评估“吹、呼吸、咳嗽”健康促进干预对解决儿童中耳炎伴积液的影响:一项适应性随机对照试验方案

IF 1.4 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Jaimee R. Rich , Michael Dymock , Elke J. Seppanen , Elena Montgomery , Tanisha Cayley , Tamara Veselinović , Greta Bernabei , Anri Lester , Amy Hannigan , Nicole Irvine , Kerryn Gidgup , Edna Ninyette , Steph Bray , Tu Trang Tran , Valerie M. Swift , Melinda Edmunds , Natalie Strobel , Daniel McAullay , Julie Marsh , Evelyn Tay , Christopher G. Brennan-Jones
{"title":"评估“吹、呼吸、咳嗽”健康促进干预对解决儿童中耳炎伴积液的影响:一项适应性随机对照试验方案","authors":"Jaimee R. Rich ,&nbsp;Michael Dymock ,&nbsp;Elke J. Seppanen ,&nbsp;Elena Montgomery ,&nbsp;Tanisha Cayley ,&nbsp;Tamara Veselinović ,&nbsp;Greta Bernabei ,&nbsp;Anri Lester ,&nbsp;Amy Hannigan ,&nbsp;Nicole Irvine ,&nbsp;Kerryn Gidgup ,&nbsp;Edna Ninyette ,&nbsp;Steph Bray ,&nbsp;Tu Trang Tran ,&nbsp;Valerie M. Swift ,&nbsp;Melinda Edmunds ,&nbsp;Natalie Strobel ,&nbsp;Daniel McAullay ,&nbsp;Julie Marsh ,&nbsp;Evelyn Tay ,&nbsp;Christopher G. Brennan-Jones","doi":"10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Otitis media with effusion (OME) affects hearing, speech development, and quality of life (QoL) in children. The ‘Blow, Breathe, Cough’ (BBC) intervention promotes nasal, respiratory, and middle ear clearance through nose blowing, deep breathing, coughing, and hand hygiene. It shows promise in resolving OME but lacks randomized-controlled trial (RCT) evaluation. This paper presents a RCT protocol evaluating BBC's effect on OME resolution, hearing, speech, and QoL in children aged two to seven years.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This parallel-group, 1:1, outcome assessor-blinded, individual adaptive RCT investigates whether completing the BBC intervention plus hand hygiene twice-daily at home increases OME resolution after 4-to-6 weeks in children with OME, compared to hand hygiene alone. Families (n = 250) perform their individually randomized program (BBC plus hand hygiene, or hand hygiene only) at home. The primary outcome is the difference in OME resolution rates between trial arms, assessed using tympanometry (type B to A or C<sub>1</sub> transition) and otoscopy. Secondary outcomes include natural OME resolution, discharges from tertiary care, family satisfaction, hearing thresholds, QoL, bacterial load in the nasopharynx and on hands, cost comparison within the RCT versus standard care, and adverse events. All outcomes are measured by blinded researchers. An intention-to-treat analysis will be performed on all randomized participants. Guided by an Aboriginal Community Advisory Group, the RCT ensures culturally appropriate research whilst addressing community priorities in managing childhood ear disease.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>If efficacious, BBC could reform OME treatment, reduce costs, and improve long-term hearing, speech, and QoL outcomes in some children. Its accessibility offers a globally scalable solution.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37937,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","volume":"47 ","pages":"Article 101531"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the impact of the ‘Blow, Breathe, Cough’ health promotion intervention in resolving otitis media with effusion in children: An adaptive randomized-controlled trial protocol\",\"authors\":\"Jaimee R. Rich ,&nbsp;Michael Dymock ,&nbsp;Elke J. Seppanen ,&nbsp;Elena Montgomery ,&nbsp;Tanisha Cayley ,&nbsp;Tamara Veselinović ,&nbsp;Greta Bernabei ,&nbsp;Anri Lester ,&nbsp;Amy Hannigan ,&nbsp;Nicole Irvine ,&nbsp;Kerryn Gidgup ,&nbsp;Edna Ninyette ,&nbsp;Steph Bray ,&nbsp;Tu Trang Tran ,&nbsp;Valerie M. Swift ,&nbsp;Melinda Edmunds ,&nbsp;Natalie Strobel ,&nbsp;Daniel McAullay ,&nbsp;Julie Marsh ,&nbsp;Evelyn Tay ,&nbsp;Christopher G. Brennan-Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101531\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Otitis media with effusion (OME) affects hearing, speech development, and quality of life (QoL) in children. The ‘Blow, Breathe, Cough’ (BBC) intervention promotes nasal, respiratory, and middle ear clearance through nose blowing, deep breathing, coughing, and hand hygiene. It shows promise in resolving OME but lacks randomized-controlled trial (RCT) evaluation. This paper presents a RCT protocol evaluating BBC's effect on OME resolution, hearing, speech, and QoL in children aged two to seven years.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This parallel-group, 1:1, outcome assessor-blinded, individual adaptive RCT investigates whether completing the BBC intervention plus hand hygiene twice-daily at home increases OME resolution after 4-to-6 weeks in children with OME, compared to hand hygiene alone. Families (n = 250) perform their individually randomized program (BBC plus hand hygiene, or hand hygiene only) at home. The primary outcome is the difference in OME resolution rates between trial arms, assessed using tympanometry (type B to A or C<sub>1</sub> transition) and otoscopy. Secondary outcomes include natural OME resolution, discharges from tertiary care, family satisfaction, hearing thresholds, QoL, bacterial load in the nasopharynx and on hands, cost comparison within the RCT versus standard care, and adverse events. All outcomes are measured by blinded researchers. An intention-to-treat analysis will be performed on all randomized participants. Guided by an Aboriginal Community Advisory Group, the RCT ensures culturally appropriate research whilst addressing community priorities in managing childhood ear disease.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>If efficacious, BBC could reform OME treatment, reduce costs, and improve long-term hearing, speech, and QoL outcomes in some children. Its accessibility offers a globally scalable solution.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications\",\"volume\":\"47 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101531\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S245186542500105X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S245186542500105X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

渗出性中耳炎(OME)影响儿童的听力、语言发育和生活质量。“吹、呼吸、咳嗽”(BBC)干预措施通过擤鼻、深呼吸、咳嗽和手卫生来促进鼻腔、呼吸道和中耳的清洁。它在解决OME方面显示出希望,但缺乏随机对照试验(RCT)评估。本文提出了一项随机对照试验方案,评估BBC对2至7岁儿童OME分辨率、听力、语言和生活质量的影响。方法本平行组,1:1,结果评估盲,个体适应性随机对照试验研究了与单独洗手相比,完成BBC干预和每天两次在家洗手是否能提高OME患儿4- 6周后的OME清晰度。家庭(n = 250)在家中执行他们单独随机的计划(BBC加手卫生,或仅手卫生)。主要结果是试验组间OME分辨率的差异,使用鼓室测量法(B型到A型或C1型转换)和耳镜进行评估。次要结局包括OME自然消退、三级护理出院、家庭满意度、听力阈值、生活质量、鼻咽部和手上的细菌负荷、随机对照试验与标准治疗的成本比较以及不良事件。所有结果均由盲法研究人员测量。对所有随机受试者进行意向治疗分析。在土著社区咨询小组的指导下,随机对照试验确保进行文化上适当的研究,同时解决社区在管理儿童耳部疾病方面的优先事项。如果有效,BBC可以改革OME治疗,降低成本,改善一些儿童的长期听力、语言和生活质量。它的可访问性提供了一个全球可扩展的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the impact of the ‘Blow, Breathe, Cough’ health promotion intervention in resolving otitis media with effusion in children: An adaptive randomized-controlled trial protocol

Introduction

Otitis media with effusion (OME) affects hearing, speech development, and quality of life (QoL) in children. The ‘Blow, Breathe, Cough’ (BBC) intervention promotes nasal, respiratory, and middle ear clearance through nose blowing, deep breathing, coughing, and hand hygiene. It shows promise in resolving OME but lacks randomized-controlled trial (RCT) evaluation. This paper presents a RCT protocol evaluating BBC's effect on OME resolution, hearing, speech, and QoL in children aged two to seven years.

Methods

This parallel-group, 1:1, outcome assessor-blinded, individual adaptive RCT investigates whether completing the BBC intervention plus hand hygiene twice-daily at home increases OME resolution after 4-to-6 weeks in children with OME, compared to hand hygiene alone. Families (n = 250) perform their individually randomized program (BBC plus hand hygiene, or hand hygiene only) at home. The primary outcome is the difference in OME resolution rates between trial arms, assessed using tympanometry (type B to A or C1 transition) and otoscopy. Secondary outcomes include natural OME resolution, discharges from tertiary care, family satisfaction, hearing thresholds, QoL, bacterial load in the nasopharynx and on hands, cost comparison within the RCT versus standard care, and adverse events. All outcomes are measured by blinded researchers. An intention-to-treat analysis will be performed on all randomized participants. Guided by an Aboriginal Community Advisory Group, the RCT ensures culturally appropriate research whilst addressing community priorities in managing childhood ear disease.

Discussion

If efficacious, BBC could reform OME treatment, reduce costs, and improve long-term hearing, speech, and QoL outcomes in some children. Its accessibility offers a globally scalable solution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
146
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications is an international peer reviewed open access journal that publishes articles pertaining to all aspects of clinical trials, including, but not limited to, design, conduct, analysis, regulation and ethics. Manuscripts submitted should appeal to a readership drawn from a wide range of disciplines including medicine, life science, pharmaceutical science, biostatistics, epidemiology, computer science, management science, behavioral science, and bioethics. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications is unique in that it is outside the confines of disease specifications, and it strives to increase the transparency of medical research and reduce publication bias by publishing scientifically valid original research findings irrespective of their perceived importance, significance or impact. Both randomized and non-randomized trials are within the scope of the Journal. Some common topics include trial design rationale and methods, operational methodologies and challenges, and positive and negative trial results. In addition to original research, the Journal also welcomes other types of communications including, but are not limited to, methodology reviews, perspectives and discussions. Through timely dissemination of advances in clinical trials, the goal of Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications is to serve as a platform to enhance the communication and collaboration within the global clinical trials community that ultimately advances this field of research for the benefit of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信