基于机器学习的中子辐照和非辐照RAFM钢低周疲劳寿命预测

IF 2 3区 工程技术 Q1 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Hussein Zahran , Aleksandr Zinovev , Dmitry Terentyev , Ali Aouf , Magd Abdel Wahab
{"title":"基于机器学习的中子辐照和非辐照RAFM钢低周疲劳寿命预测","authors":"Hussein Zahran ,&nbsp;Aleksandr Zinovev ,&nbsp;Dmitry Terentyev ,&nbsp;Ali Aouf ,&nbsp;Magd Abdel Wahab","doi":"10.1016/j.fusengdes.2025.115394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>EUROFER97 and other Reduced Activation Ferritic-Martensitic (RAFM) steels are candidate structural materials for fusion reactors. Qualification of these steels requires the assessment of their performance under fatigue loading especially after exposure to neutron irradiation. However, the significantly high costs and engineering complexity of performing such tests make the experiments on irradiated material difficult. Therefore, alternative methods to predict the fatigue life of RAFM steels are deemed beneficial. In this study, machine learning was used to predict the fatigue life of irradiated and non-irradiated RAFM steels utilizing published experimental data. Four algorithms were benchmarked: Random Forest Regression (RF), Support Vector Regressor (SVR), Gradient Boosted Regressor (GBR), and MultiLayer Perceptron (MLP). Predictions were made based on two scenarios: one scenario with yield strength as input along with the fatigue test condition, and the second scenario without the yield strength. The results showed that RF and GBR were the best performing algorithms, with <em>R</em><sup>2</sup> score between 0.9522 and 0.9696 on the training set and between 0.9058 and 0.9249 on the validation set. The Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) score was between 0.3 and 0.43 % on the training set and 0.7 and 1.2 % on the validation set. The quality of prediction of fatigue life without using the yield strength was shown to be almost equal to that in the first scenario. SHAP analysis revealed that strain range was the most influential input feature, while GBR showed greater sensitivity to secondary features such as temperature and diameter. GBR also captured more nuanced interactions between input variables, particularly in irradiated datasets, confirming its superior ability to model complex fatigue behaviour. The ability of these algorithms to predict the fatigue life corresponding to test conditions not used for training was checked using 15 % of the collected database as a prediction set, which included fatigue life of irradiated materials. Results indicated that these algorithms were able to predict the fatigue life of this set with 83-87 % of the points lying within the factor of two from the experimental value.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55133,"journal":{"name":"Fusion Engineering and Design","volume":"221 ","pages":"Article 115394"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low cycle fatigue life prediction for neutron-irradiated and nonirradiated RAFM steels via machine learning\",\"authors\":\"Hussein Zahran ,&nbsp;Aleksandr Zinovev ,&nbsp;Dmitry Terentyev ,&nbsp;Ali Aouf ,&nbsp;Magd Abdel Wahab\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fusengdes.2025.115394\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>EUROFER97 and other Reduced Activation Ferritic-Martensitic (RAFM) steels are candidate structural materials for fusion reactors. Qualification of these steels requires the assessment of their performance under fatigue loading especially after exposure to neutron irradiation. However, the significantly high costs and engineering complexity of performing such tests make the experiments on irradiated material difficult. Therefore, alternative methods to predict the fatigue life of RAFM steels are deemed beneficial. In this study, machine learning was used to predict the fatigue life of irradiated and non-irradiated RAFM steels utilizing published experimental data. Four algorithms were benchmarked: Random Forest Regression (RF), Support Vector Regressor (SVR), Gradient Boosted Regressor (GBR), and MultiLayer Perceptron (MLP). Predictions were made based on two scenarios: one scenario with yield strength as input along with the fatigue test condition, and the second scenario without the yield strength. The results showed that RF and GBR were the best performing algorithms, with <em>R</em><sup>2</sup> score between 0.9522 and 0.9696 on the training set and between 0.9058 and 0.9249 on the validation set. The Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) score was between 0.3 and 0.43 % on the training set and 0.7 and 1.2 % on the validation set. The quality of prediction of fatigue life without using the yield strength was shown to be almost equal to that in the first scenario. SHAP analysis revealed that strain range was the most influential input feature, while GBR showed greater sensitivity to secondary features such as temperature and diameter. GBR also captured more nuanced interactions between input variables, particularly in irradiated datasets, confirming its superior ability to model complex fatigue behaviour. The ability of these algorithms to predict the fatigue life corresponding to test conditions not used for training was checked using 15 % of the collected database as a prediction set, which included fatigue life of irradiated materials. Results indicated that these algorithms were able to predict the fatigue life of this set with 83-87 % of the points lying within the factor of two from the experimental value.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fusion Engineering and Design\",\"volume\":\"221 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115394\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fusion Engineering and Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920379625005903\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fusion Engineering and Design","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920379625005903","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

EUROFER97和其他低活化铁素体-马氏体(RAFM)钢是聚变反应堆的候选结构材料。这些钢的鉴定需要评估其在疲劳载荷下的性能,特别是暴露于中子辐照后的性能。然而,执行这种测试的高成本和工程复杂性使得在辐照材料上进行实验变得困难。因此,预测RAFM钢疲劳寿命的替代方法被认为是有益的。在这项研究中,利用已发表的实验数据,机器学习被用来预测辐照和未辐照RAFM钢的疲劳寿命。对四种算法进行基准测试:随机森林回归(RF)、支持向量回归(SVR)、梯度增强回归(GBR)和多层感知器(MLP)。基于两种情景进行预测:一种情景以屈服强度和疲劳试验条件为输入,另一种情景不以屈服强度为输入。结果表明,RF和GBR是表现最好的算法,训练集的R2得分在0.9522 ~ 0.9696之间,验证集的R2得分在0.9058 ~ 0.9249之间。训练集的平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)得分在0.3 - 0.43%之间,验证集的平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)得分在0.7 - 1.2%之间。结果表明,在不使用屈服强度的情况下,疲劳寿命预测的质量与第一种情况几乎相等。SHAP分析表明,应变范围是影响最大的输入特征,而GBR对温度和直径等次要特征更敏感。GBR还捕获了输入变量之间更细微的相互作用,特别是在辐照数据集中,证实了其模拟复杂疲劳行为的优越能力。使用收集的数据库的15%作为预测集(包括辐照材料的疲劳寿命)来检查这些算法预测非用于训练的测试条件对应的疲劳寿命的能力。结果表明,这些算法能够预测出该装置的疲劳寿命,其中83% ~ 87%的点与实验值在2的因子范围内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Low cycle fatigue life prediction for neutron-irradiated and nonirradiated RAFM steels via machine learning
EUROFER97 and other Reduced Activation Ferritic-Martensitic (RAFM) steels are candidate structural materials for fusion reactors. Qualification of these steels requires the assessment of their performance under fatigue loading especially after exposure to neutron irradiation. However, the significantly high costs and engineering complexity of performing such tests make the experiments on irradiated material difficult. Therefore, alternative methods to predict the fatigue life of RAFM steels are deemed beneficial. In this study, machine learning was used to predict the fatigue life of irradiated and non-irradiated RAFM steels utilizing published experimental data. Four algorithms were benchmarked: Random Forest Regression (RF), Support Vector Regressor (SVR), Gradient Boosted Regressor (GBR), and MultiLayer Perceptron (MLP). Predictions were made based on two scenarios: one scenario with yield strength as input along with the fatigue test condition, and the second scenario without the yield strength. The results showed that RF and GBR were the best performing algorithms, with R2 score between 0.9522 and 0.9696 on the training set and between 0.9058 and 0.9249 on the validation set. The Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) score was between 0.3 and 0.43 % on the training set and 0.7 and 1.2 % on the validation set. The quality of prediction of fatigue life without using the yield strength was shown to be almost equal to that in the first scenario. SHAP analysis revealed that strain range was the most influential input feature, while GBR showed greater sensitivity to secondary features such as temperature and diameter. GBR also captured more nuanced interactions between input variables, particularly in irradiated datasets, confirming its superior ability to model complex fatigue behaviour. The ability of these algorithms to predict the fatigue life corresponding to test conditions not used for training was checked using 15 % of the collected database as a prediction set, which included fatigue life of irradiated materials. Results indicated that these algorithms were able to predict the fatigue life of this set with 83-87 % of the points lying within the factor of two from the experimental value.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fusion Engineering and Design
Fusion Engineering and Design 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
23.50%
发文量
275
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: The journal accepts papers about experiments (both plasma and technology), theory, models, methods, and designs in areas relating to technology, engineering, and applied science aspects of magnetic and inertial fusion energy. Specific areas of interest include: MFE and IFE design studies for experiments and reactors; fusion nuclear technologies and materials, including blankets and shields; analysis of reactor plasmas; plasma heating, fuelling, and vacuum systems; drivers, targets, and special technologies for IFE, controls and diagnostics; fuel cycle analysis and tritium reprocessing and handling; operations and remote maintenance of reactors; safety, decommissioning, and waste management; economic and environmental analysis of components and systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信