<i>n</i> = 19) and qualitative (<i>n</i> = 15) and involved hereditary cancer syndromes (<i>n =</i> 13). Studies analyzed how family communication of genetic information is addressed in GC by either focusing on patients' experiences and perspectives, or genetic healthcare professionals' (GHP) roles and scope of practice. All studies reported that GHP address family communication with patients, but their practices were heterogeneous and influenced by contextual factors. Practices to address family communication included providing guidance to inform the family (<i>n</i> = 19), materials to support communication (<i>n</i> = 16), psychosocial assessment (<i>n</i> = 11), and additional support (<i>n</i> = 18). Our findings suggest that the approach to family communication in GC draws on both teaching and counseling models, although with greater emphasis on the former. This is consistent with integrated models of GC. Future prospective process studies using observational data could enhance our understanding of patient-professional interactions and their influence on patient decision-making regarding family communication of genetic information.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Genetic Counseling\",\"volume\":\"34 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgc4.70067\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Genetic Counseling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgc4.70067\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgc4.70067","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

过程研究探索遗传咨询(GC)期间建立的内容和动态,从而更好地了解发生了什么。没有文献综述专门研究了遗传信息的家族传播如何在GC过程研究中得到解决。为了填补这一空白,进行了范围审查。我们检索了Scopus、Web of Science、PubMed和PsycInfo,结果有21篇文章可供分析。大多数研究是回顾性的(n = 19)和定性的(n = 15),涉及遗传性癌症综合征(n = 13)。研究通过关注患者的经验和观点,或遗传保健专业人员(GHP)的角色和实践范围,分析了遗传信息的家庭沟通如何在GC中得到解决。所有研究都报告了GHP与患者的家庭沟通,但他们的做法是异质的,并受到环境因素的影响。处理家庭沟通的做法包括提供指导以告知家庭(n = 19),提供材料以支持沟通(n = 16),提供社会心理评估(n = 11)和额外支持(n = 18)。我们的研究结果表明,GC的家庭沟通方法借鉴了教学和咨询两种模式,尽管前者更强调前者。这与GC的综合模型一致。未来使用观察数据的前瞻性过程研究可以增强我们对患者-专业互动及其对患者关于遗传信息家庭交流决策的影响的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Addressing family communication in genetic counseling: A scoping review of process studies

Addressing family communication in genetic counseling: A scoping review of process studies

Process studies explore the content and dynamics established during genetic counseling (GC), allowing a greater understanding of what happens. No literature review has specifically examined how family communication of genetic information has been addressed in GC process studies. To fill this gap, a scoping review was conducted. Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and PsycInfo were searched, resulting in 21 articles for analysis. Most studies were retrospective (n = 19) and qualitative (n = 15) and involved hereditary cancer syndromes (n = 13). Studies analyzed how family communication of genetic information is addressed in GC by either focusing on patients' experiences and perspectives, or genetic healthcare professionals' (GHP) roles and scope of practice. All studies reported that GHP address family communication with patients, but their practices were heterogeneous and influenced by contextual factors. Practices to address family communication included providing guidance to inform the family (n = 19), materials to support communication (n = 16), psychosocial assessment (n = 11), and additional support (n = 18). Our findings suggest that the approach to family communication in GC draws on both teaching and counseling models, although with greater emphasis on the former. This is consistent with integrated models of GC. Future prospective process studies using observational data could enhance our understanding of patient-professional interactions and their influence on patient decision-making regarding family communication of genetic information.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Journal of Genetic Counseling GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
26.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Genetic Counseling (JOGC), published for the National Society of Genetic Counselors, is a timely, international forum addressing all aspects of the discipline and practice of genetic counseling. The journal focuses on the critical questions and problems that arise at the interface between rapidly advancing technological developments and the concerns of individuals and communities at genetic risk. The publication provides genetic counselors, other clinicians and health educators, laboratory geneticists, bioethicists, legal scholars, social scientists, and other researchers with a premier resource on genetic counseling topics in national, international, and cross-national contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信