{"title":"认知优先级的决策架构:技术与社会交叉的机器学习","authors":"M.Z. Naser","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This review examines how machine learning (ML) methodologies are transforming the philosophy of science and engineering through five critical epistemic functions: Prediction, Explanation, Discovery, Understanding, and Decision-making (P.E.D.U.D.). We analyze each function individually and then provide examples of how ML applications embody these epistemic aims. Building on this analysis, we develop a framework to help users/practitioners determine which epistemic function to prioritize for specific problem domains by creating a decision architecture that aligns ML methodologies with epistemic goals. Finally, we explore the broader philosophical implications of this epistemological landscape by analyzing tensions between data-driven and theory-driven approaches and argue that ML necessitates a reconsideration of the traditional philosophy of science as the balance between these five functions evolves.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"83 ","pages":"Article 103039"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A decision architecture for epistemic prioritization: Machine learning at the intersection of technology and society\",\"authors\":\"M.Z. Naser\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This review examines how machine learning (ML) methodologies are transforming the philosophy of science and engineering through five critical epistemic functions: Prediction, Explanation, Discovery, Understanding, and Decision-making (P.E.D.U.D.). We analyze each function individually and then provide examples of how ML applications embody these epistemic aims. Building on this analysis, we develop a framework to help users/practitioners determine which epistemic function to prioritize for specific problem domains by creating a decision architecture that aligns ML methodologies with epistemic goals. Finally, we explore the broader philosophical implications of this epistemological landscape by analyzing tensions between data-driven and theory-driven approaches and argue that ML necessitates a reconsideration of the traditional philosophy of science as the balance between these five functions evolves.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology in Society\",\"volume\":\"83 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103039\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology in Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25002295\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL ISSUES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25002295","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
A decision architecture for epistemic prioritization: Machine learning at the intersection of technology and society
This review examines how machine learning (ML) methodologies are transforming the philosophy of science and engineering through five critical epistemic functions: Prediction, Explanation, Discovery, Understanding, and Decision-making (P.E.D.U.D.). We analyze each function individually and then provide examples of how ML applications embody these epistemic aims. Building on this analysis, we develop a framework to help users/practitioners determine which epistemic function to prioritize for specific problem domains by creating a decision architecture that aligns ML methodologies with epistemic goals. Finally, we explore the broader philosophical implications of this epistemological landscape by analyzing tensions between data-driven and theory-driven approaches and argue that ML necessitates a reconsideration of the traditional philosophy of science as the balance between these five functions evolves.
期刊介绍:
Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.