同伴支持的框架:前列腺癌患者对同伴支持的认知

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Laura Lahti, Eeva Harju, Annastiina Hakulinen, Marjaana Jones, Teemu J. Murtola, Ilkka Pietilä, Suvi Holmberg
{"title":"同伴支持的框架:前列腺癌患者对同伴支持的认知","authors":"Laura Lahti,&nbsp;Eeva Harju,&nbsp;Annastiina Hakulinen,&nbsp;Marjaana Jones,&nbsp;Teemu J. Murtola,&nbsp;Ilkka Pietilä,&nbsp;Suvi Holmberg","doi":"10.1155/hsc/9408124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Prostate cancer significantly impacts the lives of those diagnosed, causing emotional and psychological distress, including fear, uncertainty, and anxiety. While formal peer support has been suggested as a beneficial way for men to share their experiences, little is known about the perspectives of those who choose not to participate in such activities. This study aims to explore how those men with prostate cancer who have not engaged in formal peer support perceive and describe peer support before and after participating in a supervised exercise group. This study is part of an exercise intervention research project involving men diagnosed with prostate cancer. The data consists of the individual interviews of 15 men in an intervention group who participated in supervised gym sessions with peers. The intervention did not include formal, institutionally organised peer support. Semistructured interviews were conducted three times: before, immediately after and 3 months after the group exercises. The interviews were analysed using frame analysis. The participants described peer support through five distinct frames: taking distance and highlighting individuality, existing social networks, daily activities, extended peer support, and fellowship and voluntary sharing. Before exercising in the group, the participants had often distanced themselves from formal peer support, emphasised their ability to cope independently and relied on existing social networks. After the group exercises, they still viewed formal peer support negatively but nonetheless perceived the exercise group as a low-threshold meeting place where informal peer support occurred naturally through shared activities. The study suggests that while formal peer support may not appeal to all men with prostate cancer, alternative models that incorporate shared activities and informal interactions can provide meaningful support. These findings highlight the importance of tailoring peer support options to accommodate diverse needs and preferences, potentially improving the well-being of men with prostate cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":48195,"journal":{"name":"Health & Social Care in the Community","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/hsc/9408124","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frames of Peer Support: Perceptions of Peer Support Among Men With Prostate Cancer\",\"authors\":\"Laura Lahti,&nbsp;Eeva Harju,&nbsp;Annastiina Hakulinen,&nbsp;Marjaana Jones,&nbsp;Teemu J. Murtola,&nbsp;Ilkka Pietilä,&nbsp;Suvi Holmberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/hsc/9408124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Prostate cancer significantly impacts the lives of those diagnosed, causing emotional and psychological distress, including fear, uncertainty, and anxiety. While formal peer support has been suggested as a beneficial way for men to share their experiences, little is known about the perspectives of those who choose not to participate in such activities. This study aims to explore how those men with prostate cancer who have not engaged in formal peer support perceive and describe peer support before and after participating in a supervised exercise group. This study is part of an exercise intervention research project involving men diagnosed with prostate cancer. The data consists of the individual interviews of 15 men in an intervention group who participated in supervised gym sessions with peers. The intervention did not include formal, institutionally organised peer support. Semistructured interviews were conducted three times: before, immediately after and 3 months after the group exercises. The interviews were analysed using frame analysis. The participants described peer support through five distinct frames: taking distance and highlighting individuality, existing social networks, daily activities, extended peer support, and fellowship and voluntary sharing. Before exercising in the group, the participants had often distanced themselves from formal peer support, emphasised their ability to cope independently and relied on existing social networks. After the group exercises, they still viewed formal peer support negatively but nonetheless perceived the exercise group as a low-threshold meeting place where informal peer support occurred naturally through shared activities. The study suggests that while formal peer support may not appeal to all men with prostate cancer, alternative models that incorporate shared activities and informal interactions can provide meaningful support. These findings highlight the importance of tailoring peer support options to accommodate diverse needs and preferences, potentially improving the well-being of men with prostate cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health & Social Care in the Community\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/hsc/9408124\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health & Social Care in the Community\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/hsc/9408124\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health & Social Care in the Community","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/hsc/9408124","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前列腺癌严重影响患者的生活,造成情绪和心理困扰,包括恐惧、不确定和焦虑。虽然正式的同伴支持被认为是男性分享经验的有益方式,但人们对那些选择不参加此类活动的人的观点知之甚少。本研究旨在探讨未参加正式同伴支持的前列腺癌患者在参加有监督的锻炼小组前后如何感知和描述同伴支持。这项研究是一项运动干预研究项目的一部分,该项目涉及被诊断患有前列腺癌的男性。这些数据包括对干预组中15名男性的个人访谈,他们与同龄人一起参加了有监督的健身课程。干预不包括正式的、制度性的同伴支持。半结构化访谈进行了三次:小组练习前、小组练习后和小组练习后三个月。采用框架分析法对访谈进行分析。参与者通过五个不同的框架描述同伴支持:保持距离和突出个性、现有的社会网络、日常活动、扩展同伴支持、友谊和自愿分享。在集体锻炼之前,参与者通常会远离正式的同伴支持,强调自己独立应对的能力,并依赖现有的社交网络。在小组练习之后,他们仍然对正式的同伴支持持消极态度,但仍然认为锻炼小组是一个低门槛的会议场所,通过共同的活动自然地产生非正式的同伴支持。该研究表明,虽然正式的同伴支持可能不会吸引所有患有前列腺癌的男性,但结合共同活动和非正式互动的替代模式可以提供有意义的支持。这些发现强调了定制同伴支持选择以适应不同需求和偏好的重要性,这可能会改善前列腺癌患者的健康状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Frames of Peer Support: Perceptions of Peer Support Among Men With Prostate Cancer

Prostate cancer significantly impacts the lives of those diagnosed, causing emotional and psychological distress, including fear, uncertainty, and anxiety. While formal peer support has been suggested as a beneficial way for men to share their experiences, little is known about the perspectives of those who choose not to participate in such activities. This study aims to explore how those men with prostate cancer who have not engaged in formal peer support perceive and describe peer support before and after participating in a supervised exercise group. This study is part of an exercise intervention research project involving men diagnosed with prostate cancer. The data consists of the individual interviews of 15 men in an intervention group who participated in supervised gym sessions with peers. The intervention did not include formal, institutionally organised peer support. Semistructured interviews were conducted three times: before, immediately after and 3 months after the group exercises. The interviews were analysed using frame analysis. The participants described peer support through five distinct frames: taking distance and highlighting individuality, existing social networks, daily activities, extended peer support, and fellowship and voluntary sharing. Before exercising in the group, the participants had often distanced themselves from formal peer support, emphasised their ability to cope independently and relied on existing social networks. After the group exercises, they still viewed formal peer support negatively but nonetheless perceived the exercise group as a low-threshold meeting place where informal peer support occurred naturally through shared activities. The study suggests that while formal peer support may not appeal to all men with prostate cancer, alternative models that incorporate shared activities and informal interactions can provide meaningful support. These findings highlight the importance of tailoring peer support options to accommodate diverse needs and preferences, potentially improving the well-being of men with prostate cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
423
期刊介绍: Health and Social Care in the community is an essential journal for anyone involved in nursing, social work, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, general practice, health psychology, health economy, primary health care and the promotion of health. It is an international peer-reviewed journal supporting interdisciplinary collaboration on policy and practice within health and social care in the community. The journal publishes: - Original research papers in all areas of health and social care - Topical health and social care review articles - Policy and practice evaluations - Book reviews - Special issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信