对冲基金经理欺诈的新缓解剂

Majed R. Muhtaseb
{"title":"对冲基金经理欺诈的新缓解剂","authors":"Majed R. Muhtaseb","doi":"10.1016/j.jeconc.2025.100180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article aims to contribute to the limited pool of solutions designed to deter or mitigate hedge fund manager fraud and reduce the associated costs to investors and other hedge fund industry stakeholders. The methodology involves presenting three hedge fund indsutry fraud cases, focusing on their final legal outcomes and the key lessons learned. These cases illustrate how investors and industry stakeholders often suffer significant financial and reputational losses.</div><div>Drawing from these cases, the article identifies several less conventional but potentially effective mitigators of manager fraud, including: Conducting ongoing, intrusive (as opposed to standard cursory) due diligence on hedge funds; Expanding due diligence to include an examination of the hedge fund's relationships with its vendors; Collaborating with the insurance industry to develop fraud-specific hedge fund insurance policies; Investing through separate managed accounts, allowing investors direct ownership of the underlying securities; Investing in hedge funds whose vendors are large, reputable, and financially strong; and Promoting the development and application of industry-wide best practices for conducting due diligence and communication.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100775,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Criminology","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novel mitigators of hedge fund managers' fraud\",\"authors\":\"Majed R. Muhtaseb\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jeconc.2025.100180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This article aims to contribute to the limited pool of solutions designed to deter or mitigate hedge fund manager fraud and reduce the associated costs to investors and other hedge fund industry stakeholders. The methodology involves presenting three hedge fund indsutry fraud cases, focusing on their final legal outcomes and the key lessons learned. These cases illustrate how investors and industry stakeholders often suffer significant financial and reputational losses.</div><div>Drawing from these cases, the article identifies several less conventional but potentially effective mitigators of manager fraud, including: Conducting ongoing, intrusive (as opposed to standard cursory) due diligence on hedge funds; Expanding due diligence to include an examination of the hedge fund's relationships with its vendors; Collaborating with the insurance industry to develop fraud-specific hedge fund insurance policies; Investing through separate managed accounts, allowing investors direct ownership of the underlying securities; Investing in hedge funds whose vendors are large, reputable, and financially strong; and Promoting the development and application of industry-wide best practices for conducting due diligence and communication.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100775,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Economic Criminology\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100180\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Economic Criminology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949791425000569\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949791425000569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在提供有限的解决方案,以阻止或减轻对冲基金经理的欺诈行为,并降低投资者和其他对冲基金行业利益相关者的相关成本。该方法包括介绍三起对冲基金行业欺诈案件,重点介绍它们的最终法律结果和从中吸取的关键教训。这些案例表明,投资者和行业利益相关者经常遭受重大的财务和声誉损失。根据这些案例,本文确定了几种不太传统但可能有效的缓解经理欺诈的方法,包括:对对冲基金进行持续的、侵入性的(而不是标准的草率)尽职调查;扩大尽职调查,包括审查对冲基金与其供应商的关系;与保险业合作,制定针对欺诈的对冲基金保险政策;通过单独的管理账户进行投资,允许投资者直接拥有基础证券;投资那些供应商规模大、信誉好、财力雄厚的对冲基金;推动制定和应用全行业进行尽职调查和沟通的最佳做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Novel mitigators of hedge fund managers' fraud
This article aims to contribute to the limited pool of solutions designed to deter or mitigate hedge fund manager fraud and reduce the associated costs to investors and other hedge fund industry stakeholders. The methodology involves presenting three hedge fund indsutry fraud cases, focusing on their final legal outcomes and the key lessons learned. These cases illustrate how investors and industry stakeholders often suffer significant financial and reputational losses.
Drawing from these cases, the article identifies several less conventional but potentially effective mitigators of manager fraud, including: Conducting ongoing, intrusive (as opposed to standard cursory) due diligence on hedge funds; Expanding due diligence to include an examination of the hedge fund's relationships with its vendors; Collaborating with the insurance industry to develop fraud-specific hedge fund insurance policies; Investing through separate managed accounts, allowing investors direct ownership of the underlying securities; Investing in hedge funds whose vendors are large, reputable, and financially strong; and Promoting the development and application of industry-wide best practices for conducting due diligence and communication.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信