基于增强模型选择的计算机断层数据去噪增强Noise2Inverse

Austin Yunker , Peter Kenesei , Hemant Sharma , Jun-Sang Park , Antonino Miceli , Rajkumar Kettimuthu
{"title":"基于增强模型选择的计算机断层数据去噪增强Noise2Inverse","authors":"Austin Yunker ,&nbsp;Peter Kenesei ,&nbsp;Hemant Sharma ,&nbsp;Jun-Sang Park ,&nbsp;Antonino Miceli ,&nbsp;Rajkumar Kettimuthu","doi":"10.1016/j.tmater.2025.100075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Synchrotron-based x-ray tomographic imaging enables the examination of the internal structure of materials at high spatial and temporal resolution. Experimental constraints can impose dose and time limits on the measurements, introducing a higher level of noise and artifacts in the reconstructed images. Deep learning has emerged as a powerful tool to remove noise from reconstructed images. Recently, the Noise2Inverse method was designed specifically for denoising reconstructed images without requiring paired noisy and clean images. This method creates multiple statistically independent reconstructions used to pair the data in which training involves transforming one reconstruction into the other, and vice versa. Originally designed to be used after a fixed number of epochs, we see in practice that this approach may not produce the optimal model and may unnecessarily waste computational resources. Therefore, we propose an alternative method of identifying the best model during training that aligns with the Noise2Inverse method. During validation, we compare the model output of the multiple reconstructions among each other. We hypothesize that the best model is the one that produces images with the highest similarity, implying a convergence in the predicted material properties and absorption values. To compare model outputs, we consider the absolute error, square error, structural similarity index (SSIM), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), and cosine similarity. We evaluate our method on two simulated tomography datasets and two, real-world, low-contrast, high-energy x-ray tomography datasets. We show our approach is more effective at determining the best model, up to an increase of 12.50% and 12.53% in SSIM and PSNR, respectively, while only requiring a fifth of the training time compared to the original approach.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101254,"journal":{"name":"Tomography of Materials and Structures","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100075"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Boosting Noise2Inverse via Enhanced Model Selection for Denoising Computed Tomography Data\",\"authors\":\"Austin Yunker ,&nbsp;Peter Kenesei ,&nbsp;Hemant Sharma ,&nbsp;Jun-Sang Park ,&nbsp;Antonino Miceli ,&nbsp;Rajkumar Kettimuthu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tmater.2025.100075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Synchrotron-based x-ray tomographic imaging enables the examination of the internal structure of materials at high spatial and temporal resolution. Experimental constraints can impose dose and time limits on the measurements, introducing a higher level of noise and artifacts in the reconstructed images. Deep learning has emerged as a powerful tool to remove noise from reconstructed images. Recently, the Noise2Inverse method was designed specifically for denoising reconstructed images without requiring paired noisy and clean images. This method creates multiple statistically independent reconstructions used to pair the data in which training involves transforming one reconstruction into the other, and vice versa. Originally designed to be used after a fixed number of epochs, we see in practice that this approach may not produce the optimal model and may unnecessarily waste computational resources. Therefore, we propose an alternative method of identifying the best model during training that aligns with the Noise2Inverse method. During validation, we compare the model output of the multiple reconstructions among each other. We hypothesize that the best model is the one that produces images with the highest similarity, implying a convergence in the predicted material properties and absorption values. To compare model outputs, we consider the absolute error, square error, structural similarity index (SSIM), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), and cosine similarity. We evaluate our method on two simulated tomography datasets and two, real-world, low-contrast, high-energy x-ray tomography datasets. We show our approach is more effective at determining the best model, up to an increase of 12.50% and 12.53% in SSIM and PSNR, respectively, while only requiring a fifth of the training time compared to the original approach.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tomography of Materials and Structures\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100075\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tomography of Materials and Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949673X25000282\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tomography of Materials and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949673X25000282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于同步加速器的x射线层析成像能够在高空间和时间分辨率下检查材料的内部结构。实验限制可能对测量施加剂量和时间限制,在重建图像中引入更高水平的噪声和伪影。深度学习已经成为从重建图像中去除噪声的强大工具。最近,Noise2Inverse方法被专门设计用于对重构图像进行去噪,而不需要对噪声图像和干净图像进行配对。该方法创建了多个统计独立的重建,用于配对数据,其中训练涉及将一个重建转换为另一个重建,反之亦然。最初的设计是在固定数量的epoch之后使用,我们在实践中看到,这种方法可能不会产生最优模型,并且可能不必要地浪费计算资源。因此,我们提出了一种替代方法,在训练过程中识别与Noise2Inverse方法一致的最佳模型。在验证过程中,我们比较了多次重建的模型输出。我们假设最好的模型是产生具有最高相似性的图像的模型,这意味着预测的材料特性和吸收值是收敛的。为了比较模型输出,我们考虑了绝对误差、平方误差、结构相似指数(SSIM)、峰值信噪比(PSNR)和余弦相似度。我们在两个模拟断层扫描数据集和两个真实世界的低对比度高能x射线断层扫描数据集上评估了我们的方法。我们表明,我们的方法在确定最佳模型方面更有效,SSIM和PSNR分别增加了12.50%和12.53%,而与原始方法相比,只需要五分之一的训练时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Boosting Noise2Inverse via Enhanced Model Selection for Denoising Computed Tomography Data
Synchrotron-based x-ray tomographic imaging enables the examination of the internal structure of materials at high spatial and temporal resolution. Experimental constraints can impose dose and time limits on the measurements, introducing a higher level of noise and artifacts in the reconstructed images. Deep learning has emerged as a powerful tool to remove noise from reconstructed images. Recently, the Noise2Inverse method was designed specifically for denoising reconstructed images without requiring paired noisy and clean images. This method creates multiple statistically independent reconstructions used to pair the data in which training involves transforming one reconstruction into the other, and vice versa. Originally designed to be used after a fixed number of epochs, we see in practice that this approach may not produce the optimal model and may unnecessarily waste computational resources. Therefore, we propose an alternative method of identifying the best model during training that aligns with the Noise2Inverse method. During validation, we compare the model output of the multiple reconstructions among each other. We hypothesize that the best model is the one that produces images with the highest similarity, implying a convergence in the predicted material properties and absorption values. To compare model outputs, we consider the absolute error, square error, structural similarity index (SSIM), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), and cosine similarity. We evaluate our method on two simulated tomography datasets and two, real-world, low-contrast, high-energy x-ray tomography datasets. We show our approach is more effective at determining the best model, up to an increase of 12.50% and 12.53% in SSIM and PSNR, respectively, while only requiring a fifth of the training time compared to the original approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信