Anjan Tibrewala MD, MS , Duc Thinh Pham MD , Mo Hu MS , Lucia C. Petito PhD , Jonathan D. Rich MD , Finn Gustafsson MD, PhD , Theo M.M.H. de By MBA, PhD , Kevin Veen MD, PhD , Donald M. Lloyd-Jones MD, ScM , Sanjiv J. Shah MD
{"title":"左心室辅助装置患者等待名单死亡率的风险预测模型","authors":"Anjan Tibrewala MD, MS , Duc Thinh Pham MD , Mo Hu MS , Lucia C. Petito PhD , Jonathan D. Rich MD , Finn Gustafsson MD, PhD , Theo M.M.H. de By MBA, PhD , Kevin Veen MD, PhD , Donald M. Lloyd-Jones MD, ScM , Sanjiv J. Shah MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhlto.2025.100337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are a bridge to heart transplantation (HT). Given limited donor organs, assessment of risk of waitlist mortality is important for waitlist prioritization for HT. We sought to derive and validate a risk prediction model for waitlist mortality in LVAD patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Adult patients with a continuous-flow, centrifugal, durable LVAD listed or likely to be listed for HT in the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) were included. The outcome was time to all-cause mortality within 2 years from implant. We considered 41 candidate predictors at 3 months post-implant. Univariate Fine-Gray models and 4 logistic regression techniques (logistic, LASSO, random forest, gradient boosting) were used to select variables for a final survival model using the Fine-Gray method. The model was validated in INTERMACS and in an independent cohort (European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support [EUROMACS]). Model discrimination and calibration were evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The INTERMACS cohort included 2364 patients with 268 (11%) deaths. A risk prediction model for waitlist mortality at 2 years was derived with area-under-the-curve (AUC) of 0.72 (95% CI 0.67–0.77). The EUROMACS cohort included 577 patients with 70 (12%) deaths. The model AUC was 0.62 (95% CI 0.55–0.70). The model predicted waitlist mortality when divided into low-, medium-, or high-risk groups in the INTERMACS (p<0.001) and EUROMACS (p=0.0099) cohorts.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We derived and validated a risk prediction model for waitlist mortality in LVAD patients using 2 independent cohorts. Our risk assessment model can inform HT prioritization in LVAD patents.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100741,"journal":{"name":"JHLT Open","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100337"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk prediction model for waitlist mortality in patients with left ventricular assist devices\",\"authors\":\"Anjan Tibrewala MD, MS , Duc Thinh Pham MD , Mo Hu MS , Lucia C. Petito PhD , Jonathan D. Rich MD , Finn Gustafsson MD, PhD , Theo M.M.H. de By MBA, PhD , Kevin Veen MD, PhD , Donald M. Lloyd-Jones MD, ScM , Sanjiv J. Shah MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhlto.2025.100337\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are a bridge to heart transplantation (HT). Given limited donor organs, assessment of risk of waitlist mortality is important for waitlist prioritization for HT. We sought to derive and validate a risk prediction model for waitlist mortality in LVAD patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Adult patients with a continuous-flow, centrifugal, durable LVAD listed or likely to be listed for HT in the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) were included. The outcome was time to all-cause mortality within 2 years from implant. We considered 41 candidate predictors at 3 months post-implant. Univariate Fine-Gray models and 4 logistic regression techniques (logistic, LASSO, random forest, gradient boosting) were used to select variables for a final survival model using the Fine-Gray method. The model was validated in INTERMACS and in an independent cohort (European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support [EUROMACS]). Model discrimination and calibration were evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The INTERMACS cohort included 2364 patients with 268 (11%) deaths. A risk prediction model for waitlist mortality at 2 years was derived with area-under-the-curve (AUC) of 0.72 (95% CI 0.67–0.77). The EUROMACS cohort included 577 patients with 70 (12%) deaths. The model AUC was 0.62 (95% CI 0.55–0.70). The model predicted waitlist mortality when divided into low-, medium-, or high-risk groups in the INTERMACS (p<0.001) and EUROMACS (p=0.0099) cohorts.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We derived and validated a risk prediction model for waitlist mortality in LVAD patients using 2 independent cohorts. Our risk assessment model can inform HT prioritization in LVAD patents.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JHLT Open\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100337\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JHLT Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950133425001326\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JHLT Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950133425001326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景左心室辅助装置(LVAD)是心脏移植(HT)的桥梁。鉴于供体器官有限,评估等待名单死亡的风险对于确定等待名单的优先顺序是很重要的。我们试图推导并验证LVAD患者等待名单死亡率的风险预测模型。方法纳入在机械辅助循环支持机构间登记(INTERMACS)中列入或可能列入HT的连续流、离心式、耐用LVAD的成年患者。结果为植入后2年内的全因死亡率。我们在植入后3个月考虑了41个候选预测因子。使用单变量Fine-Gray模型和4种逻辑回归技术(logistic、LASSO、随机森林、梯度增强)为使用Fine-Gray方法的最终生存模型选择变量。该模型在INTERMACS和一个独立队列(欧洲机械循环支持患者登记处[EUROMACS])中得到验证。对模型判别和校正进行了评价。INTERMACS队列包括2364例患者,其中268例(11%)死亡。基于曲线下面积(AUC)为0.72 (95% CI 0.67-0.77),建立了等待名单2年死亡率的风险预测模型。EUROMACS队列包括577例患者,其中70例(12%)死亡。模型AUC为0.62 (95% CI 0.55 ~ 0.70)。该模型预测了INTERMACS (p= 0.001)和EUROMACS (p=0.0099)队列中低、中、高风险组的等待名单死亡率。我们通过两个独立的队列推导并验证了LVAD患者等待名单死亡率的风险预测模型。我们的风险评估模型可以为LVAD专利的HT优先级提供信息。
Risk prediction model for waitlist mortality in patients with left ventricular assist devices
Background
Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are a bridge to heart transplantation (HT). Given limited donor organs, assessment of risk of waitlist mortality is important for waitlist prioritization for HT. We sought to derive and validate a risk prediction model for waitlist mortality in LVAD patients.
Methods
Adult patients with a continuous-flow, centrifugal, durable LVAD listed or likely to be listed for HT in the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) were included. The outcome was time to all-cause mortality within 2 years from implant. We considered 41 candidate predictors at 3 months post-implant. Univariate Fine-Gray models and 4 logistic regression techniques (logistic, LASSO, random forest, gradient boosting) were used to select variables for a final survival model using the Fine-Gray method. The model was validated in INTERMACS and in an independent cohort (European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support [EUROMACS]). Model discrimination and calibration were evaluated.
Results
The INTERMACS cohort included 2364 patients with 268 (11%) deaths. A risk prediction model for waitlist mortality at 2 years was derived with area-under-the-curve (AUC) of 0.72 (95% CI 0.67–0.77). The EUROMACS cohort included 577 patients with 70 (12%) deaths. The model AUC was 0.62 (95% CI 0.55–0.70). The model predicted waitlist mortality when divided into low-, medium-, or high-risk groups in the INTERMACS (p<0.001) and EUROMACS (p=0.0099) cohorts.
Conclusions
We derived and validated a risk prediction model for waitlist mortality in LVAD patients using 2 independent cohorts. Our risk assessment model can inform HT prioritization in LVAD patents.