在美国病理学院系的一个分支中,女性教员晋升为与男性教员相当的正教授

IF 1.3 Q3 PATHOLOGY
Debra G.B. Leonard MD, PhD , Melvin Limson PhD , Valerie A. Fitzhugh MD , Deniz Peker Barclift MD , Eileen A. Ryan MD
{"title":"在美国病理学院系的一个分支中,女性教员晋升为与男性教员相当的正教授","authors":"Debra G.B. Leonard MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Melvin Limson PhD ,&nbsp;Valerie A. Fitzhugh MD ,&nbsp;Deniz Peker Barclift MD ,&nbsp;Eileen A. Ryan MD","doi":"10.1016/j.acpath.2025.100215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Women faculty in academic medicine remain underrepresented at higher faculty ranks despite equal numbers of men and women medical students since 2003. This 2022 study asked if US academic pathology departments had achieved equity across academic rank for women faculty. The survey of 135 member departments of the Association for Academic Pathology requested data regarding chair characteristics, other department leaders’ number and gender, and faculty number and gender by academic rank and track. Sixty-four (47%) member departments responded. Twenty-three of the responding departments (36%) had equity of women and men full professors, defined as &lt;5% difference women and men full professors as a percentage of total faculty. Departments with professor gender equity more often had a woman chair (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01), and a higher percentage of women faculty (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05), women on the research tenure track (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01), and tenured women faculty (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01). Unstructured interviews with a subset of department chairs did not identify significant differences between departments with and without professor gender equity, except that equity was more driven by the intention of the chair (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01) and less by dean or institutional influence (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01). Over one third of US academic pathology departments responding to the survey have achieved equity for women and men full professors in current academic medicine institutions. This equity success for women is lost when looking at data by specialty or nationally, rather than by department.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":44927,"journal":{"name":"Academic Pathology","volume":"12 3","pages":"Article 100215"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Women faculty achieve promotion to full professor equivalent to men faculty in a subset of US academic pathology departments\",\"authors\":\"Debra G.B. Leonard MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Melvin Limson PhD ,&nbsp;Valerie A. Fitzhugh MD ,&nbsp;Deniz Peker Barclift MD ,&nbsp;Eileen A. Ryan MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acpath.2025.100215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Women faculty in academic medicine remain underrepresented at higher faculty ranks despite equal numbers of men and women medical students since 2003. This 2022 study asked if US academic pathology departments had achieved equity across academic rank for women faculty. The survey of 135 member departments of the Association for Academic Pathology requested data regarding chair characteristics, other department leaders’ number and gender, and faculty number and gender by academic rank and track. Sixty-four (47%) member departments responded. Twenty-three of the responding departments (36%) had equity of women and men full professors, defined as &lt;5% difference women and men full professors as a percentage of total faculty. Departments with professor gender equity more often had a woman chair (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01), and a higher percentage of women faculty (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05), women on the research tenure track (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01), and tenured women faculty (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01). Unstructured interviews with a subset of department chairs did not identify significant differences between departments with and without professor gender equity, except that equity was more driven by the intention of the chair (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01) and less by dean or institutional influence (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01). Over one third of US academic pathology departments responding to the survey have achieved equity for women and men full professors in current academic medicine institutions. This equity success for women is lost when looking at data by specialty or nationally, rather than by department.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Pathology\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100215\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2374289525000570\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2374289525000570","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管自2003年以来男女医科学生人数相等,但学术医学领域的女教员在高级教员队伍中的比例仍然不足。这项2022年的研究询问了美国学术病理学部门是否在女性教员的学术级别上实现了平等。对学术病理学协会135个成员部门的调查要求提供关于主席特征、其他部门领导人数和性别、教师人数和性别的学术等级和轨迹的数据。64个(47%)成员部门做出了回应。23个回应的院系(36%)拥有男女平等的正教授,定义为男女正教授占全体教员的百分比相差5%。教授性别平等的院系通常由女性担任主席(P <;0.01),女性教师比例更高(P <;0.05),研究终身职位的女性(P <;0.01),女性终身教授(P <;0.01)。对部分系主任进行的非结构化访谈并未发现有教授性别平等和没有教授性别平等的系主任之间存在显著差异,只是教授性别平等更多地受到系主任意图的推动(P <;0.01),院长或机构影响力的影响较小(P <;0.01)。在接受调查的美国病理学院系中,超过三分之一的院系在目前的学术医学机构中实现了男女正教授的平等。如果按专业或全国而不是按部门来分析数据,女性在平等方面取得的成功就会消失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Women faculty achieve promotion to full professor equivalent to men faculty in a subset of US academic pathology departments
Women faculty in academic medicine remain underrepresented at higher faculty ranks despite equal numbers of men and women medical students since 2003. This 2022 study asked if US academic pathology departments had achieved equity across academic rank for women faculty. The survey of 135 member departments of the Association for Academic Pathology requested data regarding chair characteristics, other department leaders’ number and gender, and faculty number and gender by academic rank and track. Sixty-four (47%) member departments responded. Twenty-three of the responding departments (36%) had equity of women and men full professors, defined as <5% difference women and men full professors as a percentage of total faculty. Departments with professor gender equity more often had a woman chair (P < 0.01), and a higher percentage of women faculty (P < 0.05), women on the research tenure track (P < 0.01), and tenured women faculty (P < 0.01). Unstructured interviews with a subset of department chairs did not identify significant differences between departments with and without professor gender equity, except that equity was more driven by the intention of the chair (P < 0.01) and less by dean or institutional influence (P < 0.01). Over one third of US academic pathology departments responding to the survey have achieved equity for women and men full professors in current academic medicine institutions. This equity success for women is lost when looking at data by specialty or nationally, rather than by department.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Pathology
Academic Pathology PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
20.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Pathology is an open access journal sponsored by the Association of Pathology Chairs, established to give voice to the innovations in leadership and management of academic departments of Pathology. These innovations may have impact across the breadth of pathology and laboratory medicine practice. Academic Pathology addresses methods for improving patient care (clinical informatics, genomic testing and data management, lab automation, electronic health record integration, and annotate biorepositories); best practices in inter-professional clinical partnerships; innovative pedagogical approaches to medical education and educational program evaluation in pathology; models for training academic pathologists and advancing academic career development; administrative and organizational models supporting the discipline; and leadership development in academic medical centers, health systems, and other relevant venues. Intended authorship and audiences for Academic Pathology are international and reach beyond academic pathology itself, including but not limited to healthcare providers, educators, researchers, and policy-makers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信