Özge Aygül , Teodor Hellgren , Shima Azizi , Andrew C. Trapp
{"title":"面向高校战略规模化的动态课程排课预测与规范框架","authors":"Özge Aygül , Teodor Hellgren , Shima Azizi , Andrew C. Trapp","doi":"10.1016/j.omega.2025.103406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Universities play vital roles in educating current and future generations. Universities that intend to survive in competitive academic markets where there are evolving enrollment trends must responsibly manage resources. Planning processes for instructional spaces can benefit from optimization and lead to more effective resource utilization, yet the use of trends in major and course demands to inform long-term planning remains largely unexplored. We propose a novel mathematical optimization framework that appears to be the first to use trend predictions to guide long-term dynamic course scheduling decisions and effective resource allocation. We begin with a baseline formulation that assigns course sections to time patterns and classroom spaces while considering instructor preferences, as well as constraints related to conflicts and capacity. We then extend this to a dynamic formulation that addresses bottleneck courses while prioritizing classroom utilization and honoring instructor preferences. Our dynamic formulation optimizes instructional space allocation for an academic period over the entire university, and solving for sequential independent academic periods reveals valuable insights into the efficiency of physical resource utilization on the horizon. Our framework is flexible, accommodating the objectives of faculty, schedulers, and administrators through a hierarchical multi-objective approach that integrates these diverse priorities. Our formulation addresses 76% and 81% of bottleneck sections for back-to-back semesters, with a substantial number of unutilized locations that could potentially be repurposed to accommodate the remaining bottleneck sections or other purposes. Through extensive experiments with varying university enrollment scenarios, we examine the resulting tradeoffs among objectives and highlight a variety of implications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19529,"journal":{"name":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","volume":"138 ","pages":"Article 103406"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A predict-and-prescribe framework for dynamic course scheduling toward strategic university scaling\",\"authors\":\"Özge Aygül , Teodor Hellgren , Shima Azizi , Andrew C. Trapp\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.omega.2025.103406\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Universities play vital roles in educating current and future generations. Universities that intend to survive in competitive academic markets where there are evolving enrollment trends must responsibly manage resources. Planning processes for instructional spaces can benefit from optimization and lead to more effective resource utilization, yet the use of trends in major and course demands to inform long-term planning remains largely unexplored. We propose a novel mathematical optimization framework that appears to be the first to use trend predictions to guide long-term dynamic course scheduling decisions and effective resource allocation. We begin with a baseline formulation that assigns course sections to time patterns and classroom spaces while considering instructor preferences, as well as constraints related to conflicts and capacity. We then extend this to a dynamic formulation that addresses bottleneck courses while prioritizing classroom utilization and honoring instructor preferences. Our dynamic formulation optimizes instructional space allocation for an academic period over the entire university, and solving for sequential independent academic periods reveals valuable insights into the efficiency of physical resource utilization on the horizon. Our framework is flexible, accommodating the objectives of faculty, schedulers, and administrators through a hierarchical multi-objective approach that integrates these diverse priorities. Our formulation addresses 76% and 81% of bottleneck sections for back-to-back semesters, with a substantial number of unutilized locations that could potentially be repurposed to accommodate the remaining bottleneck sections or other purposes. Through extensive experiments with varying university enrollment scenarios, we examine the resulting tradeoffs among objectives and highlight a variety of implications.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Omega-international Journal of Management Science\",\"volume\":\"138 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103406\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Omega-international Journal of Management Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030504832500132X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030504832500132X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
A predict-and-prescribe framework for dynamic course scheduling toward strategic university scaling
Universities play vital roles in educating current and future generations. Universities that intend to survive in competitive academic markets where there are evolving enrollment trends must responsibly manage resources. Planning processes for instructional spaces can benefit from optimization and lead to more effective resource utilization, yet the use of trends in major and course demands to inform long-term planning remains largely unexplored. We propose a novel mathematical optimization framework that appears to be the first to use trend predictions to guide long-term dynamic course scheduling decisions and effective resource allocation. We begin with a baseline formulation that assigns course sections to time patterns and classroom spaces while considering instructor preferences, as well as constraints related to conflicts and capacity. We then extend this to a dynamic formulation that addresses bottleneck courses while prioritizing classroom utilization and honoring instructor preferences. Our dynamic formulation optimizes instructional space allocation for an academic period over the entire university, and solving for sequential independent academic periods reveals valuable insights into the efficiency of physical resource utilization on the horizon. Our framework is flexible, accommodating the objectives of faculty, schedulers, and administrators through a hierarchical multi-objective approach that integrates these diverse priorities. Our formulation addresses 76% and 81% of bottleneck sections for back-to-back semesters, with a substantial number of unutilized locations that could potentially be repurposed to accommodate the remaining bottleneck sections or other purposes. Through extensive experiments with varying university enrollment scenarios, we examine the resulting tradeoffs among objectives and highlight a variety of implications.
期刊介绍:
Omega reports on developments in management, including the latest research results and applications. Original contributions and review articles describe the state of the art in specific fields or functions of management, while there are shorter critical assessments of particular management techniques. Other features of the journal are the "Memoranda" section for short communications and "Feedback", a correspondence column. Omega is both stimulating reading and an important source for practising managers, specialists in management services, operational research workers and management scientists, management consultants, academics, students and research personnel throughout the world. The material published is of high quality and relevance, written in a manner which makes it accessible to all of this wide-ranging readership. Preference will be given to papers with implications to the practice of management. Submissions of purely theoretical papers are discouraged. The review of material for publication in the journal reflects this aim.