Hugo Trindade , Eneh Chibuzor Toivo Mark , Mona Lisa Camilleri , Eirini Tsaggari , Paddy Gilligan , Ruben Pauwels
{"title":"牙锥束计算机断层扫描诊断参考水平:现状和前进方向","authors":"Hugo Trindade , Eneh Chibuzor Toivo Mark , Mona Lisa Camilleri , Eirini Tsaggari , Paddy Gilligan , Ruben Pauwels","doi":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.105072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study provides a comprehensive overview of Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) for dental Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT), addressing the current variability and challenges associated with their implementation. Data were collected through a survey conducted among members of the Dental Imaging Special Interest Group of the European Federation of Organizations for Medical Physics, encompassing 33 countries, not limited to Europe. The focus was on official DRL documentation issued by regulatory or authorized bodies and peer-reviewed publications based on data from more than ten CBCT units.</div><div>Official DRLs were identified in Finland, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Greece, the United Kingdom, Sweden, Japan, Switzerland, and Estonia. DRLs were analyzed using two primary classification schemes: by field of view (FOV) dimensions and by clinical application or indication. The application of differing methodologies across countries was a key finding. In the clinical application-based group DRLs ranged from 200 mGy·cm<sup>2</sup> for imaging a single jaw quadrant in Sweden to 1150 mGy·cm<sup>2</sup> for paranasal sinus imaging in Finland. The United Kingdom was the only country to establish pediatric-specific DRLs. For FOV-based DRLs, values ranged from 500 mGy·cm<sup>2</sup> for FOVs ≤ 25 cm<sup>2</sup>, in Germany, to 1960 mGy·cm<sup>2</sup> for a > 100 cm<sup>2</sup> FOVs, in Japan. The variability in exposure parameters and data reporting practices complicates cross-country comparisons.</div><div>To improve radiation safety, the harmonization of DRLs is essential. Increased international collaboration, the standardization of dose metrics, and enhanced training for dental professionals are critical steps toward the implementation of evidence-based DRLs and the optimization of CBCT practices worldwide.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56092,"journal":{"name":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"137 ","pages":"Article 105072"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic reference levels for dental cone-beam computed tomography: current state and way forward\",\"authors\":\"Hugo Trindade , Eneh Chibuzor Toivo Mark , Mona Lisa Camilleri , Eirini Tsaggari , Paddy Gilligan , Ruben Pauwels\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.105072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study provides a comprehensive overview of Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) for dental Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT), addressing the current variability and challenges associated with their implementation. Data were collected through a survey conducted among members of the Dental Imaging Special Interest Group of the European Federation of Organizations for Medical Physics, encompassing 33 countries, not limited to Europe. The focus was on official DRL documentation issued by regulatory or authorized bodies and peer-reviewed publications based on data from more than ten CBCT units.</div><div>Official DRLs were identified in Finland, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Greece, the United Kingdom, Sweden, Japan, Switzerland, and Estonia. DRLs were analyzed using two primary classification schemes: by field of view (FOV) dimensions and by clinical application or indication. The application of differing methodologies across countries was a key finding. In the clinical application-based group DRLs ranged from 200 mGy·cm<sup>2</sup> for imaging a single jaw quadrant in Sweden to 1150 mGy·cm<sup>2</sup> for paranasal sinus imaging in Finland. The United Kingdom was the only country to establish pediatric-specific DRLs. For FOV-based DRLs, values ranged from 500 mGy·cm<sup>2</sup> for FOVs ≤ 25 cm<sup>2</sup>, in Germany, to 1960 mGy·cm<sup>2</sup> for a > 100 cm<sup>2</sup> FOVs, in Japan. The variability in exposure parameters and data reporting practices complicates cross-country comparisons.</div><div>To improve radiation safety, the harmonization of DRLs is essential. Increased international collaboration, the standardization of dose metrics, and enhanced training for dental professionals are critical steps toward the implementation of evidence-based DRLs and the optimization of CBCT practices worldwide.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56092,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\"137 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105072\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1120179725001826\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1120179725001826","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Diagnostic reference levels for dental cone-beam computed tomography: current state and way forward
This study provides a comprehensive overview of Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) for dental Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT), addressing the current variability and challenges associated with their implementation. Data were collected through a survey conducted among members of the Dental Imaging Special Interest Group of the European Federation of Organizations for Medical Physics, encompassing 33 countries, not limited to Europe. The focus was on official DRL documentation issued by regulatory or authorized bodies and peer-reviewed publications based on data from more than ten CBCT units.
Official DRLs were identified in Finland, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Greece, the United Kingdom, Sweden, Japan, Switzerland, and Estonia. DRLs were analyzed using two primary classification schemes: by field of view (FOV) dimensions and by clinical application or indication. The application of differing methodologies across countries was a key finding. In the clinical application-based group DRLs ranged from 200 mGy·cm2 for imaging a single jaw quadrant in Sweden to 1150 mGy·cm2 for paranasal sinus imaging in Finland. The United Kingdom was the only country to establish pediatric-specific DRLs. For FOV-based DRLs, values ranged from 500 mGy·cm2 for FOVs ≤ 25 cm2, in Germany, to 1960 mGy·cm2 for a > 100 cm2 FOVs, in Japan. The variability in exposure parameters and data reporting practices complicates cross-country comparisons.
To improve radiation safety, the harmonization of DRLs is essential. Increased international collaboration, the standardization of dose metrics, and enhanced training for dental professionals are critical steps toward the implementation of evidence-based DRLs and the optimization of CBCT practices worldwide.
期刊介绍:
Physica Medica, European Journal of Medical Physics, publishing with Elsevier from 2007, provides an international forum for research and reviews on the following main topics:
Medical Imaging
Radiation Therapy
Radiation Protection
Measuring Systems and Signal Processing
Education and training in Medical Physics
Professional issues in Medical Physics.