路线选择为老年行人导航系统设计和可达性分析提供信息:范围审查

IF 3.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Nir Fulman , Johannes Huber , Armağan Teke Lloyd , Kathrin Foshag , Yulia Grinblat , Umut Türk , Sven Lautenbach , Jan Amcoff , Marina Toger , Johanna Jokinen , Alexander Zipf
{"title":"路线选择为老年行人导航系统设计和可达性分析提供信息:范围审查","authors":"Nir Fulman ,&nbsp;Johannes Huber ,&nbsp;Armağan Teke Lloyd ,&nbsp;Kathrin Foshag ,&nbsp;Yulia Grinblat ,&nbsp;Umut Türk ,&nbsp;Sven Lautenbach ,&nbsp;Jan Amcoff ,&nbsp;Marina Toger ,&nbsp;Johanna Jokinen ,&nbsp;Alexander Zipf","doi":"10.1016/j.jth.2025.102151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Routing systems can support older adults by helping them overcome barriers to walking, promoting independence and well-being. The paths generated by these systems also inform urban accessibility metrics, such as those used in 15-min-city planning. Yet current systems rarely reflect the preferences or constraints of older pedestrians. Empirical studies of route choice can help close this gap by revealing how people trade off different route attributes in real settings.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a scoping review, following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, of empirical studies analyzing pedestrian route choice among adults. The goal was to identify findings that could inform the design of more age-inclusive routing tools.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria, eight of which focused exclusively on older adults. Despite varied contexts, three consistent themes emerged: (i) sidewalk quality and manageable gradients; (ii) aesthetic and sensory comfort, including greenery, low noise, and good lighting; and (iii) access to benches, transit, and everyday amenities. However, most studies relied on qualitative methods, limiting direct integration into routing algorithms.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Future work should prioritize hybrid qualitative-quantitative designs, large-scale sampling of routes, and fine-grained mapping of micro-barriers. Analyses should account for age, gender, and functional ability, and consider circular leisure walks as a distinct travel pattern. These directions can enhance the usability and equity of routing systems and urban planning frameworks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport & Health","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article 102151"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Route choice to inform navigation system design and accessibility analysis for older pedestrians: a scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Nir Fulman ,&nbsp;Johannes Huber ,&nbsp;Armağan Teke Lloyd ,&nbsp;Kathrin Foshag ,&nbsp;Yulia Grinblat ,&nbsp;Umut Türk ,&nbsp;Sven Lautenbach ,&nbsp;Jan Amcoff ,&nbsp;Marina Toger ,&nbsp;Johanna Jokinen ,&nbsp;Alexander Zipf\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jth.2025.102151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Routing systems can support older adults by helping them overcome barriers to walking, promoting independence and well-being. The paths generated by these systems also inform urban accessibility metrics, such as those used in 15-min-city planning. Yet current systems rarely reflect the preferences or constraints of older pedestrians. Empirical studies of route choice can help close this gap by revealing how people trade off different route attributes in real settings.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a scoping review, following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, of empirical studies analyzing pedestrian route choice among adults. The goal was to identify findings that could inform the design of more age-inclusive routing tools.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria, eight of which focused exclusively on older adults. Despite varied contexts, three consistent themes emerged: (i) sidewalk quality and manageable gradients; (ii) aesthetic and sensory comfort, including greenery, low noise, and good lighting; and (iii) access to benches, transit, and everyday amenities. However, most studies relied on qualitative methods, limiting direct integration into routing algorithms.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Future work should prioritize hybrid qualitative-quantitative designs, large-scale sampling of routes, and fine-grained mapping of micro-barriers. Analyses should account for age, gender, and functional ability, and consider circular leisure walks as a distinct travel pattern. These directions can enhance the usability and equity of routing systems and urban planning frameworks.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47838,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Transport & Health\",\"volume\":\"44 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102151\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Transport & Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140525001719\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140525001719","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

路线系统可以帮助老年人克服行走障碍,促进他们的独立性和幸福感。这些系统生成的路径还为城市可达性指标提供信息,例如在15分钟城市规划中使用的指标。然而,目前的系统很少反映老年行人的偏好或限制。路线选择的实证研究可以通过揭示人们如何在现实环境中权衡不同的路线属性来帮助缩小这一差距。方法根据PRISMA-ScR指南,对成人步行路径选择的实证研究进行了范围综述。我们的目标是确定可以为设计更适合年龄的路由工具提供信息的发现。结果6项研究符合纳入标准,其中8项专门针对老年人。尽管背景不同,但三个一致的主题出现了:(i)人行道质量和可管理的坡度;(ii)美观和感官上的舒适,包括绿化、低噪音和良好的照明;(iii)长凳、交通和日常设施的使用。然而,大多数研究依赖于定性方法,限制了直接集成到路由算法中。结论未来的工作应优先考虑混合的定性和定量设计,大规模的路线采样和细粒度的微屏障制图。分析应考虑到年龄、性别和功能能力,并将循环休闲步行作为一种独特的旅行模式。这些方向可以提高路线系统和城市规划框架的可用性和公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Route choice to inform navigation system design and accessibility analysis for older pedestrians: a scoping review

Introduction

Routing systems can support older adults by helping them overcome barriers to walking, promoting independence and well-being. The paths generated by these systems also inform urban accessibility metrics, such as those used in 15-min-city planning. Yet current systems rarely reflect the preferences or constraints of older pedestrians. Empirical studies of route choice can help close this gap by revealing how people trade off different route attributes in real settings.

Methods

We conducted a scoping review, following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, of empirical studies analyzing pedestrian route choice among adults. The goal was to identify findings that could inform the design of more age-inclusive routing tools.

Results

Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria, eight of which focused exclusively on older adults. Despite varied contexts, three consistent themes emerged: (i) sidewalk quality and manageable gradients; (ii) aesthetic and sensory comfort, including greenery, low noise, and good lighting; and (iii) access to benches, transit, and everyday amenities. However, most studies relied on qualitative methods, limiting direct integration into routing algorithms.

Conclusions

Future work should prioritize hybrid qualitative-quantitative designs, large-scale sampling of routes, and fine-grained mapping of micro-barriers. Analyses should account for age, gender, and functional ability, and consider circular leisure walks as a distinct travel pattern. These directions can enhance the usability and equity of routing systems and urban planning frameworks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
69 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信