国际高级执业护士整合政策干预分类:一项10国名义群体共识技术研究

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Joshua Porat-Dahlerbruch, Tatyana Miller, Jocelyn Boyd, Moriah E. Ellen, Rebecca R. S. Clark
{"title":"国际高级执业护士整合政策干预分类:一项10国名义群体共识技术研究","authors":"Joshua Porat-Dahlerbruch,&nbsp;Tatyana Miller,&nbsp;Jocelyn Boyd,&nbsp;Moriah E. Ellen,&nbsp;Rebecca R. S. Clark","doi":"10.1111/inr.70096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To develop an international taxonomy of policy interventions for integrating advanced practice nurses into health systems.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Advanced practice nurse integration is the extent to which advanced practice nurses can function to the full extent of their education and scope of practice and contribute to better outcomes. Several barriers to integration are common across countries, such as an ill-defined scope of practice, lacking leadership engagement, and insufficient knowledge of the role. Barriers are attributed to a dearth of knowledge on evidence-based policy interventions guiding integration.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This was a nominal group expert consensus study with participants from multiple countries. Participants were divided into three meetings consisting of silent review of a preliminary taxonomy developed from a literature review and single-country testing, round-robin feedback, live revisions, and consensus voting. Each meeting resulted in a unique taxonomy, which researchers synthesized into one version. The synthesized taxonomy was sent for member checking and final consensus voting. The Accurate Consensus Reporting Document was used.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There were 12 experts representing 10 countries. Fifty-nine policy interventions were mapped to 14 categories. National-level categories included regulation, economic incentives, stakeholder cooperation, education and workforce development, marketing, and research. Organizational interventions included organizational guidelines, infrastructure development and resource allocation, interprofessional leadership engagement, and organizational messaging. Care team–level interventions included interprofessional experience/exposure, team communication, work environment, and research opportunities.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>This taxonomy builds on prior research by including participants across countries with varying health system governance, wealth, and advanced practice development.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Applying this taxonomy may contribute to more efficacious advanced practice nursing integration and potentially improve outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>A guide for adapting interventions to a health system, organization, or care team is included.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":54931,"journal":{"name":"International Nursing Review","volume":"72 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/inr.70096","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The International Advanced Practice Nurse Integration Policy Intervention Taxonomy: A 10-Country Nominal Group Consensus Technique Study\",\"authors\":\"Joshua Porat-Dahlerbruch,&nbsp;Tatyana Miller,&nbsp;Jocelyn Boyd,&nbsp;Moriah E. Ellen,&nbsp;Rebecca R. S. Clark\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/inr.70096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>To develop an international taxonomy of policy interventions for integrating advanced practice nurses into health systems.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Advanced practice nurse integration is the extent to which advanced practice nurses can function to the full extent of their education and scope of practice and contribute to better outcomes. Several barriers to integration are common across countries, such as an ill-defined scope of practice, lacking leadership engagement, and insufficient knowledge of the role. Barriers are attributed to a dearth of knowledge on evidence-based policy interventions guiding integration.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This was a nominal group expert consensus study with participants from multiple countries. Participants were divided into three meetings consisting of silent review of a preliminary taxonomy developed from a literature review and single-country testing, round-robin feedback, live revisions, and consensus voting. Each meeting resulted in a unique taxonomy, which researchers synthesized into one version. The synthesized taxonomy was sent for member checking and final consensus voting. The Accurate Consensus Reporting Document was used.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>There were 12 experts representing 10 countries. Fifty-nine policy interventions were mapped to 14 categories. National-level categories included regulation, economic incentives, stakeholder cooperation, education and workforce development, marketing, and research. Organizational interventions included organizational guidelines, infrastructure development and resource allocation, interprofessional leadership engagement, and organizational messaging. Care team–level interventions included interprofessional experience/exposure, team communication, work environment, and research opportunities.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>This taxonomy builds on prior research by including participants across countries with varying health system governance, wealth, and advanced practice development.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Applying this taxonomy may contribute to more efficacious advanced practice nursing integration and potentially improve outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Implications</h3>\\n \\n <p>A guide for adapting interventions to a health system, organization, or care team is included.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54931,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Nursing Review\",\"volume\":\"72 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/inr.70096\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Nursing Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/inr.70096\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Nursing Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/inr.70096","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:为将高级执业护士纳入卫生系统制定一套国际政策干预分类法。高级执业护士整合是指高级执业护士能够充分发挥其教育和实践范围的作用并为更好的结果做出贡献的程度。整合的几个障碍在各国都很普遍,例如实践范围不明确、缺乏领导参与以及对角色的认识不足。障碍是由于缺乏关于指导一体化的循证政策干预措施的知识。方法这是一个名义上的小组专家共识研究,参与者来自多个国家。参与者被分为三个会议,包括对从文献回顾和单一国家测试中制定的初步分类进行沉默审查,循环反馈,实时修订和协商一致投票。每次会议都产生了一个独特的分类,研究人员将其合成为一个版本。将合成的分类法发送给成员检查和最终的共识投票。采用了准确共识报告文件。结果共有12名专家代表10个国家。59项政策干预被划分为14类。国家层面的分类包括监管、经济激励、利益相关者合作、教育和劳动力发展、营销和研究。组织干预包括组织指导方针、基础设施开发和资源分配、跨专业领导参与和组织信息传递。护理团队层面的干预包括跨专业经验/接触、团队沟通、工作环境和研究机会。该分类法建立在先前研究的基础上,纳入了具有不同卫生系统治理、财富和先进实践发展的国家的参与者。结论应用该分类方法可有效整合高级护理实践,提高临床疗效。本文包括了一份使干预措施适应卫生系统、组织或护理团队的指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The International Advanced Practice Nurse Integration Policy Intervention Taxonomy: A 10-Country Nominal Group Consensus Technique Study

The International Advanced Practice Nurse Integration Policy Intervention Taxonomy: A 10-Country Nominal Group Consensus Technique Study

Aim

To develop an international taxonomy of policy interventions for integrating advanced practice nurses into health systems.

Background

Advanced practice nurse integration is the extent to which advanced practice nurses can function to the full extent of their education and scope of practice and contribute to better outcomes. Several barriers to integration are common across countries, such as an ill-defined scope of practice, lacking leadership engagement, and insufficient knowledge of the role. Barriers are attributed to a dearth of knowledge on evidence-based policy interventions guiding integration.

Methods

This was a nominal group expert consensus study with participants from multiple countries. Participants were divided into three meetings consisting of silent review of a preliminary taxonomy developed from a literature review and single-country testing, round-robin feedback, live revisions, and consensus voting. Each meeting resulted in a unique taxonomy, which researchers synthesized into one version. The synthesized taxonomy was sent for member checking and final consensus voting. The Accurate Consensus Reporting Document was used.

Results

There were 12 experts representing 10 countries. Fifty-nine policy interventions were mapped to 14 categories. National-level categories included regulation, economic incentives, stakeholder cooperation, education and workforce development, marketing, and research. Organizational interventions included organizational guidelines, infrastructure development and resource allocation, interprofessional leadership engagement, and organizational messaging. Care team–level interventions included interprofessional experience/exposure, team communication, work environment, and research opportunities.

Discussion

This taxonomy builds on prior research by including participants across countries with varying health system governance, wealth, and advanced practice development.

Conclusion

Applying this taxonomy may contribute to more efficacious advanced practice nursing integration and potentially improve outcomes.

Implications

A guide for adapting interventions to a health system, organization, or care team is included.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
7.30%
发文量
72
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Nursing Review is a key resource for nurses world-wide. Articles are encouraged that reflect the ICN"s five key values: flexibility, inclusiveness, partnership, achievement and visionary leadership. Authors are encouraged to identify the relevance of local issues for the global community and to describe their work and to document their experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信